Literature DB >> 21239845

Investigating the temporal resolution limits of scintillation detection from pixellated elements: comparison between experiment and simulation.

V Ch Spanoudaki1, C S Levin.   

Abstract

This study investigates the physical limitations involved in the extraction of accurate timing information from pixellated scintillation detectors for positron emission tomography (PET). Accurate physical modeling of the scintillation detection process, from scintillation light generation through detection, is devised and performed for varying detector attributes, such as the crystal element length, light yield, decay time and surface treatment. The dependence of light output and time resolution on these attributes, as well as on the photon interaction depth (DoI) of the annihilation quanta within the crystal volume, is studied and compared with experimental results. A theoretical background which highlights the importance of different time blurring factors for instantaneous ('ideal') and exponential ('realistic') scintillation decay is developed and compared with simulated data. For the case of a realistic scintillator, our experimental and simulation findings suggest that dependence of detector performance on DoI is more evident for crystal elements with rough ('as cut') compared to polished surfaces (maximum observed difference of 64% (25%) and 22% (19%) in simulation (measurement) for light output and time resolution, respectively). Furthermore we observe distinct trends of the detector performance dependence on detector element length and surface treatment. For short crystals (3 × 3 × 5 mm(3)) an improvement in light output and time resolution for 'as cut' compared to polished crystals is observed (3% (7%) and 9% (9%) for simulation (measurement), respectively). The trend is reversed for longer crystals (3 × 3 × 20 mm(3)) and an improvement in light output and time uncertainty for polished compared to 'as cut' crystals is observed (36% (6%) and 40% (20%) for simulation (measurement), respectively). The results of this study are used to guide the design of PET detectors with combined time of flight (ToF) and DoI features.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21239845     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/3/013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  20 in total

Review 1.  Promising new photon detection concepts for high-resolution clinical and preclinical PET.

Authors:  Craig S Levin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Optimizing light transport in scintillation crystals for time-of-flight PET: an experimental and optical Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Emilie Roncali; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Reaching 200-ps timing resolution in a time-of-flight and depth-of-interaction positron emission tomography detector using phosphor-coated crystals and high-density silicon photomultipliers.

Authors:  Sun Il Kwon; Alessandro Ferri; Alberto Gola; Eric Berg; Claudio Piemonte; Simon R Cherry; Emilie Roncali
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-11-23

5.  Simulation of light transport in scintillators based on 3D characterization of crystal surfaces.

Authors:  Emilie Roncali; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The lower timing resolution bound for scintillators with non-negligible optical photon transport time in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Ruud Vinke; Peter D Olcott; Joshua W Cates; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A multiplexed TOF and DOI capable PET detector using a binary position sensitive network.

Authors:  M F Bieniosek; J W Cates; C S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Using convolutional neural networks to estimate time-of-flight from PET detector waveforms.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Evaluation of a clinical TOF-PET detector design that achieves ⩽100 ps coincidence time resolution.

Authors:  Joshua W Cates; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Characterization of stacked-crystal PET detector designs for measurement of both TOF and DOI.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Schmall; Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.