Literature DB >> 21226465

Image charge detection mass spectrometry: pushing the envelope with sensitivity and accuracy.

John W Smith1, Elizabeth E Siegel, Joshua T Maze, Martin F Jarrold.   

Abstract

A novel image charge detection mass spectrometer (CDMS) with improved sensitivity and mass accuracy is described. The improved detector design and method of data analysis allow us to measure a reliable mass for a single macroion that is an order of magnitude smaller than previously achieved with CDMS. The apparatus employs an image charge detector array consisting of 22 detectors. The detectors are divided into two groups that can be floated at different potentials. The signals from the detector array are analyzed using a correlation approach to yield the velocities in the two groups of detectors and the charge. These quantities, together with the voltage difference between the two groups of detectors, provide a value for the mass. The mass, m/z, and charge distributions recorded for 300 kDa poly(ethylene oxide) (PEG) are presented. The mass distribution shows a peak at around 300 kDa with a width close to that expected from the polymer size distribution. In addition, there are broad peaks in the mass distribution at around 100 and 500 MDa. The 300 kDa ions have m/z ratios of ∼2 kDa/e, and the 100 and 500 MDa ions have m/z ratios of ∼40 kDa/e. The 100 and 500 MDa ions probably result from PEG aggregates that are either present in solution or the residue of large electrospray droplets.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21226465     DOI: 10.1021/ac102633p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  10 in total

1.  Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry for Single Ions with an Uncertainty in the Charge Measurement of 0.65 e.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Pierson; Nathan C Contino; David Z Keifer; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  A Miniaturized Fourier Transform Electrostatic Linear Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer: Mass Range and Resolution.

Authors:  Joshua T Johnson; Kenneth W Lee; Jay S Bhanot; Scott A McLuckey
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Effects of Individual Ion Energies on Charge Measurements in Fourier Transform Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry (FT-CDMS).

Authors:  Andrew G Elliott; Conner C Harper; Haw-Wei Lin; Evan R Williams
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Charge detection mass spectrometry with resolved charge states.

Authors:  Nathan C Contino; Elizabeth E Pierson; David Z Keifer; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Wavelet-based method for time-domain noise analysis and reduction in a frequency-scan ion trap mass spectrometer.

Authors:  Szu-Wei Chou; Guo-Rung Shiu; Huan-Cheng Chang; Wen-Ping Peng
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Single Particle Analyzer of Mass: A Charge Detection Mass Spectrometer with a Multi-Detector Electrostatic Ion Trap.

Authors:  Andrew G Elliott; Samuel I Merenbloom; Satrajit Chakrabarty; Evan R Williams
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Acquiring Structural Information on Virus Particles with Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  David Z Keifer; Tina Motwani; Carolyn M Teschke; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Dramatic Improvement in Sensitivity with Pulsed Mode Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Aaron R Todd; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Mass and Charge Measurements on Heavy Ions.

Authors:  Toshiki Sugai
Journal:  Mass Spectrom (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-12-26

10.  Detection of small bunches of ions using image charges.

Authors:  Paul Räcke; Daniel Spemann; Jürgen W Gerlach; Bernd Rauschenbach; Jan Meijer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.