Literature DB >> 21216523

SPIDER surgical system for urologic procedures with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: from initial laboratory experience to first clinical application.

Georges-Pascal Haber1, Riccardo Autorino, Humberto Laydner, Bo Yang, Michael A White, Shahab Hillyer, Fatih Altunrende, Rakesh Khanna, Gregory Spana, Isac Wahib, Khaled Fareed, Robert J Stein, Jihad H Kaouk.   

Abstract

This case study describes our initial laboratory experience using the SPIDER surgical system (TransEnterix, Morrisville, NC, USA) for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) urologic procedures and reports its first clinical application. The SPIDER system was tested in a laboratory setting and used for a clinical case of renal cyst decortication. Three tasks were performed during the dry lab session, and different urologic procedures were conducted in a porcine model. The time to complete the tasks and penalties were registered during the dry lab session. Perioperative outcomes and subjective assessment by the surgeons were registered. The surgeons had a positive experience with the SPIDER system, with a mean overall score of 3.6 (on a scale of 1-5). The surgeons were able to gain proficiency in performing tasks regardless of their level of expertise. The highest scores recorded were for ease of device insertion, instrument insertion and exchange, and triangulation. The lowest scores were for retraction. During the clinical case, the platform provided good triangulation without instrument clashing. However, retraction was challenging because of the lack of strength and precise maneuverability with the tip of the instruments fully deployed. The SPIDER system offers intuitive instrument maneuverability and restored triangulation without external instrument clashing. Further refinements are awaited to define its role in the urologic LESS armamentarium.
Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21216523     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  19 in total

Review 1.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in kidney surgery: clinical experience and future perspectives.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Stavros Kontogiannis; Iason Kyriazis; Ioannis Georgiopoulos; Abdulrahman Al-Aown; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms.

Authors:  Anthony Michael Gonzalez; Jorge Rafael Rabaza; Charan Donkor; Rey Jesús Romero; Radomir Kosanovic; Juan Carlos Verdeja
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Review and update: robotic transanal surgery (RTAS).

Authors:  Melissa G Medina; Steven S Tsoraides; Anthony M Dwyer
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-08-17

Review 4.  Evolution and simplified terminology of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), and mini-laparoscopy (ML).

Authors:  A N Georgiou; J Rassweiler; T R Herrmann; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; Eta Mu Do; P Kallidonis; A de la Teille; R van Velthoven; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  A single port laparoscopic surgery robot with high force transmission and a large workspace.

Authors:  Byungsik Cheon; Erkin Gezgin; Dae Keun Ji; Morimasa Tomikawa; Makoto Hashizume; Hong-Jin Kim; Jaesung Hong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  A state of the art review and categorization of multi-branched instruments for NOTES and SILS.

Authors:  Ewout A Arkenbout; Paul W J Henselmans; Filip Jelínek; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a novel single-incision surgical platform through a standard 15 mm trocar: initial experience and technical details.

Authors:  Ryan C Broderick; Pablo Omelanczuk; Cristina R Harnsberger; Hans F Fuchs; Martin Berducci; Jorge Nefa; Javier Nicolia; Moneer Almadani; Garth R Jacobsen; Bryan J Sandler; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Advances in laparoscopic surgery in urology.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Dogu Teber
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Review of emerging surgical robotic technology.

Authors:  Brian S Peters; Priscila R Armijo; Crystal Krause; Songita A Choudhury; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Small-incision access retroperitoneoscopic technique (SMART) pyeloplasty in adult patients: comparison of cosmetic and post-operative pain outcomes in a matched-pair analysis with standard retroperitoneoscopy: preliminary report.

Authors:  Giovannalberto Pini; Ali Serdar Goezen; Michael Schulze; Marcel Hruza; Jan Klein; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.