Literature DB >> 21232629

Long-term experience with coronary sinus side branch stenting to stabilize left ventricular electrode position.

László Gellér1, Szabolcs Szilágyi, Endre Zima, Levente Molnár, Gábor Széplaki, Eszter M Végh, István Osztheimer, Béla Merkely.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite technical advancements, implantation of coronary sinus (CS) leads may be challenging, and dislocation remains a relevant clinical problem.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcome of stent implantation to anchor the lead to the wall of the CS side branch.
METHODS: Stenting of a CS side branch was performed in 312 patients. The procedure was performed because of postoperative lead dislocation in 16 patients and because of an intraoperative unstable lead position or phrenic nerve stimulation in 296 cases. A bare metal coronary stent was introduced over a second guide wire in the same CS sheath. The stent was deposited 5-35 mm proximal to the most proximal electrode. Mechanical damage of the CS side branch or pericardial effusion was not observed owing to stenting.
RESULTS: During follow-up (median 28.4, interquartile range 15-37, maximum 70 months), a clinically important increase in the left ventricular pacing threshold was found in four cases and reoperation was necessary in only two patients (0.6%). Phrenic nerve stimulation was observed in 18 instances, and repositioning with an ablation catheter was performed in seven cases. Impedance measurements did not suggest lead insulation failure. Three stented leads were extracted without complication after 3-49 months owing to infection, while four leads were extracted easily during heart transplantation after 7-27 months.
CONCLUSION: Stent implantation to stabilize CS lead position seems to be an effective and safe procedure in prevention and treatment of CS lead dislocation in selected cases.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21232629     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  8 in total

1.  Against all odds: Targeted pacing site for resynchronization therapy by venoplasty and active fixation lead.

Authors:  Matteo Ziacchi; Giuseppe Boriani; Mauro Biffi
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-10-26

2.  Early coronary vein stenosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  D Aras; O Ozeke; F A Baskok; S Avci; M Cebeci; B Sensoy; K Acikgoz; S Topaloglu
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  Phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Ghassan Moubarak; Abdeslam Bouzeman; Jacky Ollitrault; Frederic Anselme; Serge Cazeau
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with implantable cardioverter defibrillator versus cardiac resynchronization therapy with pacemaker on mortality in heart failure patients: results of a high-volume, single-centre experience.

Authors:  Valentina Kutyifa; Laszlo Geller; Peter Bogyi; Endre Zima; Mehmet K Aktas; Emin Evren Ozcan; David Becker; Vivien Klaudia Nagy; Annamaria Kosztin; Szabolcs Szilagyi; Bela Merkely
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 15.534

5.  Long-term single-centre large volume experience with transseptal endocardial left ventricular lead implantation.

Authors:  László Gellér; Zoltán Salló; Levente Molnár; Tamás Tahin; Emin Evren Özcan; Valentina Kutyifa; István Osztheimer; Szabolcs Szilágyi; Nándor Szegedi; Pál Ábrahám; Astrid Apor; Klaudia Vivien Nagy; Annamária Kosztin; Dávid Becker; Szilvia Herczeg; Endre Zima; Béla Merkely
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  A case report-facing blues in cardiac amyloidosis: no more a zebra.

Authors:  Ranjit Kumar Nath; Abhinav Shrivastava
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-22

7.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison among left ventricular bipolar, quadripolar and active fixation leads.

Authors:  M Ziacchi; I Diemberger; A Corzani; C Martignani; A Mazzotti; G Massaro; C Valzania; C Rapezzi; G Boriani; M Biffi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Coronary Sinus Stenting for the Management of Left Ventricular Lead Displacement during Resynchronization Therapy: A Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Hassan Kamalzadeh; Shahrooz Yazdani; Mohammad Jalali
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2018-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.