Literature DB >> 1667878

Electrostatic effects in proteins: comparison of dielectric and charge models.

E L Mehler1, T Solmajer.   

Abstract

Two approaches for calculating electrostatic effects in proteins are compared and ana analysis is presented of the dependence of calculated properties on the model used to define the charge distribution. Changes in electrostatic free energy have been calculated using a screened Coulomb potential (SCP) with a distance-dependent effective dielectric permittivity to model bulk solvent effects and a finite difference approach to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann (FDPB) equation. The properties calculated include shifts in dissociation constants of ionizable groups, the effect of annihilating surface charges on the binding of metals, and shifts in redox potentials due to changes in the charge of ionizable groups. In the proteins considered the charged sites are separated by 3.5-12 A. It is shown that for the systems studied in this distance range the SCP yields calculated values which are at least as accurate as those obtained from solution of the FDPB equation. In addition, in the distance range 3-5 A the SCP gives substantially better results than the FDPB equation. Possible sources of this difference between the two methods are discussed. Shifts in binding constants and redox potentials were calculated with several standard charge sets, and the resulting values show a variation of 20-40% between the 'best' and 'worst' cases. From this study it is concluded that in most applications, changes in electrostatic free energies can be calculated economically and reliably using an SCP approach with a single functional form of the screening function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1667878     DOI: 10.1093/protein/4.8.903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Eng        ISSN: 0269-2139


  54 in total

1.  A self-consistent, microenvironment modulated screened coulomb potential approximation to calculate pH-dependent electrostatic effects in proteins.

Authors:  E L Mehler; F Guarnieri
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Modeling the interactions of a peptide-major histocompatibility class I ligand with its receptors. II. Cross-reaction between a monoclonal antibody and two alpha beta T cell receptors.

Authors:  D Rognan; J Engberg; A Stryhn; P S Andersen; S Buus
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Molecular dynamics of human methemoglobin: the transmission of conformational information between subunits in an alpha beta dimer.

Authors:  N Ramadas; J M Rifkind
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  In silico evaluation of TERT inhibition by anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Porika Mahendar; Kalam Sirisha; Umasankar Kulandaivelu; Prakhya Laxmi Jaya Shankar; Tippani Radhika; Abbagani Sadanandam
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  A force field with discrete displaceable waters and desolvation entropy for hydrated ligand docking.

Authors:  Stefano Forli; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  NMR-restrained docking of a peptidic inhibitor to the N-terminal domain of the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase enzyme I.

Authors:  D Rognan; S Mukhija; G Folkers; O Zerbe
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Robust scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions with quantum chemical charge models.

Authors:  Jui-Chih Wang; Jung-Hsin Lin; Chung-Ming Chen; Alex L Perryman; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Efficient docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site.

Authors:  Csaba Hetényi; David van der Spoel
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Docking and electron transfer studies between rubredoxin and rubredoxin:oxygen oxidoreductase.

Authors:  Bruno L Victor; João B Vicente; Rute Rodrigues; Solange Oliveira; Claudina Rodrigues-Pousada; Carlos Frazão; Cláudio M Gomes; Miguel Teixeira; Cláudio M Soares
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.358

10.  Docking flexible ligands in proteins with a solvent exposure- and distance-dependent dielectric function.

Authors:  Daniel P Garden; Boris S Zhorov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.