Literature DB >> 21201814

5-Methyl-1-phenyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylic acid.

Jin Rui Lin1, Ji Yuan Yao, Hong Zhao.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(10)H(9)N(3)O(2), was synthesized from azido-benzene and ethyl acetyl-acetate. A pair of hydrogen bonds [2.617 (2) Å] inter-connects a pair of the carboxyl groups, forming an R(2) (2)(8) inversion dimer, a frequent motif in carboxylic acids. In the title structure, the bonding H atom in the aforementioned O-H⋯O hydrogen bond is significantly shifted towards the acceptor O atom [the donor and acceptor O-H distances are 1.25 (4) and 1.38 (4) Å, respectively]. A plot of the O⋯O versus O-H distances in compounds with paired carboxyl groups shows that the title structure belongs to the group of structures with abnormally long O-H distances with regard to the O⋯O contacts. The displacement of the bonding H atom towards the centre of the hydrogen bond is concomitant with more equal C-O bonding distances in the carboxyl group.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21201814      PMCID: PMC2960561          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808027311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature, see: El Khadem et al. (1968 ▶); Olesen et al. (2003 ▶); Tian et al. (2005 ▶); Allen (2002 ▶); Etter et al. (1990 ▶); Radl et al. (2000 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H9N3O2 M = 203.20 Monoclinic, a = 23.616 (3) Å b = 7.7189 (15) Å c = 12.606 (2) Å β = 113.18 (3)° V = 2112.5 (8) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 293 (2) K 0.20 × 0.18 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.965, T max = 0.977 10370 measured reflections 2400 independent reflections 1583 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.053

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.062 wR(F 2) = 0.148 S = 1.08 2400 reflections 141 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.14 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL/PC. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808027311/fb2106sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808027311/fb2106Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H9N3O2F000 = 848
Mr = 203.20Dx = 1.278 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 2025 reflections
a = 23.616 (3) Åθ = 2.8–27.5º
b = 7.7189 (15) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 12.606 (2) ÅT = 293 (2) K
β = 113.18 (3)ºPrism, colourless
V = 2112.5 (8) Å30.20 × 0.18 × 0.15 mm
Z = 8
Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer2400 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1583 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.053
T = 293(2) Kθmax = 27.5º
ω scansθmin = 2.8º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)h = −30→30
Tmin = 0.965, Tmax = 0.977k = −9→10
10370 measured reflectionsl = −16→16
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.062H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.148  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0614P)2 + 0.4952P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2400 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.14 e Å3
141 parametersΔρmin = −0.18 e Å3
31 constraintsExtinction correction: none
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.41473 (10)0.1278 (3)0.72134 (18)0.0555 (5)
C20.34886 (9)0.1172 (3)0.69727 (16)0.0491 (5)
C30.31868 (9)0.1493 (2)0.76949 (15)0.0461 (5)
C40.20319 (9)0.1379 (2)0.72119 (16)0.0466 (5)
C50.20037 (10)0.0713 (3)0.82132 (17)0.0538 (5)
H50.23500.02180.87800.065*
C60.14517 (11)0.0799 (3)0.8352 (2)0.0655 (6)
H60.14260.03640.90200.079*
C70.09414 (11)0.1525 (3)0.7506 (2)0.0761 (7)
H70.05710.15740.76030.091*
C80.09745 (10)0.2184 (3)0.6509 (2)0.0734 (7)
H80.06260.26660.59400.088*
C90.15210 (9)0.2129 (3)0.63569 (18)0.0578 (5)
H90.15470.25850.56950.069*
C100.34155 (10)0.2068 (3)0.89199 (16)0.0579 (6)
H10A0.30990.27160.90410.087*
H10B0.37730.27860.90910.087*
H10C0.35220.10730.94170.087*
N10.30730 (8)0.0743 (2)0.58988 (14)0.0577 (5)
N20.25230 (8)0.0763 (2)0.59058 (13)0.0571 (5)
N30.25867 (7)0.1228 (2)0.70044 (13)0.0475 (4)
O10.45271 (7)0.1465 (2)0.82345 (13)0.0733 (5)
O20.43008 (7)0.1161 (3)0.63484 (13)0.0799 (6)
H20.4867 (19)0.125 (5)0.661 (3)0.193 (17)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0557 (12)0.0670 (14)0.0444 (12)0.0033 (10)0.0201 (10)0.0024 (10)
C20.0508 (11)0.0572 (12)0.0404 (11)0.0029 (9)0.0190 (9)0.0016 (8)
C30.0505 (11)0.0472 (11)0.0407 (10)0.0013 (8)0.0182 (9)0.0020 (8)
C40.0488 (10)0.0506 (11)0.0416 (11)−0.0023 (9)0.0190 (9)−0.0050 (8)
C50.0562 (12)0.0617 (13)0.0443 (11)−0.0008 (9)0.0206 (10)−0.0031 (9)
C60.0660 (14)0.0826 (16)0.0573 (14)−0.0081 (12)0.0343 (12)−0.0071 (11)
C70.0548 (14)0.102 (2)0.0797 (17)−0.0006 (13)0.0350 (14)−0.0096 (15)
C80.0528 (13)0.0884 (18)0.0717 (16)0.0117 (12)0.0165 (12)0.0013 (13)
C90.0566 (13)0.0654 (14)0.0481 (12)0.0046 (10)0.0169 (10)0.0026 (10)
C100.0580 (12)0.0714 (15)0.0429 (11)−0.0024 (10)0.0184 (10)−0.0071 (10)
N10.0544 (10)0.0770 (12)0.0430 (10)0.0019 (9)0.0208 (8)−0.0018 (8)
N20.0567 (11)0.0774 (13)0.0381 (9)−0.0015 (8)0.0196 (8)−0.0064 (8)
N30.0505 (9)0.0554 (10)0.0372 (8)0.0005 (7)0.0178 (7)−0.0002 (7)
O10.0532 (9)0.1133 (14)0.0506 (9)−0.0020 (8)0.0176 (8)−0.0084 (8)
O20.0585 (10)0.1372 (16)0.0504 (9)0.0041 (9)0.0282 (8)0.0032 (9)
C1—O11.254 (2)C6—H60.9300
C1—O21.281 (2)C7—C81.386 (3)
C1—C21.465 (3)C7—H70.9300
C2—N11.364 (3)C8—C91.378 (3)
C2—C31.382 (3)C8—H80.9300
C3—N31.356 (2)C9—H90.9300
C3—C101.489 (3)C10—H10A0.9600
C4—C51.389 (3)C10—H10B0.9600
C4—C91.389 (3)C10—H10C0.9600
C4—N31.438 (2)N1—N21.302 (2)
C5—C61.384 (3)N2—N31.380 (2)
C5—H50.9300O2—H21.25 (4)
C6—C71.376 (3)
O1—C1—O2123.66 (19)C8—C7—H7119.7
O1—C1—C2119.41 (19)C9—C8—C7120.3 (2)
O2—C1—C2116.94 (19)C9—C8—H8119.8
N1—C2—C3109.96 (17)C7—C8—H8119.8
N1—C2—C1120.64 (17)C8—C9—C4118.7 (2)
C3—C2—C1129.38 (19)C8—C9—H9120.7
N3—C3—C2103.29 (16)C4—C9—H9120.7
N3—C3—C10124.88 (17)C3—C10—H10A109.5
C2—C3—C10131.79 (18)C3—C10—H10B109.5
C5—C4—C9121.47 (19)H10A—C10—H10B109.5
C5—C4—N3120.56 (18)C3—C10—H10C109.5
C9—C4—N3117.90 (17)H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C6—C5—C4118.8 (2)H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C6—C5—H5120.6N2—N1—C2108.68 (15)
C4—C5—H5120.6N1—N2—N3107.15 (15)
C7—C6—C5120.2 (2)C3—N3—N2110.92 (15)
C7—C6—H6119.9C3—N3—C4131.92 (16)
C5—C6—H6119.9N2—N3—C4117.15 (15)
C6—C7—C8120.5 (2)C1—O2—H2113.8 (15)
C6—C7—H7119.7
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···O1i1.25 (4)1.38 (4)2.617 (2)173 (3)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯O1i1.25 (4)1.38 (4)2.617 (2)173 (3)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  5 in total

1.  The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising.

Authors:  Frank H Allen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2002-05-29

2.  Synthesis and in vitro characterization of 1-(4-aminofurazan-3-yl)-5-dialkylaminomethyl-1H-[1,2,3]triazole-4-carboxylic acid derivatives. A new class of selective GSK-3 inhibitors.

Authors:  Preben H Olesen; Anders R Sørensen; Birgitte Ursø; Peter Kurtzhals; Andrew N Bowler; Ulrich Ehrbar; Bo F Hansen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Synthesis, characterization and biological activity of triorganotin 2-phenyl-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylates.

Authors:  Laijin Tian; Yuxi Sun; Huijun Li; Xiaoliang Zheng; Yuanzheng Cheng; Xueli Liu; Bochu Qian
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.155

4.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  Graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals.

Authors:  M C Etter; J C MacDonald; J Bernstein
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  1990-04-01
  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  1-Benzyl-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylic acid monohydrate.

Authors:  Hong Zhao
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-05-14

2.  2-(4-Eth-oxy-carbon-yl-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetic acid mono-hydrate.

Authors:  Gai-Gai Wang; Hong Zhao
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-10-31

3.  Bis(5-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carb-oxy-lic acid) monohydrate.

Authors:  Jin Rui Lin
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-07-10

4.  1-Benzyl-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carb-oxy-lic acid.

Authors:  Gai-Gai Wang; Hong Zhao
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-01-11

5.  1-[4-Chloro-3-(trifluoro-meth-yl)phen-yl]-4-phenyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole.

Authors:  Jarrad M Altimari; Peter C Healy; Luke C Henderson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-10-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.