Literature DB >> 7593056

Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up note.

D M Cooper1, F R Dietz.   

Abstract

We evaluated forty-five patients who had seventy-one congenital clubfeet. The average age was thirty-four years (range, twenty-five to forty-two years). Twenty-nine of these patients had been evaluated and reported on in 1980. We performed pedobarographic and electrogoniometric analyses in addition to the clinical and radiographic studies performed previously. With the use of pain and functional limitation as the outcome criteria, thirty-five (78 per cent) of the forty-five patients had an excellent or good outcome compared with eighty-two (85 per cent) of ninety-seven individuals who did not have congenital deformity of the foot. The patient's occupation, passive dorsiflexion as measured with a hand-held goniometer, the antero-posterior calcaneus-fifth metatarsal angle, the total foot pressure time integral, and the number of rapid single-limb toe-ups that could be performed were the only variables that differed significantly between the feet that had an excellent or good result and those that had a poor result (p < 0.05). A comparison of the feet that had an excellent or good outcome with those that had a poor outcome with regard to body-mass index, peak pressure under the heel, and force time integral under the metatarsal heads revealed a p value that was between 0.05 and 0.08 for each variable. The technique of treatment led to good long-term results in our patients who had clubfoot. The data suggest that a sedentary occupation and avoidance of excessive weight gain may improve the over-all long-term result. Excessive weakening of the triceps surae may predispose patients to a poor result; therefore, it is prudent to avoid overlengthening of this muscle. The outcome could not be predicted from the radiographic result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7593056     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199510000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  121 in total

1.  Preliminary evaluation of implementing the Ponseti method for correction of clubfoot in Vietnam.

Authors:  Angela Margaret Evans
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 1.548

2.  Comparison of hospital costs and duration of treatment with two different clubfoot protocols.

Authors:  Laura Fernanda Alves Ferreira; Monica Paschoal Nogueira; Julio Cesar Rodrigues Pereira; Paulo Schiavom Duarte
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2011

3.  Ponseti clubfoot management: changing surgical trends in Nigeria.

Authors:  O O Adegbehingbe; L M Oginni; O J Ogundele; A L Ariyibi; P O Abiola; O D Ojo
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

4.  Does Strict Adherence to the Ponseti Method Improve Isolated Clubfoot Treatment Outcomes? A Two-institution Review.

Authors:  Nancy H Miller; Patrick M Carry; Bryan J Mark; Glenn H Engelman; Gaia Georgopoulos; Sue Graham; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The Ponseti method of treatment for clubfoot in Brazil: barriers to bracing compliance.

Authors:  Monica Paschoal Nogueira; Mark Fox; Kathleen Miller; Jose Morcuende
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

6.  Evaluation of the utility of the Ponseti method of correction of clubfoot deformity in a developing nation.

Authors:  Ankur Gupta; Saurabh Singh; Pankaj Patel; Jyotish Patel; Manish Kumar Varshney
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Clubfoot care in low-income and middle-income countries: from clinical innovation to a public health program.

Authors:  Luke Harmer; Joseph Rhatigan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Ponseti technique of correcting idiopathic clubfoot deformity.

Authors:  N C Mkandawire; E Chipofya; G Likoleche; M Phiri; L Katete
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.875

9.  Skeletal muscle contractile gene (TNNT3, MYH3, TPM2) mutations not found in vertical talus or clubfoot.

Authors:  Christina A Gurnett; Farhang Alaee; David Desruisseau; Stephanie Boehm; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Ponseti method: does age at the beginning of treatment make a difference?

Authors:  Cristina Alves; Carolina Escalda; Pedro Fernandes; Delfin Tavares; M Cassiano Neves
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.