STUDY DESIGN: A reliability study was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the intra- and intermeasurement errors in the measurements of functional cross-sectional area (FCSA), density, and T2 signal intensity of paraspinal muscles using computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CT scan and MRI had been used widely to measure the cross-sectional area and degeneration of the back muscles in spine and muscle research. But there is still no systemic study to analyze the reliability of these measurements. METHODS: This study measured the FCSA and fatty infiltration (density on CT scan and T2 signal intensity on MRI) of the paraspinal muscles at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 in 29 patients with chronic low back pain. Two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists and one superior spine surgeon traced the region of interest twice within 3 weeks for measurement of the intra- and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the intra-reliability ranged from fair to excellent for FCSA, and good to excellent for fatty infiltration. The ICCs of the inter-reliability ranged from fair to excellent for FCSA, and good to excellent for fatty infiltration. There were no significant differences between CT scan and MRI in reliability results, except in the relative standard error of fatty infiltration measurement. The ICCs of the FCSA measurement between CT scan and MRI ranged from poor to good. CONCLUSION: The reliabilities of the CT scan and MRI for measuring the FCSA and fatty infiltration of the atrophied lumbar paraspinal muscles were acceptable. It was reliable for using uniform one image method for a single paraspinal muscle evaluation study. And the authors preferred to advise the MRI other than CT scan for paraspinal muscles measurements of FCSA and fatty infiltration.
STUDY DESIGN: A reliability study was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the intra- and intermeasurement errors in the measurements of functional cross-sectional area (FCSA), density, and T2 signal intensity of paraspinal muscles using computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CT scan and MRI had been used widely to measure the cross-sectional area and degeneration of the back muscles in spine and muscle research. But there is still no systemic study to analyze the reliability of these measurements. METHODS: This study measured the FCSA and fatty infiltration (density on CT scan and T2 signal intensity on MRI) of the paraspinal muscles at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 in 29 patients with chronic low back pain. Two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists and one superior spine surgeon traced the region of interest twice within 3 weeks for measurement of the intra- and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the intra-reliability ranged from fair to excellent for FCSA, and good to excellent for fatty infiltration. The ICCs of the inter-reliability ranged from fair to excellent for FCSA, and good to excellent for fatty infiltration. There were no significant differences between CT scan and MRI in reliability results, except in the relative standard error of fatty infiltration measurement. The ICCs of the FCSA measurement between CT scan and MRI ranged from poor to good. CONCLUSION: The reliabilities of the CT scan and MRI for measuring the FCSA and fatty infiltration of the atrophied lumbar paraspinal muscles were acceptable. It was reliable for using uniform one image method for a single paraspinal muscle evaluation study. And the authors preferred to advise the MRI other than CT scan for paraspinal muscles measurements of FCSA and fatty infiltration.