Literature DB >> 21225341

Alternative management of complex renal stones.

Millie Pevzner1, Brian C Stisser, Jordan Luskin, Jeffrey C Yeamans, Marina Cheng-Lucey, John J Pahira.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The gold standard for treatment of large and complex renal stones is percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, in patients with significant comorbididties, this option may be suboptimal. We reviewed our experiences with ureterorenoscopy and Holmium laser lithotripsy (UL) for the primary management of large and complex intrarenal calculi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with large (2 cm or greater in diameter) renal or staghorn calculi were treated with primary UL. Seven patients were morbidly obese, three had solitary kidneys, two had horseshoe kidneys, three had hepatitis C virus, and three were self-pay and refused admission to the hospital. We calculated the total amount of stone burden, location and composition of calculi, number or ureterorenoscopic procedures necessary, and operative time.
RESULTS: In 42/44 renal units (95.5%), complete ureterorenoscopic fragmentation of the stone burden was accomplished. The mean number of procedures necessary to clear all stone burden was 2.07 (range 1-5). The mean stone size was 3.63 cm (range 2-9 cm). The mean operative time was 107.4 min per procedure (range 30-230 min). Two patients were treatment failures and required intervention following ureteroscopy. In both, SWL cleared the remaining stone burden. No patient required PCNL, and one patient was admitted for urosepsis.
CONCLUSION: This series demonstrates that ureterorenoscopy and Holmium laser lithotripsy is an effective and safe primary treatment modality for the treatment of large complex kidney stones. It is an attractive alternative to PCNL, particularly in those with comorbid conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21225341     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-010-9880-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  18 in total

1.  Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results.

Authors:  D M Albala; D G Assimos; R V Clayman; J D Denstedt; M Grasso; J Gutierrez-Aceves; R I Kahn; R J Leveillee; J E Lingeman; J N Macaluso; L C Munch; S Y Nakada; R C Newman; M S Pearle; G M Preminger; J Teichman; J R Woods
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Ravi Munver; Vincent G Bird; Jayant Uberoi; Ojas Shah
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; Y I Siegel; B Steele; A W Nyhuis; J R Woods
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower caliceal calculi.

Authors:  B Küpeli; H Biri; Z Sinik; K Karaca; A Tuncayengin; U Karaoğlan; I Bozkirli
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases.

Authors:  J W Segura; D E Patterson; A J LeRoy; H J Williams; D M Barrett; R C Benson; G R May; C E Bender
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Outcomes of contemporary percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  M S Pearle; S Y Nakada; J S Womack; J V Kryger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  C Renner; J Rassweiler
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.847

8.  Ureteroscopic fragmentation followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a treatment alternative for selected large or staghorn calculi.

Authors:  S P Dretler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Management of nephropleural fistula after supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Costas D Lallas; Fernando C Delvecchio; Brian R Evans; Ari D Silverstein; Glenn M Preminger; Brian K Auge
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.

Authors:  M Grasso; M Conlin; D Bagley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  7 in total

1.  A comparative study to analyze the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy combined with holmium laser lithotripsy for residual calculi after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Jiaming Wen; Zhongyi Li; Zhewei Zhang; Xiuqing Gong; Jimin Chen; Chuanjun Du
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

2.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stephan Kruck; Aristoteles G Anastasiadis; Thomas R W Herrmann; Ute Walcher; Mohamed F Abdelhafez; André P Nicklas; Lillian Hölzle; David Schilling; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Sky is no limit for ureteroscopy: extending the indications and special circumstances.

Authors:  Guido Giusti; Silvia Proietti; Roberto Peschechera; Gianluigi Taverna; Giuseppe Sortino; Luca Cindolo; Pierpaolo Graziotti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Environmental and stressful factors affecting the occurrence of kidney stones and the kidney colic.

Authors:  Rigas G Kalaitzidis; Dimitrios Damigos; Kostas C Siamopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Comparison stone-free rate and effects on quality of life of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal pelvis stone (2-4 cm): A prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Oktay Ucer; Oguzcan Erbatu; Ali Can Albaz; Gokhan Temeltas; Bilal Gumus; Talha Muezzinoglu
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  Intrarenal Surgery vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Lower Pole Stones Greater than 2 cm.

Authors:  Hakan Koyuncu; Faruk Yencilek; Mehmet Kalkan; Yavuz Bastug; Esin Yencilek; Ahmet Tunc Ozdemir
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Controversies in ureteroscopy: Wire, basket, and sheath.

Authors:  Emad R Rizkala; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.