Literature DB >> 21230072

Model for evaluating patterned charge-regulation contributions to electrostatic interactions between low-dielectric spheres.

Dawn Hollenbeck1, K Michael Martini, Andreas Langner, Anthony Harkin, David S Ross, George M Thurston.   

Abstract

We study the electrostatic contribution to the effective potential between two spherical low-dielectric particles that carry proton-titratable sites within a linearized setting. To evaluate the needed work of charging for each possible proton occupancy configuration, together with its crucial dependence on sphere separation, we numerically solve a coarse-grained linear Debye-Hückel model that incorporates nonuniform dielectric and ionic solution properties at a series of intersphere separations and for chosen titratable charge locations on each sphere. We combine the resulting work-of-charging matrix with site-specific chemical potentials of proton binding to construct the Boltzmann-weighted probabilities of each possible occupancy pattern of the titratable sites as functions of intersphere separation. With the use of these probabilities we find that a nonmonotonic average electrostatic potential can result that is repulsive at larger sphere separations but attractive at close separations. The nonmonotonic potential corresponds to particular choices of site-specific unoccupied charge values and their corresponding proton affinities, and its occurrence is dependent on pH in relation to the pKa values of the titratable groups. For the chosen titratable groups, we identify the particular change from repulsive to attractive proton occupancy patterns with decreasing intersphere separation that gives rise to the modeled nonmonotonic dependence and derive more general conditions under which such a nonmonotonic dependence can occur. Within the present model we find that stationary points of the charge-regulated average electrostatic potential, considered as a function of intersphere separation, occur when a normalized Boltzmann-averaged intersphere charge number product equals its covariance with an average free energy of charging divided by k(B)T. We derive more general conditions for the location and nature of critical points in the electrostatic intersphere potential, which are not dependent on the validity of the present linear model. Analysis of the present simple prototype model can be a helpful step toward developing a framework for predicting when (i) patterned charge-regulated occupancy patterns, (ii) orientation-dependent attractions due to relatively fixed heterogeneous charging patterns, and (iii) screened net protein charge could separately dominate the electrostatic portion of the interactions between model biological macromolecules and other nanoparticles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21230072      PMCID: PMC5830138          DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.031402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  16 in total

1.  Density fluctuations in an electrolyte from generalized Debye-Hückel theory.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Electrostatic contributions to residue-specific protonation equilibria and proton binding capacitance for a small protein.

Authors:  Stina Lindman; Sara Linse; Frans A A Mulder; Ingemar André
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Electrical double layer interactions between dissimilar oxide surfaces with charge regulation and Stern-Grahame layers.

Authors:  Derek Y C Chan; Thomas W Healy; Tharatorn Supasiti; S Usui
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 8.128

4.  Electrostatic effects in proteins: comparison of dielectric and charge models.

Authors:  E L Mehler; T Solmajer
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1991-12

5.  Langevin-Debye model for nonlinear electrostatic screening of solvated ions.

Authors:  Haipeng Gong; Karl F Freed
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  The Osmotic Pressure of Electrostatically Stabilized Colloidal Dispersions

Authors: 
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 8.128

7.  Electrostatic potential between surfaces bearing ionizable groups in ionic equilibrium with physiologic saline solution.

Authors:  B W Ninham; V A Parsegian
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Charge Regulation and Electrostatic Interactions for a Spherical Particle in a Cylindrical Pore

Authors: 
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 8.128

9.  Proton binding to proteins: pK(a) calculations with explicit and implicit solvent models.

Authors:  Thomas Simonson; Jens Carlsson; David A Case
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  SM6:  A Density Functional Theory Continuum Solvation Model for Calculating Aqueous Solvation Free Energies of Neutrals, Ions, and Solute-Water Clusters.

Authors:  Casey P Kelly; Christopher J Cramer; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  2 in total

1.  Charge-regulation phase transition on surface lattices of titratable sites adjacent to electrolyte solutions: An analog of the Ising antiferromagnet in a magnetic field.

Authors:  Joel D Shore; George M Thurston
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2015-12-14

2.  Model for screened, charge-regulated electrostatics of an eye lens protein: Bovine gammaB-crystallin.

Authors:  Christopher W Wahle; K Michael Martini; Dawn M Hollenbeck; Andreas Langner; David S Ross; John F Hamilton; George M Thurston
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.529

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.