Richard Trafford Spence1,2, Eiman Zargaran3,4, Morad Hameed3,4, Andrew Nicol5,6, Pradeep Navsaria5,6. 1. Department of General Surgery, Codman Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. spnric004@myuct.ac.za. 2. Department of General Surgery, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. spnric004@myuct.ac.za. 3. Department of General Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada. 4. Department of General Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 5. Department of General Surgery, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. 6. Department of Trauma Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical outcomes are provider specific. This prospective audit describes the surgical activity of five general surgery residents on their trauma surgery rotation. It was hypothesized that the operating surgical trainee is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes following major trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. All patients admitted, over a 6-month period (August 2014-January 2015), following trauma requiring a major operation performed by a surgical trainee at Groote Schuur Hospital's trauma unit in South Africa were included. Multiple logistic regression models were built to compare risk-adjusted surgical outcomes between trainees. The primary outcome measure was major in-hospital complications. RESULTS: A total of 320 major operations involving 341 procedures were included. The mean age was 28.49 years (range 13-64), 97.2 % were male with a median ISS of 9 (IQR 1-41). Mechanism of injury was penetrating in 93.42 % of cases of which 51.86 % were gunshot injuries. Surgeon A consistently had the lowest risk-adjusted outcomes and was used as the reference for all outcomes in the regression models. Surgeon B, D, and E had statistically significant higher rates of major in-hospital complications than Surgeon A and C, after adjusting for multiple confounders. The final model used to calculate the risk estimates for the primary outcome had a ROC of 0.8649. CONCLUSION: Risk-adjusted surgical outcomes vary by operating surgical trainee. The analysis thereof can add value to the objective assessment of a surgical trainee.
BACKGROUND: Surgical outcomes are provider specific. This prospective audit describes the surgical activity of five general surgery residents on their trauma surgery rotation. It was hypothesized that the operating surgical trainee is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes following major trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. All patients admitted, over a 6-month period (August 2014-January 2015), following trauma requiring a major operation performed by a surgical trainee at Groote Schuur Hospital's trauma unit in South Africa were included. Multiple logistic regression models were built to compare risk-adjusted surgical outcomes between trainees. The primary outcome measure was major in-hospital complications. RESULTS: A total of 320 major operations involving 341 procedures were included. The mean age was 28.49 years (range 13-64), 97.2 % were male with a median ISS of 9 (IQR 1-41). Mechanism of injury was penetrating in 93.42 % of cases of which 51.86 % were gunshot injuries. Surgeon A consistently had the lowest risk-adjusted outcomes and was used as the reference for all outcomes in the regression models. Surgeon B, D, and E had statistically significant higher rates of major in-hospital complications than Surgeon A and C, after adjusting for multiple confounders. The final model used to calculate the risk estimates for the primary outcome had a ROC of 0.8649. CONCLUSION: Risk-adjusted surgical outcomes vary by operating surgical trainee. The analysis thereof can add value to the objective assessment of a surgical trainee.
Authors: James C Iannuzzi; Ankur Chandra; Aaron S Rickles; Neil G Kumar; Kristin N Kelly; David L Gillespie; John R T Monson; Fergal J Fleming Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Rupert M Pearse; Andrew Rhodes; Rui Moreno; Paolo Pelosi; Claudia Spies; Benoit Vallet; Philip Metnitz; Peter Bauer; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Eur J Anaesthesiol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Abraham M Tsigonis; Jeffrey Landercasper; Mohammed Al-Hamadani; Jared H Linebarger; Choua A Vang; Jeanne M Johnson; Edward Marchese; Kristen A Marcou; Jane M Hudak Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Alex B Haynes; Scott E Regenbogen; Thomas G Weiser; Stuart R Lipsitz; Gerald Dziekan; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande Journal: Surgery Date: 2011-01-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Stephen Bickler; Doruk Ozgediz; Richard Gosselin; Thomas Weiser; David Spiegel; Renee Hsia; Peter Dunbar; Kelly McQueen; Dean Jamison Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: G T O'Connor; S K Plume; E M Olmstead; J R Morton; C T Maloney; W C Nugent; F Hernandez; R Clough; B J Leavitt; L H Coffin; C A Marrin; D Wennberg; J D Birkmeyer; D C Charlesworth; D J Malenka; H B Quinton; J F Kasper Journal: JAMA Date: 1996-03-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: John G Meara; Andrew J M Leather; Lars Hagander; Blake C Alkire; Nivaldo Alonso; Emmanuel A Ameh; Stephen W Bickler; Lesong Conteh; Anna J Dare; Justine Davies; Eunice Dérivois Mérisier; Shenaaz El-Halabi; Paul E Farmer; Atul Gawande; Rowan Gillies; Sarah L M Greenberg; Caris E Grimes; Russell L Gruen; Edna Adan Ismail; Thaim Buya Kamara; Chris Lavy; Ganbold Lundeg; Nyengo C Mkandawire; Nakul P Raykar; Johanna N Riesel; Edgar Rodas; John Rose; Nobhojit Roy; Mark G Shrime; Richard Sullivan; Stéphane Verguet; David Watters; Thomas G Weiser; Iain H Wilson; Gavin Yamey; Winnie Yip Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-04-26 Impact factor: 79.321