Literature DB >> 10561300

Early detection and accurate description of extent of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer with fluoride ion and positron emission tomography.

H Schirrmeister1, A Guhlmann, J Kotzerke, C Santjohanser, T Kühn, R Kreienberg, P Messer, K Nüssle, K Elsner, G Glatting, H Träger, B Neumaier, C Diederichs, S N Reske.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that bone metastases are revealed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or bone marrow scintigraphy several months before they are visible by conventional bone scintigraphy (BS). We present a new approach for detecting bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. We compared findings obtained with fluoride ion (F-18) and positron emission tomography (PET) with those obtained with conventional BS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four breast cancer patients were prospectively examined using F-18-PET and conventional BS. F-18-PET and BS were performed within 3 weeks of each other. Metastatic bone disease was previously known to be present in six patients and was suspected (bone pain or increasing levels of tumor markers, Ca(2+), alkaline phosphatase) in 28 patients. Both imaging modalities were compared by patient-by-patient analysis and lesion-by-lesion analysis, using a five-point scale for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. A panel of reference methods was used, including MRI (28 patients), planar x-ray (17 patients), and spiral computed tomography (four patients).
RESULTS: With F-18-PET, 64 bone metastases were detected in 17 patients. Only 29 metastases were detected in 11 patients with BS. As a result of F-18-PET imaging, clinical management was changed in four patients (11.7%). For F-18-PET, the area under the ROC curve was 0.99 on a lesion basis (for BS, it was 0.74; P <.05) and 1.00 on a patient basis (for BS, it was 0.82; P <.05).
CONCLUSION: F-18-PET demonstrates a very early bone reaction when small bone marrow metastases are present, allowing accurate detection of breast cancer bone metastases. This accurate detection has a significant effect on clinical management, compared with the effect on management brought about by detection with conventional BS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561300     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  57 in total

1.  The kinetics and reproducibility of 18F-sodium fluoride for oncology using current PET camera technology.

Authors:  Karen A Kurdziel; Joanna H Shih; Andrea B Apolo; Liza Lindenberg; Esther Mena; Yolanda Y McKinney; Stephen S Adler; Baris Turkbey; William Dahut; James L Gulley; Ravi A Madan; Ola Landgren; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Current and future use of positron emission tomography (PET) in breast cancer.

Authors:  David A Mankoff; William B Eubank
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

3.  [The Will Rogers phenomenon and its impact on imaging diagnostics].

Authors:  W A Golder
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Imaging of distant metastases of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Marcin Czarniecki; Matteo Basilio Suter; Baris Turkbey; Geert Villeirs
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Usefulness of 3'-[F-18]fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine with positron emission tomography in predicting breast cancer response to therapy.

Authors:  Betty S Pio; Cecilia K Park; Richard Pietras; Wei-Ann Hsueh; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Mark D Pegram; Johannes Czernin; Michael E Phelps; Daniel H S Silverman
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Skeletal metastases: what is the future role for nuclear medicine?

Authors:  Gary J R Cook
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Diagnosis of bone metastases: a meta-analysis comparing ¹⁸FDG PET, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Hui-Lin Yang; Tao Liu; Xi-Ming Wang; Yong Xu; Sheng-Ming Deng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Fluorinated tracers for imaging cancer with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Olivier Couturier; André Luxen; Jean-François Chatal; Jean-Philippe Vuillez; Pierre Rigo; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  (18)F and (18)FDG PET imaging of osteosarcoma to non-invasively monitor in situ changes in cellular proliferation and bone differentiation upon MYC inactivation.

Authors:  Constadina Arvanitis; Pavan K Bendapudi; Jeffrey R Tseng; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 10.  PET and PET/CT imaging of skeletal metastases.

Authors:  Gary J R Cook
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.