Literature DB >> 21232682

Using the mean-to-sigma ratio as a measure of the improperness of binormal ROC curves.

Stephen L Hillis1, Kevin S Berbaum.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: A basic assumption for a meaningful diagnostic decision variable is that there is a monotone relationship between the decision variable and the likelihood of disease. This relationship, however, generally does not hold for the binormal model. As a result, receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-curve estimation based on the binormal model produces improper ROC curves that are not concave over the entire domain and cross the chance line. Although in practice the "improperness" is typically not noticeable, there are situations where the improperness is evident. Presently, standard statistical software does not provide diagnostics for assessing the magnitude of the improperness.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We show how the mean-to-sigma ratio can be a useful, easy-to-understand and easy-to-use measure for assessing the magnitude of the improperness of a binormal ROC curve by showing how it is related to the chance-line crossing. We suggest an improperness criterion based on the mean-to-sigma ratio.
RESULTS: Using a real-data example, we illustrate how the mean-to-sigma ratio can be used to assess the improperness of binormal ROC curves, compare the binormal method with an alternative proper method, and describe uncertainty in a fitted ROC curve with respect to improperness.
CONCLUSIONS: By providing a quantitative and easily computable improperness measure, the mean-to-sigma ratio provides an easy way to identify improper binormal ROC curves and facilitates comparison of analysis strategies according to improperness categories in simulation and real-data studies. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21232682      PMCID: PMC3053019          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  14 in total

1.  A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part II. A formal model.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part III. Initial evaluation with detection ROC data.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part I. Some interesting examples of binormal degeneracy.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum; E A Brandser
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.223

5.  Decision processes in perception.

Authors:  J SWETS; W P TANNER; T G BIRDSALL
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.

Authors:  J A Hanley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Degeneracy and discrete receiver operating characteristic rating data.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Proper receiver operating characteristic analysis: the bigamma model.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum; C E Metz; R V Lenth; J A Hanley; H Abu Dagga
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 10.  Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implications for theory and measurement of performance.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of semiparametric receiver operating characteristic models on observer data.

Authors:  Frank W Samuelson; Xin He
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-08-28

2.  Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.

Authors:  Andriy I Bandos; Ben Guo; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Determining Roe and Metz model parameters for simulating multireader multicase confidence-of-disease rating data based on real-data or conjectured Obuchowski-Rockette parameter estimates.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis; Brian J Smith; Weijie Chen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-07-08

4.  Simulation of unequal-variance binormal multireader ROC decision data: an extension of the Roe and Metz simulation model.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Relationship between Roe and Metz simulation model for multireader diagnostic data and Obuchowski-Rockette model parameters.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Mutual Information as a Performance Measure for Binary Predictors Characterized by Both ROC Curve and PROC Curve Analysis.

Authors:  Gareth Hughes; Jennifer Kopetzky; Neil McRoberts
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.524

8.  On the Binormal Predictive Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve for the Joint Assessment of Positive and Negative Predictive Values.

Authors:  Gareth Hughes
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.524

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.