Literature DB >> 8816551

Stage I multiple myeloma: value of MR imaging of the bone marrow in the determination of prognosis.

B C Van de Berg1, F E Lecouvet, L Michaux, M Labaisse, J Malghem, J Jamart, B E Maldague, A Ferrant, J L Michaux.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prognostic value of bone marrow findings at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with stage I multiple myeloma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 24 patients with stage I multiple myeloma, findings from MR imaging of the vertebral, pelvic, and femoral bone marrow were analyzed and correlated to spontaneous outcome. Progressive multiple myeloma was observed in 12 patients and stable stage I multiple myeloma was observed in 12 after a follow-up period of 4-67 months (median, 27 months).
RESULTS: In 17 patients, MR imaging findings were normal, and in seven patients, bone marrow abnormalities were depicted on MR images. Of the 12 patients with progressive multiple myeloma, six had bone marrow abnormalities that were depicted at MR imaging. In the group of patients with progressive multiple myeloma, the six patients with abnormal MR imaging findings showed earlier disease progression (median, 10 months) than the six patients in whom MR imaging findings were normal (median, 32 months) (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis of clinical and MR imaging findings showed that MR imaging (P = .006) were two independent factors in the prediction of disease progression.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging of the bone marrow in patients with stage I multiple myeloma is an independent factor in the prediction of disease progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8816551     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  14 in total

1.  Whole-body turbo STIR MR imaging: controversies and avenues for development.

Authors:  Eoin Kavanagh; Clare Smith; Stephen Eustace
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in oncology, Part 2.

Authors:  Sinchun Hwang; David M Panicek
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 4.  Molecular imaging in myeloma precursor disease.

Authors:  Esther Mena; Peter Choyke; Esther Tan; Ola Landgren; Karen Kurdziel
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.851

5.  CT-guided biopsy of focal lesions in patients with multiple myeloma may reveal new and more aggressive cytogenetic abnormalities.

Authors:  R Avva; R L Vanhemert; B Barlogie; N Munshi; E J Angtuaco
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  [Radiological diagnostics of multiple myeloma].

Authors:  M D'Anastasi; S Grandl; M F Reiser; A Baur-Melnyk
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: current diagnostic criteria, new predictors of outcome, and follow-up recommendations.

Authors:  Joan Bladé; Meletios Dimopoulos; Laura Rosiñol; S Vincent Rajkumar; Robert A Kyle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 9.  Smoldering, asymptomatic stage 1, and indolent myeloma.

Authors:  P R Greipp
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2000-06

10.  [Staging of multiple myeloma with MRI: comparison to MSCT and conventional radiography].

Authors:  A Baur-Melnyk; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.