Literature DB >> 21207166

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a review of 285 published cases.

Andrew A Gumbs1, Angel M Rodriguez Rivera, Luca Milone, John P Hoffman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the difficulty level of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD), limited data exist for a comparison to open pancreatoduodenectomies. As the technique becomes more diffuse, issues regarding the adequacy of oncologic margins and lymph node retrieval need to be addressed.
METHODS: All published cases of MIPD were examined. Variables analyzed included conversion rates, operating room time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, follow-up, complications, mortality, lymph node retrieval, and margins.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven articles describing outcomes after MIPD were found, and a total of 285 cases were described. Main malignancy treated was pancreatic adenocarcinoma, accounting for 32% of all cases. Eighty-seven percent were performed totally laparoscopically, and 13% were performed with a hand-assisted approach to facilitate the reconstruction step of the procedure. The rate of conversion to an open procedure was 9%. Estimated blood loss had a weighted average (WA) of 189 mL. Average length of stay had a WA of 12 days, and average follow-up had a WA of 14 months. The overall complication rate was 48%, and the overall mortality rate was 2%. Average lymph nodes retrieved ranged from 7 to 36 nodes, with a WA of 15 nodes, and positive margins of resection were reported to be positive in 0.4% of patients with malignant disease.
CONCLUSIONS: This review found similar outcomes with respect to perioperative morbidity and mortality rates compared to open pancreatoduodenectomies. The oncologic goals of pancreatic resection may be able to be achieved by MIPD, but longer follow-up and larger series are still needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21207166     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1503-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  55 in total

1.  Total laparoscopic partial pancreatoduodenectomy and reconstruction via laparoscopic pancreatogastrostomy.

Authors:  Tobias Keck; Simon Küsters; Ulrich Friedrich Wellner; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Konrad Wojciech Karcz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Evolution of the Whipple procedure at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

Authors:  Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Vicente Morales-Oyarvide; Deborah McGrath; Jennifer A Wargo; Cristina R Ferrone; Sarah P Thayer; Keith D Lillemoe; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Delayed Gastric Emptying After Stapled Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis of Duodenojejunostomy in Pylorus-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Randomized Controlled trial.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Shutaro Hori; Seiji Oguro; Junichi Arita; Yoji Kishi; Satoshi Nara; Minoru Esaki; Akio Saiura; Kazuaki Shimada; Takeharu Yamanaka; Tomoo Kosuge
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond.

Authors:  Erin H Baker; Samuel W Ross; Ramanathan Seshadri; Ryan Z Swan; David A Iannitti; Dionisios Vrochides; John B Martinie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-08

5.  Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander Buia; Florian Stockhausen; Ernst Hanisch
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-12-26

Review 6.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Surgical resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm by minimally invasive surgery-the robotic approach?

Authors:  Roxanne Y A Teo; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 8.  State of the art of robotic pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Luca Milone; Despoina Daskalaki; Xiaoying Wang; Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  A Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hepatic and Pancreatic Resections Among the Medicare Population.

Authors:  Qinyu Chen; Katiuscha Merath; Fabio Bagante; Ozgur Akgul; Mary Dillhoff; Jordan Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Shi Chen; Jiang-Zhi Chen; Qian Zhan; Xia-Xing Deng; Bai-Yong Shen; Cheng-Hong Peng; Hong-Wei Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.