Literature DB >> 29445775

Torsion bottle, a very simple, reliable, and cheap tool for a basic scoliosis screening.

Michele Romano1, Matteo Mastrantonio1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the reasons that make scoliosis a disease that scares so much the parents is its specific characteristic of being difficult to detect on its onset.The aim of this paper is to check the possible usefulness of a simple tool (the torsion bottle) that has been developed with the aim to offer an instrument for home use by parents but also for screening purposes in the low-income countries.
METHODS: Study design: retrospective analysis to evaluate intra-operator reliability of the tools and inter-operator repeatability using the torsion bottle.For the first and the second part of the study, 35 subjects were measured.The goal of the first experiment was to evaluate the reliability of the torsion bottle to identify all individuals who experienced a thoracic or lumbar prominence equal or greater than 7°.The secondary aim was to verify the reliability of blinded inter-operator assessments, performed with the torsion bottle by two physiotherapists on the same patients.
RESULTS: The reliability of the assessments of the torsion bottle has been performed with the Kappa statistic to evaluate the measurement agreement.The results have shown that the intra-operator reliability of the tool is very high between the measurements collected with the scoliometer® and those collected with the torsion bottle (kappa = 0.9278; standard error = 0.7094).The data of the second part of the study show that the inter-operator reliability is good (kappa = 0.7988; standard error 0.1368).
CONCLUSION: The collected data showed that the torsion bottle revealed itself as an efficient tool to execute a basic screening to identify the presence of a prominence in a significant group of adolescents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Measurement; Prominence; Scoliometer®

Year:  2018        PMID: 29445775      PMCID: PMC5799901          DOI: 10.1186/s13013-018-0150-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord        ISSN: 2397-1789


Background

One of the reasons that make scoliosis a disease that scares so much the parents is its specific characteristic of being difficult to detect on its onset. Too often, it is possible to recognize the appearance of the spinal curves when the disease is already severe. The reason is due to the typical, slow, and insidious debut of the symptoms. Being able to identify early the first signs of misalignment of the spine is one of the most effective treatment keys. Obviously, a frequent monitoring of the clinical signs of scoliosis is the simplest solution [1-3]. One of the most important clinical signs of this disease is the prominence [4]. The presence of the prominence is internationally recognized as an indisputable element of the pathology [5-7]. For the prominence assessment, a scoliometer® is usually used [8, 9]. The scoliometer® is a professional tool used in the medical field by physicians and physical therapists. Obviously, in a domestic field, the scoliometer® is not available. For this reason, a very simple tool called torsion bottle, cheap and easy to create, has been developed. The aim of this paper is to check the possible usefulness of this simple tool (the torsion bottle) that has been developed with the aim to offer an instrument for home use by parents but also for screening purposes in the low-income countries.

Methods

Study design: retrospective analysis to evaluate intra-operator reliability of the tool and inter-operator repeatability. The study was divided into two parts. The main aim was to compare the measurements collected with the torsion bottle and the same measurements collected with the scoliometer® (gold standard) in a population of patients accessing our clinic for the rehabilitation treatment, measured according to our standard evaluation protocol. The secondary aim was to verify the reliability of blinded inter-operator assessments, performed with the torsion bottle by two physiotherapists on the same patients. These double-blinded measurements were taken periodically for a short time interval in our clinic to verify measurement accuracy in the everyday clinical activities.

The tool

The torsion bottle is composed of a plastic water bottle of 500 ml. The perfect accuracy of the amount of water to be used is not an essential element. On the outer surface of the bottle, it will be marked with a series of four landmarks that will be essential for its use. These landmarks will be marked only after the bottle is partially emptied and carefully closed. These landmarks will be adjusted only to the particular amount of water contained in that bottle. In any case, it is recommended to fill approximately half of the bottle. The torsion bottle is used in a horizontal position as a scoliometer®. The rationale of the preparation of the torsion bottle is the variation of the position of the little quantity of water inside the bottle, when the bottle is tilted. The essential reference signs are: Landmarks 1 and 2 which should coincide with the water surface. Landmark 3 is the limit of the 7° of the bottle’s tilt, and it represents the cutoff to identify the subjects with a prominence less, equal, or greater than this value (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

The four landmarks marked on the torsion bottle

Landmark 2 is marked at a distance of 80 mm with respect to landmark 1. Landmark 3 is marked 10 mm from the landmark 2 in the orthogonal direction (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

The distances (in mm) between the landmarks

The four landmarks marked on the torsion bottle The distances (in mm) between the landmarks

How to use the torsion bottle

How to use the torsion bottle is as follows: Forward bending of the patient’s trunk to perform an Adam test [10]. The torsion bottle positioned crosswise on the patient’s back with the landmark 1 positioned over the line of bony prominences and the water surface coinciding with landmarks 1 and 2 (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Use of the torsion bottle. Positioning of the tool

Tilt the bottle until it touches the patient’s back (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Tilt of the torsion bottle toward the concavity of the curve

Rotate the bottle until the surface of the water coincides with the position of landmark 1 (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Rotation of the torsion bottle and realignment of the water surface with the landmark number 1

Observe the position of the surface of the water with respect to landmarks 3 or 4 (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6

Check of the position of the water surface respect the landmark number 3

Use of the torsion bottle. Positioning of the tool Tilt of the torsion bottle toward the concavity of the curve Rotation of the torsion bottle and realignment of the water surface with the landmark number 1 Check of the position of the water surface respect the landmark number 3

Instructions for the preparation and the use of the torsion bottle

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2u_ASmUxo0_bjBiQ0ptTUl5M3M/view?ts=57d16f0e. The water surface slope, with respect to the reference point, corresponds precisely to 7125°. The following table shows the variability linked to the potential errors in the mark of the reference points (Table 1).
Table 1

Distances between reference points and relative degrees

Dots 1-2 (cm)Dots 2-3 (cm)Degree
817,125
80,75,001
80,85,711
80,96,419
7,90,75,064
7,90,85,782
7,90,96,499
7,80,75,128
7,80,85,856
7,80,96,582
7,70,75,194
7,70,85,932
7,70,96,667
8,10,74,939
8,10,85,641
8,10,96,340
8,20,74,879
8,20,85,572
8,20,96,263
8,30,74,821
8,30,85,505
8,30,96,189
81,28,531
Distances between reference points and relative degrees For the first part of the study, 35 subjects were measured. This group included consecutive adolescents of both genders who attend a specialized clinic for the conservative treatment of scoliosis to perform their medical examinations. The goal of the experiment was to evaluate the reliability of the torsion bottle to identify all individuals who experienced a prominence equal or greater than 7°. The presence of a prominence higher than 7° is considered a clinical sign very likely linked to a scoliosis that requires a medical treatment [1]. The assessment was performed by the same evaluator. The evaluator asked the patient to bend the trunk forwards to perform an Adam test. As a first action, he performed the measurement with the torsion bottle, and in a second time, the measurement with the scoliometer® precisely performed on the same point of the trunk. For the second part of the study, the assessors measured the prominences of 35 consecutive patients who attended the same clinic for a session of conservative treatment based on Physioterapic Scoliosis Specific Exercises (PSSE). Measurements were collected blinded by two physiotherapists and processed by a third operator. The first assessor performed the first evaluation. The evaluator asked the patient to bend the trunk forwards to perform an Adam test. The assessor used the torsion bottle to measure the prominence. The evaluator made a small sign at the back where the measurement had been taken, to enable the second prominence assessment on the same spot (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7

Landmark on the prominence to made the measure on the same point

Landmark on the prominence to made the measure on the same point The subject was accompanied to another room to carry out a second evaluation performed by the second evaluator. The data collected in two different files have been handed over to a third operator who performed the comparison and the statistical tests.

Results

The following table shows the detail of the measurements taken for the first part of the study (Table 2):
Table 2

Concordance between Torsion Bottle and Scoliometer assessments

GenderTorsion Bottle AssessmentScoliometerAssessmentConcordance
FemalePositive13YES
FemalePositive8YES
FemalePositive11YES
FemalePositive7YES
FemaleNegative5YES
FemalePositive10YES
FemalePositive10YES
FemalePositive7YES
MaleNegative3YES
FemalePositive8YES
FemalePositive8YES
FemalePositive7YES
FemalePositive11YES
FemalePositive8YES
FemaleNegative3YES
FemaleNegative8NO
FemalePositive7YES
FemalePositive9YES
MalePositive12YES
MalePositive9YES
FemalePositive8YES
FemalePositive8YES
FemalePositive8YES
FemaleNegative4YES
FemalePositive7YES
FemalePositive10YES
FemaleNegative5YES
FemalePositive10YES
FemaleNegative5YES
MaleNegative6YES
FemaleNegative6YES
FemalePositive8YES
FemalePositive7YES
FemaleNegative5YES
FemalePositive11YES
Column 1: gender of the subject Column 2: the result of the measurement performed with the torsion bottle and the positive or negative hypothesis of the presence of a prominence equal to or greater than 7° Column 3: the measurement of the angle trunk rotation performed with the scoliometer® Column 4: the agreement of the measurement performed with the torsion bottle and the scoliometer® Concordance between Torsion Bottle and Scoliometer assessments Table 3 shows the details of the measurements of the second part of the study:
Table 3

Agreement between Torsion Bottle assessment performed by blinded assessors

GenderAssessor 1Assessorr 2
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemaleNegativeNegative
FemalePositivePositive
MalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
MaleNegativeNegative
MalePositivePositive
MalePositiveNegative
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemaleNegativeNegative
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
MaleNegativeNegative
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemaleNegativePositive
FemalePositivePositive
FemaleNegativeNegative
FemalePositivePositive
Column 1: gender of the subject Column 2: results of the first assessor Column 3: results of the second assessor Agreement between Torsion Bottle assessment performed by blinded assessors The reliability of the assessments of the torsion bottle has been performed with the Kappa statistic to evaluate the measurement agreement. The results have shown that the intra-operator reliability of the tool is very high between the measurements collected with the scoliometer® and those collected with the torsion bottle (kappa = 0.9278; standard error = 0.7094). The data of the second part of the study show that the inter-operator reliability is good (kappa = 0.7988; standard error 0.1368).

Discussion

The collected data showed that the torsion bottle revealed itself as an efficient tool to execute a basic screening to identify the presence of a prominence in a significant group of adolescents. The basic scoliosis screening is a very simple process but is not performed regularly because, in many countries, the health policy of this disease is based on the concept of “wait and see.” Unfortunately, this does not help in prevention but too often leads to surgical intervention, when the severity of the disease is serious. This torsion bottle has not been conceived for a professional use because the torsion bottle does not quantify the degree of the prominence, unlike the scoliometer®. It is considered more useful for a domestic use after having trained the parents. This makes it possible to achieve greater awareness and more frequent monitoring in situations of young patients at risk of evolution.

Conclusion

The torsion bottle is useful to perform a pre-investigation of the presence of a prominence, permitting a simplified assessment of its value thus directing to a specialist for a medical assessment. Another use of the torsion bottle may be provided for screening to be carried out in countries where due to the low-income problems it is difficult to find a scoliometer® or where the presence of health professionals is not so widely distributed. The water plastic bottles do not have the same shape in all countries. In some countries, it is typical to find this small bottle with a hollow in the upper part (Fig. 1). This hollow is useful because it avoids a contact with the bony prominences of the spinous processes. When such a tool is not available and it is necessary to use a bottle with a straight profile, it is important to pay attention to the spinous processes to avoid that the contact with the bottle falses the measurement.
  10 in total

1.  Italian guidelines on rehabilitation treatment of adolescents with scoliosis or other spinal deformities.

Authors:  S Negrini; L Aulisa; C Ferraro; P Fraschini; S Masiero; P Simonazzi; C Tedeschi; A Venturin
Journal:  Eura Medicophys       Date:  2005-06

2.  Hump height in idiopathic scoliosis measured using a humpmeter in growing subjects: relationship between the hump height and the Cobb angle and the effect of age on the hump height.

Authors:  Claudio Ferraro; Andrea Venturin; Marco Ferraro; Daniele Fabris Monterumici; Stefano Masiero
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.874

3.  A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's forward bend test.

Authors:  P Côté; B G Kreitz; J D Cassidy; A K Dzus; J Martel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Identifying the best surface topography parameters for detecting idiopathic scoliosis curve progression.

Authors:  E C Parent; S Damaraju; D L Hill; E Lou; D Smetaniuk
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2010

5.  Correlation Between Hump Dimensions and Curve Severity in Idiopathic Scoliosis Before and After Conservative Treatment.

Authors:  Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Vincenzo Guzzanti; Carlo Perisano; Emanuele Marzetti; Amerigo Menghi; Marco Giordano; Lorenzo Aulisa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Validity and reliability testing of the Scoliometer.

Authors:  L E Amendt; K L Ause-Ellias; J L Eybers; C T Wadsworth; D H Nielsen; S L Weinstein
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1990-02

7.  Clinical evaluation of scoliosis during growth: description and reliability.

Authors:  Fabio Zaina; Salvatore Atanasio; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2008

8.  An assessment of the reliability of the Scoliometer.

Authors:  G A Murrell; R W Coonrad; C T Moorman; R D Fitch
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Angelo G Aulisa; Lorenzo Aulisa; Alin B Circo; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Jacek Durmala; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Toru Maruyama; Silvia Minozzi; Joseph P O'Brien; Dimitris Papadopoulos; Manuel Rigo; Charles H Rivard; Michele Romano; James H Wynne; Monica Villagrasa; Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2012-01-20

10.  Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines).

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Stefano Negrini; Martha C Hawes; Manuel Rigo; Tomasz Kotwicki; Theodoros B Grivas; Toru Maruyama; Franz Landauer
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-05-08
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Validation of a Mathematical Procedure for the Cobb Angle Assessment Based on Photogrammetry.

Authors:  Isis Juliene Rodrigues Leite Navarro; Cláudia T Candotti; Tássia S Furlanetto; Vinícius H Dutra; Maiane A do Amaral; Jefferson F Loss
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2020-09-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.