Literature DB >> 31140000

Quantifying tension in tension-free hiatal hernia repair: a new intra-operative technique.

Lalin Navaratne1,2, Hutan Ashrafian3, Alberto Martínez-Isla4,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A similar technique to measure crural closure tension has not been described before and with this method there is now a possibility to optimise this operation with objective measures, a hundred years after it was first described. The aims of this study were to develop a reliable method for measuring the tension of crural closure during hiatal hernia repair and to describe the tension characteristics of crural closure.
METHODS: 50 patients underwent crural tension measurement. Hiatal surface area (HSA) was measured intraoperatively and a Sauter FH 50 Universal Digital Force Gauge was used to measure the tension of crural closure during cruroplasty. Outcome measures included the mean tension of the crural closure and the presence of any muscle splitting during the cruroplasty.
RESULTS: A combined total of 148 interrupted cruroplasty sutures were performed in all fifty patients. Each interrupted suture had three tension measurements recorded. The mean standard deviation amongst 148 sets of tension measurements was 0.27. Age, hiatal width and HSA were positively correlated with crural tension with r values of 0.44 (p = 0.0015), 0.81 (p < 0.0001) and 0.78 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Strength of association was low for age (r2 = 0.19) but moderate for hiatal width and HSA (r2 = 0.65 and 0.61, respectively). The presence of muscle splitting occurred at higher crural closure tension (5.3 N vs. 1.62 N, p < 0.0001). The lowest observed mean crural closure tension causing muscle splitting was 3.52 N (IQR 3.93-6.77 N).
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a technique for measuring the tension of crural closure during laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia which is reproducible, quick, of low cost and requires only minimal additional equipment. Initial findings suggest that crural closure tension up to ~ 4 N could be the permissible tension threshold for suture cruroplasty and higher tension often results in muscle splitting during cruroplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crural tension measurement; Hiatal hernia; Hiatal surface area; Mesh cruroplasty; Suture cruroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31140000     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06843-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

1.  Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Brant K Oelschlager; Carlos A Pellegrini; John G Hunter; Michael L Brunt; Nathaniel J Soper; Brett C Sheppard; Nayak L Polissar; Moni B Neradilek; Lee M Mitsumori; Charles A Rohrmann; Lee L Swanstrom
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Laparoscopic prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  M A Carlson; C G Richards; C T Frantzides
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.588

3.  A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Constantine T Frantzides; Atul K Madan; Mark A Carlson; George P Stavropoulos
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-06

4.  Paraesophageal hernia repair with biomesh does not increase postoperative dysphagia.

Authors:  Trudie A Goers; Maria A Cassera; Christy M Dunst; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with human acellular dermal matrix patch: our initial experience.

Authors:  Chad D Ringley; Victor Bochkarev; Syed I Ahmed; Michelle L Vitamvas; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Complications of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  T L Trus; T Bax; W S Richardson; G D Branum; S J Mauren; L L Swanstrom; J G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Assessment and reduction of diaphragmatic tension during hiatal hernia repair.

Authors:  Daniel Davila Bradley; Brian E Louie; Alexander S Farivar; Candice L Wilshire; Peter U Baik; Ralph W Aye
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Objective follow-up after laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia. Assessment of safety and durability.

Authors:  Giovanni Zaninotto; Giuseppe Portale; Mario Costantini; Pietro Fiamingo; Sabrina Rampado; Emanuela Guirroli; Loredana Nicoletti; Ermanno Ancona
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Suture Cruroplasty Versus Prosthetic Hiatal Herniorrhaphy for Large Hiatal Hernia: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Muhammed Ashraf Memon; Breda Memon; Rossita Mohamad Yunus; Shahjahan Khan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: tailoring the hiatal closure to the size of hiatal surface area.

Authors:  F A Granderath; U M Schweiger; R Pointner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.