Literature DB >> 21215317

Detection of mechanical injury of articular cartilage using contrast enhanced computed tomography.

H T Kokkonen1, J S Jurvelin, V Tiitu, J Töyräs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritic degeneration may be initiated by mechanical overloading of articular cartilage. Mechanical injury increases the permeability of tissue, thereby probably affecting the diffusion of contrast agents in articular cartilage. We investigated whether it is possible to detect acute cartilage injury by measuring contrast agent diffusion into articular cartilage using contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT).
METHODS: Osteochondral plugs (Ø=6.0 mm, n=36) were prepared from intact bovine patellae (n=9). Two of the adjacent samples were injured by impact loading, using a drop tower, while the others served as paired controls. The samples were imaged before immersion in contrast agent solution [ioxaglate (Hexabrix™) or sodium iodide (NaI)] and 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20 and 25 h after immersion using a MicroCT-instrument. Contrast agent content, diffusion coefficient and diffusion flux were determined for each sample.
RESULTS: Already after 1 h the penetration of contrast agents into cartilage was significantly (P<0.05) greater in the injured samples. The diffusion coefficient was not altered by the injury, which suggests that reaching the diffusion equilibrium takes the same time in injured and intact cartilage. However, the diffusion flux of ioxaglate through the articular surface was significantly higher in injured samples at 30-60 min after immersion.
CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, CECT could diagnose articular cartilage injuries, and determination of the diffusion flux of ioxaglate helped to detect tissue injury without waiting for the diffusion equilibrium. These results are encouraging, however, in vivo application of CECT is challenging and systematic further studies are needed to reveal its clinical potential.
Copyright © 2011 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21215317     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  23 in total

1.  Diffusion of MRI and CT contrast agents in articular cartilage under static compression.

Authors:  Yousef Shafieyan; Niloufar Khosravi; Mohammad Moeini; Thomas M Quinn
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Tantalum oxide nanoparticles for the imaging of articular cartilage using X-ray computed tomography: visualization of ex vivo/in vivo murine tibia and ex vivo human index finger cartilage.

Authors:  Jonathan D Freedman; Hrvoje Lusic; Brian D Snyder; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Topographical and depth-dependent glycosaminoglycan concentration in canine medial tibial cartilage 3 weeks after anterior cruciate ligament transection surgery-a microscopic imaging study.

Authors:  Daniel Mittelstaedt; David Kahn; Yang Xia
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

4.  Contrast enhanced CT attenuation correlates with the GAG content of bovine meniscus.

Authors:  Bejamin A Lakin; Daniel J Grasso; Rachel C Stewart; Jonathan D Freedman; Brian D Snyder; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Contrast solution properties and scan parameters influence the apparent diffusivity of computed tomography contrast agents in articular cartilage.

Authors:  Mary E Hall; Adam S Wang; Garry E Gold; Marc E Levenston
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.293

6.  An Experimental and Finite Element Protocol to Investigate the Transport of Neutral and Charged Solutes across Articular Cartilage.

Authors:  Vahid Arbabi; Behdad Pouran; Amir A Zadpoor; Harrie Weinans
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Cationic agent contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging of cartilage correlates with the compressive modulus and coefficient of friction.

Authors:  B A Lakin; D J Grasso; S S Shah; R C Stewart; P N Bansal; J D Freedman; M W Grinstaff; B D Snyder
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Adsorption and distribution of fluorescent solutes near the articular surface of mechanically injured cartilage.

Authors:  Sarah G A Decker; Mohammad Moeini; Hooi Chuan Chin; Derek H Rosenzweig; Thomas M Quinn
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Structure, composition and fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic properties of bovine knee ligaments and patellar tendon.

Authors:  Aapo Ristaniemi; Dristi Regmi; Diponkor Mondal; Jari Torniainen; Petri Tanska; Lauri Stenroth; Mikko A J Finnilä; Juha Töyräs; Rami K Korhonen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Determining collagen distribution in articular cartilage using contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  H J Nieminen; T Ylitalo; S Karhula; J-P Suuronen; S Kauppinen; R Serimaa; E Hæggström; K P H Pritzker; M Valkealahti; P Lehenkari; M Finnilä; S Saarakkala
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.