Literature DB >> 17038413

Risk factors for induction of breast cancer by X-rays and their implications for breast screening.

J Law1, K Faulkner, K C Young.   

Abstract

In order to discuss the balance of benefit and radiation risk in a breast screening programme, it is necessary to have numerical values for the probability of breast cancer induction by X-rays, stratified by age. Various sets of such values have been used hitherto, mainly in relation to breast screening in the UK, both within the NHS Screening Programme and more generally for younger age groups. Further sets have recently been reported. These different sets of values are described and discussed, together with the effects of using additive or relative risk models, and the effect of using a dose and dose rate modifying factor (DDREF). Possible new radiation risk factors for breast cancer induction by X-rays, drawn from these sets, are identified. These are used to calculate fresh values of cancer detection/induction ratios, as an index of benefit/risk, for screening age women and for younger women with and without a family history of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17038413     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/20496795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from mammography and molecular imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Michael K O'Connor; Hua Li; Deborah J Rhodes; Carrie B Hruska; Conor B Clancy; Richard J Vetter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiation risk of breast screening in England with digital mammography.

Authors:  Lucy M Warren; David R Dance; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Systematic review: surveillance for breast cancer in women treated with chest radiation for childhood, adolescent, or young adult cancer.

Authors:  Tara O Henderson; Alison Amsterdam; Smita Bhatia; Melissa M Hudson; Anna T Meadows; Joseph P Neglia; Lisa R Diller; Louis S Constine; Robert A Smith; Martin C Mahoney; Elizabeth A Morris; Leslie L Montgomery; Wendy Landier; Stephanie M Smith; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Exposure to low-dose radiation and the risk of breast cancer among women with a familial or genetic predisposition: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marijke C Jansen-van der Weide; Marcel J W Greuter; Liesbeth Jansen; Jan C Oosterwijk; Ruud M Pijnappel; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Dosimetric and image quality comparison of two digital mammography units with different target/filter combinations: Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, W/Rh, W/Ag.

Authors:  S Emanuelli; E Rizzi; S Amerio; C Fasano; F Cesarani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Using radiation risk models in cancer screening simulations: important assumptions and effects on outcome projections.

Authors:  Chung Y Kong; Janie M Lee; Pamela M McMahon; Kathryn P Lowry; Zehra B Omer; Jonathan D Eisenberg; Pari V Pandharipande; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-03-01

8.  How do I screen patients for breast cancer?

Authors:  Helen Krontiras; Rachel Bramlett; Heidi Umphrey
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2013-03

9.  Mammographic surveillance in women aged 35-39 at enhanced familial risk of breast cancer (FH02).

Authors:  D G Evans; S Thomas; J Caunt; L Roberts; A Howell; M Wilson; R Fox; D M Sibbering; S Moss; M G Wallis; D M Eccles; S Duffy
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  No strong evidence for increased risk of breast cancer 8-26 years after multiple mammograms in their 30s in females at moderate and high familial risk.

Authors:  D Gareth Evans; C John Kotre; Elaine Harkness; Mary Wilson; Anthony J Maxwell; Anthony Howell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.