PURPOSE:Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) usually present very low respiratory system compliance (Cst(rs)) values (i.e., severe restrictive respiratory syndrome patients). As a consequence, they are at high risk of experiencing poor patient-ventilator interaction during assisted breathing. We hypothesized that monitoring of diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi) may enhance asynchrony assessment and that neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) may reduce asynchrony, especially in more severely restricted patients. METHODS: We enrolled ten consecutive ARDS patients with very low Cst(rs) values undergoing ECMO after switching from controlled to pressure support ventilation (PSV). We randomly tested (30 min) while recording EAdi: (1) PSV30 (PSV with an expiratory trigger at 30 % of flow peak value); (2) PSV1 (PSV with expiratory trigger at 1 %); (3) NAVA. During each step, we measured the EAdi-based asynchrony index (AI(EAdi)) = flow-, pressure- and EAdi-based asynchrony events/EAdi-based respiratory rate × 100. RESULTS: AI(EAdi) was high during all ventilation modes, and the most represented asynchrony pattern was specific for this population (i.e., premature cycling). NAVA was associated with significantly decreased, although suboptimal, AI(EAdi) values in comparison to PSV30 and PSV1 (p < 0.01 for both). The PSV30-NAVA and PSV1-NAVA differences in AI(EAdi) values were inversely correlated with patients' Cst(rs) (R (2) = 0.545, p = 0.01 and R (2) = 0.425, p < 0.05; respectively). CONCLUSIONS:EAdi allows accurate analysis of asynchrony patterns and magnitude in ARDS patients with very low Cst(rs) undergoing ECMO. In these patients, NAVA is associated with reduced asynchrony.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) usually present very low respiratory system compliance (Cst(rs)) values (i.e., severe restrictive respiratory syndromepatients). As a consequence, they are at high risk of experiencing poor patient-ventilator interaction during assisted breathing. We hypothesized that monitoring of diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi) may enhance asynchrony assessment and that neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) may reduce asynchrony, especially in more severely restricted patients. METHODS: We enrolled ten consecutive ARDSpatients with very low Cst(rs) values undergoing ECMO after switching from controlled to pressure support ventilation (PSV). We randomly tested (30 min) while recording EAdi: (1) PSV30 (PSV with an expiratory trigger at 30 % of flow peak value); (2) PSV1 (PSV with expiratory trigger at 1 %); (3) NAVA. During each step, we measured the EAdi-based asynchrony index (AI(EAdi)) = flow-, pressure- and EAdi-based asynchrony events/EAdi-based respiratory rate × 100. RESULTS: AI(EAdi) was high during all ventilation modes, and the most represented asynchrony pattern was specific for this population (i.e., premature cycling). NAVA was associated with significantly decreased, although suboptimal, AI(EAdi) values in comparison to PSV30 and PSV1 (p < 0.01 for both). The PSV30-NAVA and PSV1-NAVA differences in AI(EAdi) values were inversely correlated with patients' Cst(rs) (R (2) = 0.545, p = 0.01 and R (2) = 0.425, p < 0.05; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: EAdi allows accurate analysis of asynchrony patterns and magnitude in ARDSpatients with very low Cst(rs) undergoing ECMO. In these patients, NAVA is associated with reduced asynchrony.
Authors: G R Bernard; A Artigas; K L Brigham; J Carlet; K Falke; L Hudson; M Lamy; J R Legall; A Morris; R Spragg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Alysson R Carvalho; Peter M Spieth; Andreas Güldner; Maximilano Cuevas; Nadja C Carvalho; Alessandro Beda; Stephanie Spieth; Christian Stroczynski; Bärbel Wiedemann; Thea Koch; Paolo Pelosi; Marcelo Gama de Abreu Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2011-01-26
Authors: Davide Colombo; Gianmaria Cammarota; Moreno Alemani; Luca Carenzo; Federico Lorenzo Barra; Rosanna Vaschetto; Arthur S Slutsky; Francesco Della Corte; Paolo Navalesi Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Laurence Vignaux; Frédéric Vargas; Jean Roeseler; Didier Tassaux; Arnaud W Thille; Michel P Kossowsky; Laurent Brochard; Philippe Jolliet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Andrew Davies; Daryl Jones; Michael Bailey; John Beca; Rinaldo Bellomo; Nikki Blackwell; Paul Forrest; David Gattas; Emily Granger; Robert Herkes; Andrew Jackson; Shay McGuinness; Priya Nair; Vincent Pellegrino; Ville Pettilä; Brian Plunkett; Roger Pye; Paul Torzillo; Steve Webb; Michael Wilson; Marc Ziegenfuss Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Nicolò Patroniti; Alberto Zangrillo; Federico Pappalardo; Adriano Peris; Giovanni Cianchi; Antonio Braschi; Giorgio A Iotti; Antonio Arcadipane; Giovanna Panarello; V Marco Ranieri; Pierpaolo Terragni; Massimo Antonelli; Luciano Gattinoni; Fabrizio Oleari; Antonio Pesenti Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Elie Azoulay; Giuseppe Citerio; Jan Bakker; Matteo Bassetti; Dominique Benoit; Maurizio Cecconi; J Randall Curtis; Glenn Hernandez; Margaret Herridge; Samir Jaber; Michael Joannidis; Laurent Papazian; Mark Peters; Pierre Singer; Martin Smith; Marcio Soares; Antoni Torres; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Jean-François Timsit Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jonathan D Marhong; Laveena Munshi; Michael Detsky; Teagan Telesnicki; Eddy Fan Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 17.440