Literature DB >> 21200871

6,6'-oxydichroman.

Meng Wang, Yong-Hao Ye.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(18)H(18)O(3), was synthesized from dichroman in concentrated sulfuric acid. The mol-ecule has a twofold axis passing through the central O atom. The dihedral angle between the two symmetry-related benzene rings is 63.6 (3)°. Weak C-H⋯π inter-actions are present in the structure.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21200871      PMCID: PMC2915355          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807066779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶); Li et al. (2006 ▶, 2007 ▶); Xiao, Shi et al. (2007 ▶); Xiao, Xue et al. (2007 ▶); Huang et al. (2007 ▶); Zhang et al. (2007 ▶); Shi et al. (2007 ▶); Cao et al. (2007 ▶); Ruan et al. (2006 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C18H18O3 M = 282.32 Orthorhombic, a = 17.515 (4) Å b = 29.660 (6) Å c = 5.7680 (12) Å V = 2996.4 (10) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 298 (2) K 0.23 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEX area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.981, T max = 0.983 4727 measured reflections 855 independent reflections 810 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.073

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.073 wR(F 2) = 0.216 S = 1.13 855 reflections 96 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.32 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.55 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996 ▶); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SAINT (Siemens, 1996 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807066779/bq2049sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807066779/bq2049Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C18H18O3F000 = 1200
Mr = 282.32Dx = 1.252 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Fdd2Mo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: F 2 -2dCell parameters from 872 reflections
a = 17.515 (4) Åθ = 2.5–24.3º
b = 29.660 (6) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 5.7680 (12) ÅT = 298 (2) K
V = 2996.4 (10) Å3Prism, colorless
Z = 80.23 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
Bruker APEX area-detector diffractometer855 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube810 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.073
T = 298(2) Kθmax = 26.5º
φ and ω scansθmin = 2.7º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −21→21
Tmin = 0.981, Tmax = 0.983k = −36→32
4727 measured reflectionsl = −7→6
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.073H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.216  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1367P)2 + 4.7011P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.13(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
855 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.32 e Å3
96 parametersΔρmin = −0.55 e Å3
1 restraintExtinction correction: none
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 631 Friedel pairs
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.50000.50000.0623 (13)0.090 (2)
O20.7616 (2)0.44456 (13)0.5838 (9)0.0779 (14)
C10.6782 (2)0.43486 (12)0.2525 (7)0.0378 (9)
C20.6140 (2)0.44952 (12)0.1313 (7)0.0387 (9)
H20.60080.4345−0.00450.046*
C30.5687 (2)0.48541 (13)0.2029 (8)0.0386 (9)
C40.5900 (2)0.50701 (12)0.4073 (8)0.0412 (9)
H40.56090.53100.46150.049*
C50.6539 (2)0.49345 (13)0.5317 (8)0.0413 (9)
H50.66700.50870.66690.050*
C60.69851 (19)0.45734 (12)0.4570 (7)0.0360 (8)
C70.7245 (3)0.39470 (15)0.1747 (9)0.0561 (12)
H7A0.75900.40390.05210.067*
H7B0.69040.37190.11220.067*
C80.7703 (3)0.37452 (17)0.3725 (12)0.0640 (14)
H8A0.73610.35830.47540.077*
H8B0.80670.35310.31040.077*
C90.8113 (3)0.40910 (16)0.5053 (11)0.0614 (15)
H9A0.83550.39510.63840.074*
H9B0.85110.42200.40910.074*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.081 (4)0.128 (5)0.060 (4)0.032 (3)0.0000.000
O20.074 (2)0.075 (2)0.085 (3)0.0149 (17)−0.036 (2)−0.021 (2)
C10.0383 (17)0.0360 (17)0.039 (2)0.0011 (13)−0.0009 (17)−0.0039 (17)
C20.0395 (18)0.0405 (17)0.0360 (19)0.0017 (14)−0.0002 (17)−0.0066 (16)
C30.0315 (16)0.0445 (17)0.040 (2)0.0029 (13)0.0022 (16)0.0016 (17)
C40.0379 (18)0.0384 (17)0.047 (2)0.0051 (14)0.0054 (17)−0.0053 (18)
C50.0408 (19)0.0434 (19)0.040 (2)−0.0047 (15)−0.0021 (17)−0.0125 (17)
C60.0313 (15)0.0370 (16)0.040 (2)−0.0023 (13)−0.0014 (16)0.0013 (16)
C70.065 (3)0.053 (2)0.051 (3)0.019 (2)−0.011 (2)−0.010 (2)
C80.059 (3)0.057 (2)0.076 (4)0.020 (2)−0.010 (3)−0.003 (3)
C90.048 (2)0.064 (3)0.072 (4)0.0163 (19)−0.018 (3)−0.001 (3)
O1—C3i1.514 (5)C4—H40.9300
O1—C31.514 (6)C5—C61.394 (5)
O2—C61.379 (5)C5—H50.9300
O2—C91.438 (6)C7—C81.518 (7)
C1—C21.393 (5)C7—H7A0.9700
C1—C61.401 (6)C7—H7B0.9700
C1—C71.509 (5)C8—C91.468 (7)
C2—C31.390 (5)C8—H8A0.9700
C2—H20.9300C8—H8B0.9700
C3—C41.393 (6)C9—H9A0.9700
C4—C51.388 (6)C9—H9B0.9700
C3i—O1—C3115.2 (6)C5—C6—C1118.9 (3)
C6—O2—C9121.3 (4)C1—C7—C8111.8 (4)
C2—C1—C6118.6 (3)C1—C7—H7A109.3
C2—C1—C7122.0 (4)C8—C7—H7A109.3
C6—C1—C7119.3 (3)C1—C7—H7B109.3
C3—C2—C1123.4 (4)C8—C7—H7B109.3
C3—C2—H2118.3H7A—C7—H7B107.9
C1—C2—H2118.3C9—C8—C7112.1 (4)
C2—C3—C4116.8 (3)C9—C8—H8A109.2
C2—C3—O1120.9 (4)C7—C8—H8A109.2
C4—C3—O1122.4 (4)C9—C8—H8B109.2
C5—C4—C3121.4 (3)C7—C8—H8B109.2
C5—C4—H4119.3H8A—C8—H8B107.9
C3—C4—H4119.3O2—C9—C8112.3 (4)
C4—C5—C6121.0 (4)O2—C9—H9A109.1
C4—C5—H5119.5C8—C9—H9A109.1
C6—C5—H5119.5O2—C9—H9B109.1
O2—C6—C5119.8 (4)C8—C9—H9B109.1
O2—C6—C1121.3 (3)H9A—C9—H9B107.9
C6—C1—C2—C3−0.1 (6)C4—C5—C6—O2−180.0 (4)
C7—C1—C2—C3177.7 (4)C4—C5—C6—C10.3 (6)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.2 (6)C2—C1—C6—O2−179.7 (4)
C1—C2—C3—O1179.4 (3)C7—C1—C6—O22.4 (6)
C3i—O1—C3—C2142.1 (4)C2—C1—C6—C50.1 (5)
C3i—O1—C3—C4−38.3 (3)C7—C1—C6—C5−177.8 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C50.5 (6)C2—C1—C7—C8−158.0 (4)
O1—C3—C4—C5−179.1 (4)C6—C1—C7—C819.9 (6)
C3—C4—C5—C6−0.6 (6)C1—C7—C8—C9−47.3 (6)
C9—O2—C6—C5−176.6 (4)C6—O2—C9—C8−31.5 (7)
C9—O2—C6—C13.2 (7)C7—C8—C9—O253.2 (7)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C8—H8b···Cg1ii0.972.9063.856 (6)166.49
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg1 is the centroid of the ring C1–C6.

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C8—H8BCg1i0.972.913.856 (6)167

Symmetry code: (i) .

  9 in total

1.  Polyphenols based on isoflavones as inhibitors of Helicobacter pylori urease.

Authors:  Zhu-Ping Xiao; Da-Hua Shi; Huan-Qiu Li; Li-Na Zhang; Chen Xu; Hai-Liang Zhu
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of substituted urea derivatives as inhibitors of human-leukemia K562 cells.

Authors:  Ping Cao; Xian-Feng Huang; Hui Ding; Hui-Ming Ge; Huan-Qiu Li; Ban-Feng Ruan; Hai-Liang Zhu
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of a series of resveratrol derivatives.

Authors:  Ban-Feng Ruan; Xian-Feng Huang; Hui Ding; Chen Xu; Hui-Ming Ge; Hai-Liang Zhu; Ren-Xiang Tan
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of a series of genistein derivatives.

Authors:  Huan-Qiu Li; Hui-Ming Ge; Yun-Xi Chen; Chen Xu; Lei Shi; Hui Ding; Hai-Liang Zhu; Ren-Xiang Tan
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Synthesis and antimicrobial activities of Schiff bases derived from 5-chloro-salicylaldehyde.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Hui-Ming Ge; Shu-Hua Tan; Huan-Qiu Li; Yong-Chun Song; Hai-Liang Zhu; Ren-Xiang Tan
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of a series of resveratrol derivatives modified in C2 position.

Authors:  Xian-Feng Huang; Ban-Feng Ruan; Xiao-Ting Wang; Chen Xu; Hui-Ming Ge; Hai-Liang Zhu; Ren-Xiang Tan
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 6.514

7.  Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of novel 7-O-modified genistein derivatives.

Authors:  Li-Na Zhang; Zhu-Ping Xiao; Hui Ding; Hui-Ming Ge; Chen Xu; Hai-Liang Zhu; Ren-Xiang Tan
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Metronidazole-flavonoid derivatives as anti-Helicobacter pylori agents with potent inhibitory activity against HPE-induced interleukin-8 production by AGS cells.

Authors:  Huan-Qiu Li; Chen Xu; Hong-Sen Li; Zhu-Ping Xiao; Lei Shi; Hai-Liang Zhu
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Synthesis, structure, and structure-activity relationship analysis of enamines as potential antibacterials.

Authors:  Zhu-Ping Xiao; Jia-Yu Xue; Shu-Hua Tan; Huan-Qiu Li; Hai-Liang Zhu
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 3.641

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.