| Literature DB >> 21234268 |
Chibo Liu1, Chunqin Pan, Jianmin Shen, Haibao Wang, Liang Yong.
Abstract
The aim of present study is to study the serum protein fingerprint of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and to screen protein molecules that are closely related to colorectal cancer during the onset and progression of the disease with Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Serum samples from 144 patients with CRC and 120 healthy volunteers were adopted in present study. Weak cation exchange (WCX) magnetic beads and PBSII-C protein chips reader (Ciphergen Biosystems Ins.) were used. The protein fingerprint expression of all the Serum samples and the resulted profiles between cancer and normal groups were analyzed with Biomarker Wizard system. Several proteomic peaks were detected and four potential biomarkers with different expression profiles were identified with their relative molecular weights of 2870.7 Da, 3084 Da, 9180.5 Da, and 13748.8 Da, respectively. Among the four proteins, two proteins with m/z 2870.7 and 3084 were down-regulated, and the other two with m/z 9180.5 and 13748.8 were up-regulated in serum samples from CRC patients. The present diagnostic model could distinguish CRC from healthy controls with the sensitivity of 92.85% and the specificity of 91.25%. Blind test data indicated a sensitivity of 86.95% and a specificity of 85%. The result suggested that MALDI technology could be used to screen critical proteins with differential expression in the serum of CRC patients. These differentially regulated proteins were considered as potential biomarkers for the patients with CRC in the serum and of the potential value for further investigation.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; MALDI; Protein; colorectal cancer; serum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21234268 PMCID: PMC3020391 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.8.39
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Clinical Tumor-Node-Metastasis Stages of 144 patients with CRC
| Stage | No. of patients (Training set) | No. of patients (blind set) |
|---|---|---|
| DUKES A | 18 | 10 |
| DUKES B | 44 | 22 |
| DUKES C | 15 | 8 |
| DUKES D | 21 | 6 |
| Total | 98 | 46 |
Serum samples used in training and testing sets
| Samples | Training set | blind set | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorectal cancer | 98 | 46 | 144 |
| Healthy volunteers | 80 | 40 | 120 |
| Total | 178 | 86 | 264 |
Figure 1Spectra illustrating reproducibility of 4 separate analyses from the healthy controls of blood type O. It should be noted that the results were replicable and showed same protein peaks.
Figure 2Representative protein spectrum of 2 separate analyses from CRC patient and control by MALDI-TOF MS combined with WCX magnetic beads, showing the protein m/z between 1000 and 20000. The figure showed some different peaks on the spectrum.
Figure 3Differential expression of MALDI peak m/z 2870.7, 3084, 9180.5, 13748.8 in CRC and control sera. Each peak were represented by three control and three patient samples. The arrow indicated the peak difference.
Figure 4The representative m/z peaks at 6111 and 7978 in different stage CRC patients with DUKES A and Patients with DUKES B DUKES C and DUKES D. This data suggested that in different stages of CRC patients, there could be differential regulation of biomarkers, and some of them could diminish in late stages.
The 68 discriminating m/z peaks among CRC and normal controls
| m/z | p | m/z | p | m/z | p | m/z | p | m/z | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5635.3 | 2.0×10-8 | 11513.2 | 3.2×10-6 | 4599.1 | 1.2×10-5 | 9498.9 | 6.8×10-5 | 4112.6 | 8.6×10-4 |
| 4284.5 | 4.2×10-8 | 13748.8* | 3.5×10-6 | 6837.5 | 1.5×10-5 | 23415.8 | 7.9×10-5 | 4159.9 | 8.9×10-4 |
| 2870. 7* | 4.9×10-8 | 2915.8 | 4.6×10-6 | 2949.1 | 1.9×10-5 | 2744.9 | 2.5×10-4 | 7628.5 | 9.1×10-4 |
| 4476.5 | 7.3×10-8 | 5910.8 | 5.1×10-6 | 3400.7 | 2.1×10-5 | 2800.6 | 3.6×10-4 | 6435.3 | 9.5×10-4 |
| 9180.5* | 1.5×10-7 | 5703.4 | 5.8×10-6 | 3817.5 | 2.3×10-5 | 3377.9 | 4.5×10-4 | 7564.4 | 0.001 |
| 2894.6 | 2.2×10-7 | 3320.4 | 6.3×10-6 | 5905.1 | 2.4×10-5 | 6361. 8 | 5.1×10-4 | 3692.4 | 0.001 |
| 3084* | 4.5×10-7 | 3975.31 | 6.8×10-6 | 3219.4 | 2.9×10-5 | 14784.8 | 5.5×10-4 | 7839.8 | 0.001 |
| 4452.9 | 5.8×10-7 | 4647.4 | 7.1×10-6 | 6194.6 | 3.3×10-5 | 18378.9 | 5.7×10-4 | 9342.9 | 0.002 |
| 5213 | 6.4×10-7 | 9286.1 | 7.4×10-6 | 4703.3 | 3.8×10-5 | 4387.29 | 5.8×10-4 | 24092.6 | 0.004 |
| 4945.9 | 8.8×10-7 | 2152.5 | 8.9×10-6 | 2686.1 | 4.1×10-5 | 4350.5 | 6.5×10-4 | 4299.3 | 0.004 |
| 9713.5 | 9.8×10-7 | 15114.2 | 9.2×10-6 | 5545.4 | 4.5×10-5 | 5479.3 | 6.6×10-4 | 7941 | 0.006 |
| 8564.3 | 9.9×10-7 | 2545.7 | 9.4×10-6 | 13270.1 | 4.6×10-5 | 11076.0 | 7.0×10-4 | 15309 | 0.009 |
| 5809.6 | 1.1×10-6 | 8146.1 | 9.6×10-6 | 4985.2 | 6.2×10-5 | 6883.3 | 7.5×10-4 | 2821.5 | 0.009 |
| 3089.7 | 2.0×10-7 | 2756.8 | 9.9×10-6 | 5504.8 | 6.3×10-5 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
m/z means mass-to-charge ratio. P was generated by peak comparison between CRC and normal controls. Peaks labeled by * were selected as biomarkers for CRC diagnostic model.
Figure 5The decision trees of diagnostic model for CRC. Each node was represented with different m/z value and the diagnosis result went left or right depending on the detected peaks in test sample. The sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis would significantly increase when several biomarkers were combined in use.
The prediction results of the diagnostic model for CRC
| Group | Samples | Cases | Correct-classed | Accurate % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training set | CRC | 98 | 91 | 92.85 |
| control | 80 | 73 | 91.25 | |
| Blinding set | CRC | 46 | 40 | 86.95 |
| control | 40 | 34 | 85 |