Literature DB >> 18674912

Male fish deceive competitors about mating preferences.

Martin Plath1, Stephanie Richter, Ralph Tiedemann, Ingo Schlupp.   

Abstract

A fundamental question in animal communication is whether the information provided is honest or deceptive [1, 2]. This problem has received much attention, both in theoretical [1, 3] and experimental [4] work. Here we show that male Atlantic mollies (Poecilia mexicana), when observed during mate choice by another male, reduce their mating activity and no longer prefer mating with one of two females presented, which can be interpreted as an attempt to avoid unintended interception of information by the rival male. Most importantly, focal males directed their first sexual interaction (after they were presented with the rival male) toward the initially nonpreferred female, suggesting that males deceive other males about their mating preferences. Deception by the choosing male may be an adaptation to avoid sperm competition, because surrounding males may use public information and copy the focal male's mate choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18674912     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  14 in total

1.  Sex and the public: Social eavesdropping, sperm competition risk and male mate choice.

Authors:  Martin Plath; David Bierbach
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-05

Review 2.  Social eavesdropping and the evolution of conditional cooperation and cheating strategies.

Authors:  Ryan L Earley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Male fish use prior knowledge about rivals to adjust their mate choice.

Authors:  David Bierbach; Antje Girndt; Sybille Hamfler; Moritz Klein; Frauke Mücksch; Marina Penshorn; Michael Schwinn; Claudia Zimmer; Ingo Schlupp; Bruno Streit; Martin Plath
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Misleading mollies: The effect of an audience on the expression of mating preferences.

Authors:  Martin Plath; Ingo Schlupp
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2008

5.  Predator-induced changes of female mating preferences: innate and experiential effects.

Authors:  David Bierbach; Matthias Schulte; Nina Herrmann; Michael Tobler; Stefan Stadler; Christian T Jung; Benjamin Kunkel; Rüdiger Riesch; Sebastian Klaus; Madlen Ziege; Jeane Rimber Indy; Lenin Arias-Rodriguez; Martin Plath
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Studying audience effects in animals: what we can learn from human language research.

Authors:  Brittany Coppinger; Ryan A Cannistraci; Ferhat Karaman; Steven C Kyle; Elizabeth A Hobson; Todd M Freeberg; Jessica F Hay
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Social behaviour: can it change the brain?

Authors:  Russell D Fernald
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Social context influences aggressive and courtship behavior in a cichlid fish.

Authors:  Julie K Desjardins; Hans A Hofmann; Russell D Fernald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Audience effects in the Atlantic molly (Poecilia mexicana)-prudent male mate choice in response to perceived sperm competition risk?

Authors:  Madlen Ziege; Kristin Mahlow; Carmen Hennige-Schulz; Claudia Kronmarck; Ralph Tiedemann; Bruno Streit; Martin Plath
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Public information influences sperm transfer to females in sailfin molly males.

Authors:  Sabine Nöbel; Klaudia Witte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.