Literature DB >> 21222123

Pressure at the bowel surface during topical negative pressure therapy of the open abdomen: an experimental study in a porcine model.

Thordur Bjarnason1, Agneta Montgomery, Joanna Hlebowicz, Sandra Lindstedt, Ulf Petersson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Topical negative pressure (TNP) therapy is increasingly used in open abdomen management. It is not known to what extent this pressure propagates through the dressing to the bowel surface, potentially increasing the risk of bowel fistula formation. The present study in a porcine model was designed to evaluate pressure propagation.
METHODS: A commercially available TNP therapy system (ABThera/VAC) was applied in six pigs after laparotomy. Pressure sensors were placed in predetermined positions in the dressing and in the abdominal cavity and the pressure was registered at TNP settings of -50, -75, -100, -125, and -150 mmHg. Next, after infusing 200 ml of saline into the abdomen through a catheter, the amount of fluid drained through the system during 10 min of TNP therapy was registered. Finally, pressure was measured above and below eight layers of paraffin gauzes during TNP therapy.
RESULTS: Observed pressure within the outer two foams and the foam of the visceral protective layer correlated with preset TNP. The median pressure at the bowel surface was between -2 and -10 mmHg, regardless of preset TNP. Median fluid drainage was 95% of the infused fluid at -75 mmHg and 124% at -150 mmHg. Paraffin gauzes had a limited isolating effect, reducing the pressure by 13% in median.
CONCLUSIONS: Negative pressure reaching the bowel surface during TNP therapy with the ABThera system is limited for all TNP levels. Reduced therapy pressure does not lead to reduced pressure at the bowel surface. The system drains the abdominal cavity completely of fluid. Paraffin gauzes are of limited value as a means of pressure isolation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21222123     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0937-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  26 in total

1.  Hemodynamic effects of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in cardiac surgery: assessment using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rainer Petzina; Martin Ugander; Lotta Gustafsson; Henrik Engblom; Johan Sjögren; Roland Hetzer; Richard Ingemansson; Håkan Arheden; Malin Malmsjö
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  The mechanisms of action of vacuum assisted closure: more to learn.

Authors:  Dennis P Orgill; Ernest K Manders; Bauer E Sumpio; Raphael C Lee; Christopher E Attinger; Geoffrey C Gurtner; H Paul Ehrlich
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience.

Authors:  L C Argenta; M J Morykwas
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Late fascial closure in lieu of ventral hernia: the next step in open abdomen management.

Authors:  Preston R Miller; James T Thompson; Byron J Faler; J Wayne Meredith; Michael C Chang
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2002-11

5.  Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen: planned ventral hernia rate is substantially reduced.

Authors:  Preston R Miller; J Wayne Meredith; James C Johnson; Michael C Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A ten-year review of enterocutaneous fistulas after laparotomy for trauma.

Authors:  Peter E Fischer; Timothy C Fabian; Louis J Magnotti; Thomas J Schroeppel; Tiffany K Bee; George O Maish; Stephanie A Savage; Ashley E Laing; Andrew B Barker; Martin A Croce
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-11

Review 7.  Update on open abdomen management: achievements and challenges.

Authors:  Rao R Ivatury
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Longterm impact of abdominal decompression: a prospective comparative analysis.

Authors:  Michael L Cheatham; Karen Safcsak
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  'Damage control': an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury.

Authors:  M F Rotondo; C W Schwab; M D McGonigal; G R Phillips; T M Fruchterman; D R Kauder; B A Latenser; P A Angood
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1993-09

Review 10.  Small bowel fistulas and the open abdomen.

Authors:  H P Becker; A Willms; R Schwab
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.360

View more
  8 in total

1.  Wound dehiscence: outcome comparison for sutured and mesh reconstructed patients.

Authors:  P Petersson; A Montgomery; U Petersson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Comparative study of open abdomen treatment: ABThera™ vs. abdominal dressing™.

Authors:  C Olona; A Caro; E Duque; F Moreno; J Vadillo; J C Rueda; V Vicente
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Options for closure of the infected abdomen.

Authors:  Kristin C Turza; Chris A Campbell; Laura H Rosenberger; Amani D Politano; Stephen W Davies; Lin M Riccio; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 2.150

Review 4.  Successful treatment of enteroatmospheric fistulas in combination with negative pressure wound therapy: Experience on 3 cases and literature review.

Authors:  Ulrich Wirth; Bernhard W Renz; Dorian Andrade; Tobias S Schiergens; Helmut Arbogast; Joachim Andrassy; Jens Werner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Delayed closure of open abdomen in septic patients is facilitated by combined negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial suture.

Authors:  René H Fortelny; Anna Hofmann; Simone Gruber-Blum; Alexander H Petter-Puchner; Karl S Glaser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Pressure Distribution during Negative Pressure Wound Therapy of Experimental Abdominal Compartment Syndrome in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Adrienn Csiszkó; Klaudia Balog; Zoltán Attila Godó; Gyula Juhász; Katalin Pető; Ádám Deák; Mariann Berhés; Norbert Németh; Zsolt Bodnár; Zsolt Szentkereszty
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  The Effect of Negative Pressure in the Abdominal Cavity With Suprasorb CNP on Abdominal Organs-An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Thomas Auer; Iris Wiederstein-Grasser; Siegfried Sauseng; Pavle Delcev; Karl H Preisegger
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-02-10

8.  Negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of the open abdomen and incidence of enteral fistulas: a retrospective bicentre analysis.

Authors:  Sven Richter; Stefan Dold; Johannes P Doberauer; Peter Mai; Jochen Schuld
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 2.260

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.