Literature DB >> 21208944

Male fish use prior knowledge about rivals to adjust their mate choice.

David Bierbach1, Antje Girndt, Sybille Hamfler, Moritz Klein, Frauke Mücksch, Marina Penshorn, Michael Schwinn, Claudia Zimmer, Ingo Schlupp, Bruno Streit, Martin Plath.   

Abstract

Mate choice as one element of sexual selection can be sensitive to public information from neighbouring individuals. Here, we demonstrate that males of the livebearing fish Poecilia mexicana gather complex social information when given a chance to familiarize themselves with rivals prior to mate choice. Focal males ceased to show mating preferences when being observed by a rival (which prevents rivals from copying mating decisions), but this effect was only seen when focal males have perceived rivals as sexually active. In addition, focal males that were observed by a familiar, sexually active rival showed a stronger behavioural response when rivals were larger and thus, more attractive to females. Our study illustrates an unparalleled adjustment in the expression of mating preferences based on social cues, and suggests that male fish are able to remember and strategically exploit information about rivals when performing mate choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21208944      PMCID: PMC3097855          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  8 in total

1.  Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies.

Authors:  J L Kelley; J A Graves; A E Magurran
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Individual recognition, dominance hierarchies and winner and loser effects.

Authors:  Lee Alan Dugatkin; Ryan L Earley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Choosy males from the underground: male mating preferences in surface- and cave-dwelling Atlantic mollies (Poecilia mexicana).

Authors:  Martin Plath; Uta Seggel; Heike Burmeister; Katja U Heubel; Ingo Schlupp
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-02-14

4.  Fish can infer social rank by observation alone.

Authors:  Logan Grosenick; Tricia S Clement; Russell D Fernald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Male fish deceive competitors about mating preferences.

Authors:  Martin Plath; Stephanie Richter; Ralph Tiedemann; Ingo Schlupp
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Why copy others? Insights from the social learning strategies tournament.

Authors:  L Rendell; R Boyd; D Cownden; M Enquist; K Eriksson; M W Feldman; L Fogarty; S Ghirlanda; T Lillicrap; K N Laland
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Social recognition in wild fish populations.

Authors:  Ashley J W Ward; Michael M Webster; Paul J B Hart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Audience effects in the Atlantic molly (Poecilia mexicana)-prudent male mate choice in response to perceived sperm competition risk?

Authors:  Madlen Ziege; Kristin Mahlow; Carmen Hennige-Schulz; Claudia Kronmarck; Ralph Tiedemann; Bruno Streit; Martin Plath
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.172

  8 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  It's all in your head: the role of quantity estimation in sperm competition.

Authors:  Eran M Shifferman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sex and the public: Social eavesdropping, sperm competition risk and male mate choice.

Authors:  Martin Plath; David Bierbach
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-05

3.  The role of familiarity in signaller-receiver interactions.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; James P Higham
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Predator-induced changes of female mating preferences: innate and experiential effects.

Authors:  David Bierbach; Matthias Schulte; Nina Herrmann; Michael Tobler; Stefan Stadler; Christian T Jung; Benjamin Kunkel; Rüdiger Riesch; Sebastian Klaus; Madlen Ziege; Jeane Rimber Indy; Lenin Arias-Rodriguez; Martin Plath
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  The effect of observers on behavior and the brain during aggressive encounters.

Authors:  Julie K Desjardins; Lisa Becker; Russell D Fernald
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Do male meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) always prefer and signal to 'popular' females? The role of social information context.

Authors:  Ryan C Scauzillo; Michael H Ferkin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Social recognition is context dependent in single male prairie voles.

Authors:  Da-Jiang Zheng; Lauren Foley; Asad Rehman; Alexander G Ophir
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Divergent evolution of male aggressive behaviour: another reproductive isolation barrier in extremophile poeciliid fishes?

Authors:  David Bierbach; Moritz Klein; Vanessa Saßmannshausen; Ingo Schlupp; Rüdiger Riesch; Jakob Parzefall; Martin Plath
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-10-23

9.  Casanovas are liars: behavioral syndromes, sperm competition risk, and the evolution of deceptive male mating behavior in live-bearing fishes.

Authors:  David Bierbach; Amber M Makowicz; Ingo Schlupp; Holger Geupel; Bruno Streit; Martin Plath
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-03-05

Review 10.  A conceptual review of mate choice: stochastic demography, within-sex phenotypic plasticity, and individual flexibility.

Authors:  Malin Ah-King; Patricia Adair Gowaty
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.