Literature DB >> 21234542

The influence of graft choice on isokinetic muscle strength 4-24 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Sofia A Xergia1, Jodie A McClelland, Joanna Kvist, Haris S Vasiliadis, Anastasios D Georgoulis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Regaining adequate strength of the quadriceps and hamstrings after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is important for maximizing functional performance. However, the outcome of muscle strength after either BPTB or hamstrings autograft is unclear given the plethora of published studies that report post-operative muscle strength. The purpose of this study was to systematically compare the muscle strength of patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction using either Bone Patellar Tendon Bone (BPTB) or Hamstrings (HST) autograft.
METHODS: The databases of MEDLINE, Cinahal and EMBASE were systematically searched for articles that report muscle strength outcome following ACL reconstruction. The quality of the studies was evaluated and a meta-analysis of the muscle strength outcomes was conducted on reported data.
RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in this systematic review: eight Randomized Control Studies (RCT) and six non-Randomized Control Studies (non-RCT). A meta-analysis was performed involving eight of the included studies (4 RCTs & 3 non-RCTs). At 60°/s and 180°/s, patients with BPTB graft showed a greater deficit in extensor muscle strength and lower deficit in flexor muscle strength compared with patients with HST.
CONCLUSION: This systematic review of Level III evidence showed that isokinetic muscle strength deficits following ACL reconstruction are associated with the location of the donor site. These deficits appear to be unresolved up to 2 years after ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21234542     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1357-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  73 in total

1.  Changes in muscle torque following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between hamstrings and patella tendon graft procedures on 45 patients.

Authors:  Jayne L Anderson; Sallie E Lamb; Karen L Barker; Stephanie Davies; Christopher A Dodd; David J Beard
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-10

2.  Frequency content asymmetry of the isokinetic curve between ACL deficient and healthy knee.

Authors:  Elias Tsepis; Giannis Giakas; George Vagenas; Anastasios Georgoulis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Influence from stretch-sensitive receptors in the collateral ligaments of the knee joint on the gamma-muscle-spindle systems of flexor and extensor muscles.

Authors:  P Sojka; P Sjölander; H Johansson; M Djupsjöbacka
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.304

4.  Comparing 2-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either patella-tendon or semitendinosus-tendon autografts: a non-randomised prospective study.

Authors:  B P B Tow; P C C Chang; A K Mitra; B K Tay; M C Wong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.118

5.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study of three surgical methods.

Authors:  A F Anderson; R B Snyder; A B Lipscomb
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Secondary damage to the knee after isolated injury of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  A Finsterbush; U Frankl; Y Matan; G Mann
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Gait patterns after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are related to graft type.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Joanne E Wittwer; Jason O'Brien; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Braden C Fleming; Pekka Kannus; Michael Kaplan; John Samani; Per Renström
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  A comparison of the doubled semitendinosus/gracilis and central third of the patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  A L Otero; L Hutcheson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Preoperative quadriceps strength is a significant predictor of knee function two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  I Eitzen; I Holm; M A Risberg
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Yonatan Kaplan; Joanna Kvist; Grethe Myklebust; May Arna Risberg; Daniel Theisen; Elias Tsepis; Suzanne Werner; Barbara Wondrasch; Erik Witvrouw
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Hamstrings Neuromuscular Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  David A Sherman; Neal R Glaviano; Grant E Norte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  All-inside ACL reconstruction: How does it compare to standard ACL reconstruction techniques?

Authors:  Alexander J Connaughton; Andrew G Geeslin; Christopher W Uggen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-03-19

Review 4.  Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations.

Authors:  Christopher V Nagelli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Credibility and quality of meta-analyses addressing graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adrian Kurz; Nathan Evaniew; Marco Yeung; Kristian Samuelsson; Devin Peterson; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Lessons learned from the last 20 years of ACL-related in vivo-biomechanics research of the knee joint.

Authors:  Evangelos Pappas; Franceska Zampeli; Sofia A Xergia; Anastasios D Georgoulis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Young athletes after ACL reconstruction with quadriceps strength asymmetry at the time of return-to-sport demonstrate decreased knee function 1 year later.

Authors:  Matthew P Ithurburn; Alex R Altenburger; Staci Thomas; Timothy E Hewett; Mark V Paterno; Laura C Schmitt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Isokinetic muscle strength and knee function associated with double femoral pin fixation and fixation with interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Tiago Lazzaretti Fernandes; Thiago Rocha Protta; Felipe Fregni; Raul Bolliger Neto; André Pedrinelli; Gilberto Luis Camanho; Arnaldo José Hernandez
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Higher hamstring-to-quadriceps isokinetic strength ratio during the first post-operative months in patients with quadriceps tendon compared to hamstring tendon graft following ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Felix Fischer; Christian Fink; Elmar Herbst; Christian Hoser; Caroline Hepperger; Cornelia Blank; Peter Gföller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Current concepts for injury prevention in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Stephanie L Di Stasi; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.