OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report is to evaluate and compare the long-term objective and subjective outcome after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPHR). BACKGROUND: Short-term symptomatic results of LPHR are often excellent. However, a high recurrence rate is detected at objective radiographic follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively gathered database of consecutive patients undergoing LPHR with and without reinforced crural repair at a single institution. Subjective and objective outcomes were assessed by using a structured symptoms questionnaire, Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Index, satisfaction score, and barium esophagogram. RESULTS: From September 1991 to September 2005, LPHR was performed in 85 patients (median age, 66 years) with (25 patients) and without (60 patients) reinforced crural repair. Two patients (3%) underwent laparoscopic reoperation, for severe dysphagia and for symptomatic recurrence, respectively. Subjective outcome, available for 64 patients (75%), improved significantly at median follow-up of 118 months with a postoperative median Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Index score of 116. Radiographic recurrence (median follow-up, 99 months) occurred in 23 (66%) of the 35 patients, independently of age at operation, type of paresophageal hiatal hernias, and crural reinforcement, and showed no impact on quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Although providing excellent symptomatic results, long-term objective evaluation of LPHR reveals a high recurrence rate even with reinforced cruroplasty. A tailored, lengthening gastroplasty and reinforced cruroplasty based on objective intraoperative evaluation, and not only on surgeon's personal judgment, may be the answer to recurrences.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report is to evaluate and compare the long-term objective and subjective outcome after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPHR). BACKGROUND: Short-term symptomatic results of LPHR are often excellent. However, a high recurrence rate is detected at objective radiographic follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively gathered database of consecutive patients undergoing LPHR with and without reinforced crural repair at a single institution. Subjective and objective outcomes were assessed by using a structured symptoms questionnaire, Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Index, satisfaction score, and barium esophagogram. RESULTS: From September 1991 to September 2005, LPHR was performed in 85 patients (median age, 66 years) with (25 patients) and without (60 patients) reinforced crural repair. Two patients (3%) underwent laparoscopic reoperation, for severe dysphagia and for symptomatic recurrence, respectively. Subjective outcome, available for 64 patients (75%), improved significantly at median follow-up of 118 months with a postoperative median Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Index score of 116. Radiographic recurrence (median follow-up, 99 months) occurred in 23 (66%) of the 35 patients, independently of age at operation, type of paresophageal hiatal hernias, and crural reinforcement, and showed no impact on quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Although providing excellent symptomatic results, long-term objective evaluation of LPHR reveals a high recurrence rate even with reinforced cruroplasty. A tailored, lengthening gastroplasty and reinforced cruroplasty based on objective intraoperative evaluation, and not only on surgeon's personal judgment, may be the answer to recurrences.
Authors: P A Le Page; R Furtado; M Hayward; S Law; A Tan; S J Vivian; H Van der Wall; G L Falk Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Michael Antiporda; Benjamin Veenstra; Chloe Jackson; Pujan Kandel; C Daniel Smith; Steven P Bowers Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Ralph W Aye; Alia P Qureshi; Candice L Wilshire; Alexander S Farivar; Eric Vallières; Brian E Louie Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: John R Stringham; Jennifer V Phillips; Timothy L McMurry; Drew L Lambert; David R Jones; James M Isbell; Christine L Lau; Benjamin D Kozower Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Maria S Altieri; Gabriel Pagnotti; Angelique Corthals; Kenneth Shroyer; Aurora D Pryor; Mark Talamini; Dana A Telem Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 4.584