Literature DB >> 21223311

Development and pilot testing of an Internet-based survey instrument to measure the alcohol brand preferences of U.S. youth.

Michael Siegel1, Joanna DiLoreto, Andrea Johnson, Erin K Fortunato, William DeJong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although we know a great deal about the percentage of youth who drink alcohol, we know very little about the specific brands they choose to drink. This information gap needs to be addressed if public health officials are to develop more effective interventions. Unfortunately, there are no national youth surveys that collect data on alcohol brand consumption. In this paper, we describe the development and pilot testing of what we believe to be the first comprehensive, Internet-based youth survey of brand-specific alcohol use.
METHODS: We used online advertising in 3 U.S. cities to recruit a convenience sample of 241 respondents, ages 16 to 18 years. We used Craigslist, a network of online communities that features local classified advertisements, to recruit the sample. We used SurveyGizmo, an online software program for designing Internet surveys, collecting data, and performing basic analysis, to survey these respondents about their brand-specific alcohol consumption patterns. The survey instrument assessed each respondent's 30-day drinking history, including the frequency of consumption for each alcohol brand.
RESULTS: Using Internet survey technology, we were able to collect information on 366 brands and still have respondents complete the instrument quickly and easily. The total number of brands consumed in the past 30 days ranged from 1 to 18, with a median of 4 brands. The top 5 brands consumed were beer brands, as were eleven of the top 15 brands. The remaining 4 brands in the top 15 included 3 brands of flavored alcoholic beverages and 1 brand of mixed drink. Among the top 15 alcohol brands consumed during heavy drinking episodes were 8 brands of beer, 4 brands of flavored alcoholic beverages, 2 brands of wine, and 1 brand of mixed drink.
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study helps establish the feasibility of including brand-specific questions on federal or other national youth alcohol surveys.
Copyright © 2011 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21223311     DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01394.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  14 in total

1.  The nature and extent of flavored alcoholic beverage consumption among underage youth: results of a national brand-specific survey.

Authors:  Noreen M Giga; Jane Binakonsky; Craig Ross; Michael Siegel
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.829

2.  Assessment of the average price and ethanol content of alcoholic beverages by brand--United States, 2011.

Authors:  Joanna T DiLoreto; Michael Siegel; Danielle Hinchey; Heather Valerio; Kathryn Kinzel; Stephanie Lee; Kelsey Chen; Jessica R Shoaff; Jessica Kenney; David H Jernigan; William DeJong
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Measuring youth exposure to alcohol marketing on social networking sites: challenges and prospects.

Authors:  David H Jernigan; Anne E Rushman
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.222

4.  The relationship between population-level exposure to alcohol advertising on television and brand-specific consumption among underage youth in the US.

Authors:  Craig S Ross; Emily Maple; Michael Siegel; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; Alisa A Padon; Dina L G Borzekowski; David H Jernigan
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.826

5.  The relationship between alcohol price and brand choice among underage drinkers: are the most popular alcoholic brands consumed by youth the cheapest?

Authors:  Alison B Albers; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; Michael Siegel; David H Jernigan
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.164

6.  Reward System Activation in Response to Alcohol Advertisements Predicts College Drinking.

Authors:  Andrea L Courtney; Kristina M Rapuano; James D Sargent; Todd F Heatherton; William M Kelley
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.582

7.  Differences in liquor prices between control state-operated and license-state retail outlets in the United States.

Authors:  Michael Siegel; William DeJong; Alison B Albers; Timothy S Naimi; David H Jernigan
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  State-specific liquor excise taxes and retail prices in 8 US states, 2012.

Authors:  Michael Siegel; Jody Grundman; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; Charles King; Alison B Albers; Rebecca S Williams; David H Jernigan
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.716

9.  Cued recall of alcohol advertising on television and underage drinking behavior.

Authors:  Susanne E Tanski; Auden C McClure; Zhigang Li; Kristina Jackson; Matthis Morgenstern; Zhongze Li; James D Sargent
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 16.193

10.  Brand-specific consumption of alcohol among underage youth in the United States.

Authors:  Michael Siegel; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; Erin K Fortunato; Alison B Albers; Timothy Heeren; David L Rosenbloom; Craig Ross; Joshua Ostroff; Sergei Rodkin; Charles King; Dina L G Borzekowski; Rajiv N Rimal; Alisa A Padon; Raimee H Eck; David H Jernigan
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.