Literature DB >> 21232655

Molecular imaging in myeloma precursor disease.

Esther Mena1, Peter Choyke, Esther Tan, Ola Landgren, Karen Kurdziel.   

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is consistently preceded by its pre-malignant states, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and/or smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). By definition, precursor conditions do not exhibit end-organ disease (anemia, hypercalcemia, renal failure, skeletal lytic lesions, or a combination of these). However, new imaging methods are demonstrating that some patients in the MGUS or SMM category are exhibiting early signs of MM. Although MGUS/SMM patients are currently defined as low-risk versus high-risk based on clinical markers, we currently lack the ability to predict the individual patient's risk of progression from MGUS/SMM to MM. Given that the presence of gross lytic bone lesions is a hallmark of MM, it is reasonable to believe that less severe bone changes defined by more sensitive imaging may be predictive of MM progression. Indeed, since bone disease is such an essential aspect of MM, imaging techniques directed at the detection of early bone lesions, have the potential to become increasingly more useful in the setting of MGUS/SMM. Current guidelines for the radiological assessment of MM still recommend the traditional skeletal survey, although its limitations are well documented, especially in early phases of the disease when radiographs can significantly underestimate the extent of bone lesions and bone marrow involvement. Newer, more advanced imaging modalities, with higher sensitivities, including whole-body low-dose computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) are being employed. Also various imaging techniques have been used to provide an assessment of bone involvement and identify extra-osseous disease. This review emphasizes the current state of the art and emerging imaging methods, which may help to better define high-risk versus low-risk MGUS/SMM. Ultimately, improved imaging could allow more tailored clinical management, and, most likely play an important role in the development of future treatment strategies for high-risk precursor disease. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21232655      PMCID: PMC3023940          DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2010.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hematol        ISSN: 0037-1963            Impact factor:   3.851


  57 in total

1.  Lumbar bone marrow microcirculation measurements from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is a predictor of event-free survival in progressive multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jens Hillengass; Klaus Wasser; Stefan Delorme; Fabian Kiessling; Christian Zechmann; Axel Benner; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Anthony D Ho; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Thomas M Moehler
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Staging and therapy monitoring of multiple myeloma by 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy: a five year single center experience.

Authors:  G Villa; E Balleari; M Carletto; M Grosso; M Clavio; A Piccardo; L Rebella; L Tommasi; S Morbelli; F Peschiera; M Gobbi; R Ghio
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-09

3.  Whole-body low-dose multidetector row-CT in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma: an alternative to conventional radiography.

Authors:  Marius Horger; Claus D Claussen; Ulrike Bross-Bach; Reinhard Vonthein; Tobias Trabold; Martin Heuschmid; Christina Pfannenberg
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Early detection and accurate description of extent of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer with fluoride ion and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  H Schirrmeister; A Guhlmann; J Kotzerke; C Santjohanser; T Kühn; R Kreienberg; P Messer; K Nüssle; K Elsner; G Glatting; H Träger; B Neumaier; C Diederichs; S N Reske
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Nonmyelomatous monoclonal gammopathy: correlation of bone marrow MR images with laboratory findings and spontaneous clinical outcome.

Authors:  B C Vande Berg; L Michaux; F E Lecouvet; M Labaisse; J Malghem; J Jamart; B E Maldague; A Ferrant; J L Michaux
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ola Landgren; Robert A Kyle; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Jerry A Katzmann; Neil E Caporaso; Richard B Hayes; Angela Dispenzieri; Shaji Kumar; Raynell J Clark; Dalsu Baris; Robert Hoover; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Stage I multiple myeloma: value of MR imaging of the bone marrow in the determination of prognosis.

Authors:  B C Van de Berg; F E Lecouvet; L Michaux; M Labaisse; J Malghem; J Jamart; B E Maldague; A Ferrant; J L Michaux
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Whole-body MRI versus whole-body MDCT for staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Sonja Buhmann; Christoph Becker; Stefan Oswald Schoenberg; Nicola Lang; Reiner Bartl; Maximilian Ferdinand Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Myeloma bone disease and proteasome inhibition therapies.

Authors:  Evangelos Terpos; Orhan Sezer; Peter Croucher; Meletios-Athanassios Dimopoulos
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Correlation between the uptake of Tc-99m-sestaMIBI and prognostic factors in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  M G Alexandrakis; D S Kyriakou; F H Passam; N Malliaraki; A V Christophoridou; N Karkavitsas
Journal:  Clin Lab Haematol       Date:  2002-06
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic and prognostic utility of non-invasive imaging in diabetes management.

Authors:  Cristina Barsanti; Francesca Lenzarini; Claudia Kusmic
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-06-25

Review 2.  Whole-body MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging for the staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Julie C Dutoit; Koenraad L Verstraete
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Does my patient with a serum monoclonal spike have multiple myeloma?

Authors:  Giada Bianchi; Irene M Ghobrial
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.722

4.  Differential diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in osteolytic lesions.

Authors:  Xiaomeng Li; Ning Wu; Wenjie Zhang; Ying Liu; Yue Ming
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.072

5.  A voluminous mass as an initial clinical symptom of multiple myeloma: A case report.

Authors:  Nicola Sgherza; Angela Iacobazzi; Angelantonio Cramarossa; Giacoma DE Tullio; Attilio Guarini
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Diagnostic performance of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT compared to standard skeletal survey for detecting bone destruction in smouldering multiple myeloma: time to move forward.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hill; Esther Mena; Candis Morrison; Alexander Dew; Peter Choyke; Liza Lindenberg; Dickran Kazandjian
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 8.615

Review 7.  MRI in multiple myeloma: a pictorial review of diagnostic and post-treatment findings.

Authors:  Julie C Dutoit; Koenraad L Verstraete
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-05-10

8.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient values as prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Dan Costachescu; Ioana Ionita; Ema-Cristina Borsi; Ovidiu Potre; Cristina Potre; Dan-Bogdan Navolan; Alexandru Blidisel; Hortensia Ionita; Adelina Erimescu; Gheorghe Nicusor Pop; Daniel Claudiu Malita
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.447

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.