Literature DB >> 21225367

Dosimetric and image quality comparison of two digital mammography units with different target/filter combinations: Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, W/Rh, W/Ag.

S Emanuelli1, E Rizzi, S Amerio, C Fasano, F Cesarani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our aim was to allocate a digital mammography unit to the screening programme on the basis of the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) radiation protection principle.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two Hologic Selenia mammography units were studied: one with a molybdenum anode and the other with a tungsten anode. After optimisation of the image production chain, we evaluated doses in a phantom under standard conditions. In this phase, we exposed a polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) phantom to the two mammography units and recorded the exposure parameters used by them. The phantom was subsequently replaced by a dedicated Radcal ionisation chamber on which preliminary dose assessments were conducted. Image quality of the two systems was compared by exposing a phantom containing geometrical inserts and setting the exposure parameters used for the dose assessments on each mammography unit. Dosimetric assessments of exposure data were recorded from the mammographic examinations of approximately 400 women (1,600 exposures). RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The unit with the tungsten anode achieved a lower patient dose. As a result, the Selenia-W device was allocated to the breast screening programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21225367     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0617-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  5 in total

1.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.

Authors:  D R Dance; C L Skinner; K C Young; J R Beckett; C J Kotre
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Computation of beam quality parameters for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, Rh/Rh, and W/Al target/filter combinations in mammography.

Authors:  Hedi Kharrati; Boubaker Zarrad
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose.

Authors:  D R Dance
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Aldo Badano; Dev Chakraborty; Ken Compton; Craig Cornelius; Kevin Corrigan; Michael J Flynn; Bradley Hemminger; Nick Hangiandreou; Jeffrey Johnson; Donna M Moxley-Stevens; William Pavlicek; Hans Roehrig; Lois Rutz; Jeffrey Shepard; Robert A Uzenoff; Jihong Wang; Charles E Willis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Risk factors for induction of breast cancer by X-rays and their implications for breast screening.

Authors:  J Law; K Faulkner; K C Young
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 3.039

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Effect of anode/filter combination on average glandular dose in mammography.

Authors:  Michał Biegała; Teresa Jakubowska; Karolina Markowska
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.