Literature DB >> 21224763

Correlation Between Hump Dimensions and Curve Severity in Idiopathic Scoliosis Before and After Conservative Treatment.

Angelo Gabriele Aulisa1, Vincenzo Guzzanti1,2, Carlo Perisano3, Emanuele Marzetti3,4, Amerigo Menghi3, Marco Giordano1, Lorenzo Aulisa3.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study in 150 consecutive outpatients affected by adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
OBJECTIVES: The purposes were to (1) identify a correlation between hump dimensions and the severity of scoliotic curve, and (2) evaluate how the treatment influenced the main parameters of scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The existence of a relationship between clinical deformities and curve severity in AIS is still debated. Furthemore, only a few studies have investigated the effectiveness of conservative treatment for idiopathic scoliosis taking into account both clinical and radiologic factors.
METHODS: 150 consecutive outpatients (mean age 12.8 ± 1.9 years) affected by AIS were subjected to conservative brace-based treatment. 134 participants completed the treatment protocol. Two parameters were considered to evaluate the treatment progress: the hump and the Cobb angle. Measurements were determined at the beginning and the end of treatment. Statistical analyses were performed in the whole sample and after dividing the study participants into 4 subgroups: patients with lumbar (n = 66) or thoracic curves (n = 68), patients ranging in age between 6 and 13 years (n = 89) and patients ≥ 14 years of age (n = 45).
RESULTS: A positive correlation was detected between the hump dimension and curve severity at the beginning and the end of treatment, except for lumbar curves at baseline. The deformity was effectively corrected by the orthotic treatment (Cobb angle: 29.4 ± 8.5° at baseline and 19.3 ± 9.8° at the end of treatment; hump severity: 11.6 ± 5.6 mm at baseline and 6.2 ± 4.6 mm at the end). In addition, our data indicate that the hump correction is more evident than that of the curve registered in Cobb degrees.
CONCLUSION: A significant correlation exists between the hump dimension and curve severity both at the beginning and the end of treatment, except for lumbar curves at baseline. The brace treatment confirmed its effectiveness in arresting the deformity progression and inducing a remodeling both of the scoliotic curve and the hump.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 21224763     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ee77f9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Brace technology thematic series: the progressive action short brace (PASB).

Authors:  Francesco Falciglia; Marco Giordano; Emanuele Marzetti; Vincenzo Guzzanti; Angelo G Aulisa; Giuseppe Mastantuoni; Marco Laineri
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2012-02-23

Review 2.  Scoliosis and Prognosis-a systematic review regarding patient-specific and radiological predictive factors for curve progression.

Authors:  Maximilian Lenz; Stavros Oikonomidis; Arne Harland; Philipp Fürnstahl; Mazda Farshad; Jan Bredow; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Sabrina Donzelli; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Dariusz Czaprowski; Sanja Schreiber; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Helmut Diers; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Andrea Lebel; Cindy Marti; Toru Maruyama; Joe O'Brien; Nigel Price; Eric Parent; Manuel Rigo; Michele Romano; Luke Stikeleather; James Wynne; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2018-01-10

4.  2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Angelo G Aulisa; Lorenzo Aulisa; Alin B Circo; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Jacek Durmala; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Toru Maruyama; Silvia Minozzi; Joseph P O'Brien; Dimitris Papadopoulos; Manuel Rigo; Charles H Rivard; Michele Romano; James H Wynne; Monica Villagrasa; Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2012-01-20

5.  Brace treatment in juvenile idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study in accordance with the SRS criteria for bracing studies - SOSORT award 2013 winner.

Authors:  Angelo G Aulisa; Vincenzo Guzzanti; Emanuele Marzetti; Marco Giordano; Francesco Falciglia; Lorenzo Aulisa
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-04-23

6.  Correlation between compliance and brace treatment in juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: SOSORT 2014 award winner.

Authors:  Angelo G Aulisa; Marco Giordano; Francesco Falciglia; Emanuele Marzetti; Andrea Poscia; Vincenzo Guzzanti
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-06-13

7.  Torsion bottle, a very simple, reliable, and cheap tool for a basic scoliosis screening.

Authors:  Michele Romano; Matteo Mastrantonio
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2018-02-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.