Literature DB >> 21235837

Triggering of the ventilator in patient-ventilator interactions.

Catherine Sh Sassoon1.   

Abstract

With current ventilator triggering design, in initiating ventilator breaths patient effort is only a small fraction of the total effort expended to overcome the inspiratory load. Similarly, advances in ventilator pressure or flow delivery and inspiratory flow termination improve patient effort or inspiratory muscle work during mechanical ventilation. Yet refinements in ventilator design do not necessarily allow optimal patient-ventilator interactions, as the clinician is key in managing patient factors and selecting appropriate ventilator factors to maintain patient-ventilator synchrony. In patient-ventilator interactions, unmatched patient flow demand by ventilator flow delivery results in flow asynchrony, whereas mismatches between mechanical inspiratory time (mechanical T(I)) and neural T(I) produce timing asynchrony. Wasted efforts are an example of timing asynchrony. In the triggering phase, trigger thresholds that are set too high or the type of triggering methods induces wasted efforts. Wasted efforts can be aggravated by respiratory muscle weakness or other conditions that reduce respiratory drive. In the post-triggering phase, ventilator factors play an important role in patient-ventilator interaction; this role includes the assistance level, set inspiratory flow rate, T(I), pressurization rate, and cycling-off threshold, and to some extent, applied PEEP. This paper proposes an algorithm that clinicians can use to adjust ventilator settings with the goal to eliminate or reduce patients' wasted efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21235837     DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Care        ISSN: 0020-1324            Impact factor:   2.258


  17 in total

1.  Patient ventilator asynchrony in critically ill adults: frequency and types.

Authors:  Karen G Mellott; Mary Jo Grap; Cindy L Munro; Curtis N Sessler; Paul A Wetzel; Jon O Nilsestuen; Jessica M Ketchum
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.210

Review 2.  Brazilian recommendations of mechanical ventilation 2013. Part I.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.624

3.  Patient-ventilator interaction in ARDS patients with extremely low compliance undergoing ECMO: a novel approach based on diaphragm electrical activity.

Authors:  Tommaso Mauri; Giacomo Bellani; Giacomo Grasselli; Andrea Confalonieri; Roberto Rona; Nicolo' Patroniti; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Noninvasive ventilation and the upper airway: should we pay more attention?

Authors:  Eline Oppersma; Jonne Doorduin; Erik H F M van der Heijden; Johannes G van der Hoeven; Leo M A Heunks
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Brazilian recommendations of mechanical ventilation 2013. Part I.

Authors:  Carmen Sílvia Valente Barbas; Alexandre Marini Isola; Augusto Manoel de Carvalho Farias; Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti; Ana Maria Casati Gama; Antonio Carlos Magalhães Duarte; Arthur Vianna; Ary Serpa Neto; Bruno de Arruda Bravim; Bruno do Valle Pinheiro; Bruno Franco Mazza; Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de Carvalho; Carlos Toufen Júnior; Cid Marcos Nascimento David; Corine Taniguchi; Débora Dutra da Silveira Mazza; Desanka Dragosavac; Diogo Oliveira Toledo; Eduardo Leite Costa; Eliana Bernardete Caser; Eliezer Silva; Fabio Ferreira Amorim; Felipe Saddy; Filomena Regina Barbosa Gomes Galas; Gisele Sampaio Silva; Gustavo Faissol Janot de Matos; João Claudio Emmerich; Jorge Luis Dos Santos Valiatti; José Mario Meira Teles; Josué Almeida Victorino; Juliana Carvalho Ferreira; Luciana Passuello do Vale Prodomo; Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar; Luiz Cláudio Martins; Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson; Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira Vargas; Marco Antonio Soares Reis; Marcelo Brito Passos Amato; Marcelo Alcântara Holanda; Marcelo Park; Marcia Jacomelli; Marcos Tavares; Marta Cristina Paulette Damasceno; Murillo Santucci César Assunção; Moyzes Pinto Coelho Duarte Damasceno; Nazah Cherif Mohamad Youssef; Paulo José Zimmermann Teixeira; Pedro Caruso; Péricles Almeida Delfino Duarte; Octavio Messeder; Raquel Caserta Eid; Ricardo Goulart Rodrigues; Rodrigo Francisco de Jesus; Ronaldo Adib Kairalla; Sandra Justino; Sérgio Nogueira Nemer; Simone Barbosa Romero; Verônica Moreira Amado
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

6.  Bench-test comparison of 26 emergency and transport ventilators.

Authors:  Erwan L'Her; Annie Roy; Nicolas Marjanovic
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  A physiology-based mathematical model for the selection of appropriate ventilator controls for lung and diaphragm protection.

Authors:  Binghao Zhang; Damian Ratano; Laurent J Brochard; Dimitrios Georgopoulos; James Duffin; Michael Long; Tom Schepens; Irene Telias; Arthur S Slutsky; Ewan C Goligher; Timothy C Y Chan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 1.977

Review 8.  Invasive mechanical ventilation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Başak Bayram; Emre Şancı
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-03-29

Review 9.  Respiratory management in the patient with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Rita Galeiras Vázquez; Pedro Rascado Sedes; Mónica Mourelo Fariña; Antonio Montoto Marqués; M Elena Ferreiro Velasco
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) during spontaneous breathing trials in critically ill patients: a crossover trial.

Authors:  Juliana C Ferreira; Fabia Diniz-Silva; Henrique T Moriya; Adriano M Alencar; Marcelo B P Amato; Carlos R R Carvalho
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.