| Literature DB >> 21226940 |
Milind M Porecha1, Dipak S Parmar, Hiral R Chavda.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-term success reports by Dr. Ponseti with the Ponseti method in the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot have led to a renewed interest in this method among pediatric orthopedists. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid-term effectiveness of Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21226940 PMCID: PMC3031260 DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Functional Scoring System According to Dr. Ponseti [4]
| Category | Points |
|---|---|
| I am ... | |
| 1. very satisfied with end results | 20 |
| 2. satisfied with end results | 16 |
| 3. neither satisfied nor unsatisfied with end results | 12 |
| 4. unsatisfied with end results | 08 |
| 5. very unsatisfied with end results | 04 |
| In my daily living my club foot... | |
| 1. Does not limit my activities | 20 |
| 2. Occasionally limit my strenuous activities | 16 |
| 3. Usually limits me in strenuous activities | 12 |
| 4. Limits me occasionally in routine activities | 08 |
| 5. Limits me in walking | 04 |
| My club foot... | |
| 1. Is never painful | 30 |
| 2. Occasionally causes mild pain during strenuous activities | 24 |
| 3. Usually is painful after strenuous activities only | 18 |
| 4. Is occasionally painful during routine activities | 12 |
| 5. Is painful during walking | 06 |
| 1. Heel varus 0 degree or some heel valgus | 10 |
| 2. Heel varus 1-5 degree | 5 |
| 3. Heel varus 6-10 degree | 3 |
| 4. Heel varus >10 degree | 0 |
| 1. Dorsiflexion | 1 point per 5 degree (up to 5 points) |
| 2. Total varus-valgus motion of heel | 1 point per 10 degree (up to 3 points) |
| 3. Total inversion-eversion of foot | 1 point per 50 degree (up to 2 points |
| 1. Normal | 6 |
| 2. Can toe walk | 2 |
| 3. Can heel walk | 2 |
| 4. Limp | -2 |
| 5. No heel strike | -2 |
| 6. Abnormal toe off | -2 |
Figure 1Denis- Browne Splint for bilateral clubfoot.
Details of the Relapse Foot
| Patient's age at relapse (In months) | Bilateralism/Unilateralism at the initiation of the treatment | Side of relapsed foot | Relapse deformity | Treatment offer to correct the deformity | Result of the Treatment | Result at five year of follow up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 1. Bilateral | Left | Adductus & Varus | 4 Ponseti casts | Good | Good |
| 2. Bilateral | Left | Adductus & varus | 3 Ponseti casts | Excellent | Good | |
| 3. Unilateral | Right | Adductus | 2 Ponseti casts | Excellent | Excellent | |
| 12 | 1. Bilateral | Left | Adductus & Varus | 3 Ponseti casts | Excellent | Excellent |
| 2. Unilateral | Left | Adductus | 2 Ponseti casts | Excellent | Excellent | |
| 3. Unilateral | Right | Adductus & Varus | 3 Ponseti casts | Excellent | Good | |
| 18 | 1. Bilateral | Left | Equinus | Repeat tenotomy & 3 week cast | Excellent | Excellent |
| 2. Bilateral | Both | Adductus & Varus | 4 Ponseti casts | Excellent | Good | |
| 24 | 1. Bilateral | Both | All four deformities | 8 Ponseti casts | Poor | Poor |
| 30 | 2. Unilateral | Right | Adductus & Varus | 3 Ponseti casts | Excellent | Good |
| 3. Bilateral | Both | All four deformities | 10 Ponseti casts | Poor | Poor | |
| 36 | 1. Bilateral | Both | All four deformities | 8 Ponseti casts | Poor | Poor |
| 2. Bilateral | Both | All four deformities | 8 Ponseti casts | Poor | Poor | |
| 3. Unilateral | Left | All four deformities | 8 Ponseti casts | Poor | Poor | |
Figure 2Front look of bilateral clubfoot at 5 year follow-up.
Figure 3Back look of bilateral clubfoot at 5 year follow-up.