Literature DB >> 24268155

Adsorption and distribution of fluorescent solutes near the articular surface of mechanically injured cartilage.

Sarah G A Decker1, Mohammad Moeini, Hooi Chuan Chin, Derek H Rosenzweig, Thomas M Quinn.   

Abstract

The development of cartilage-specific imaging agents supports the improvement of tissue assessment by minimally invasive means. Techniques for highlighting cartilage surface damage in clinical images could provide for sensitive indications of posttraumatic injury and early stage osteoarthritis. Previous studies in our laboratory have demonstrated that fluorescent solutes interact with cartilage surfaces strongly enough to affect measurement of their partition coefficients within the tissue bulk. In this study, these findings were extended by examining solute adsorption and distribution near the articular surface of mechanically injured cartilage. Using viable cartilage explants injured by an established protocol, solute distributions near the articular surface of three commonly used fluorophores (fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC), and carboxytetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA)) were observed after absorption and subsequent desorption to assess solute-specific matrix interactions and reversibility. Both absorption and desorption processes demonstrated a trend of significantly less solute adsorption at surfaces of fissures compared to adjacent intact surfaces of damaged explants or surfaces of uninjured explants. After adsorption, normalized mean surface intensities of fissured surfaces of injured explants were 6%, 40%, and 32% for FITC, TRITC, and TAMRA, respectively, compared to uninjured surfaces. Similar values were found for sliced explants and after a desorption process. After desorption, a trend of increased solute adsorption at the site of intact damaged surfaces was noted (316% and 238% for injured and sliced explants exposed to FITC). Surface adsorption of solute was strongest for FITC and weakest for TAMRA; no solutes negatively affected cell viability. Results support the development of imaging agents that highlight distinct differences between fissured and intact cartilage surfaces.
Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24268155      PMCID: PMC3838738          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.09.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  44 in total

1.  Static compression is associated with decreased diffusivity of dextrans in cartilage explants.

Authors:  T M Quinn; P Kocian; J J Meister
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 2.  Review: tissue engineering for regeneration of articular cartilage.

Authors:  J S Temenoff; A G Mikos
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Static compression of articular cartilage can reduce solute diffusivity and partitioning: implications for the chondrocyte biological response.

Authors:  T M Quinn; V Morel; J J Meister
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) in early knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Carl Johan Tiderius; Lars E Olsson; Peter Leander; Olle Ekberg; Leif Dahlberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Distribution and diffusion of solutes in articular cartilage.

Authors:  A Maroudas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Impact of mechanical trauma on matrix and cells.

Authors:  D D D'Lima; S Hashimoto; P C Chen; C W Colwell; M K Lotz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Short-term changes in cell and matrix damage following mechanical injury of articular cartilage explants and modelling of microphysical mediators.

Authors:  V Morel; T M Quinn
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.875

8.  Cartilage injury by ramp compression near the gel diffusion rate.

Authors:  Véronique Morel; Thomas M Quinn
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Solute transport across the articular surface of injured cartilage.

Authors:  Hooi Chuan Chin; Mohammad Moeini; Thomas M Quinn
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.013

10.  A direct spectrophotometric microassay for sulfated glycosaminoglycans in cartilage cultures.

Authors:  R W Farndale; C A Sayers; A J Barrett
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.417

View more
  2 in total

1.  Contrast solution properties and scan parameters influence the apparent diffusivity of computed tomography contrast agents in articular cartilage.

Authors:  Mary E Hall; Adam S Wang; Garry E Gold; Marc E Levenston
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.293

2.  An Experimental and Finite Element Protocol to Investigate the Transport of Neutral and Charged Solutes across Articular Cartilage.

Authors:  Vahid Arbabi; Behdad Pouran; Amir A Zadpoor; Harrie Weinans
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 1.355

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.