Literature DB >> 9771226

Maximum surgical blood ordering schedule in a district general hospital saves money and resources.

N G Richardson1, W N Bradley, D R Donaldson, D F O'Shaughnessy.   

Abstract

A 6-month prospective audit was carried out in three surgical departments of a district general hospital. Over that period, 2720 units of red cells were electively cross-matched, 957 being transfused. The overall cross-match-to-transfusion ratio (CTR) was 2.8, but this varied from over 40 for some gynaecological procedures to 1.5 for major surgical procedures. The average CTR for general surgery was 2.2, orthopaedics 2.3, and obstetrics and gynaecology 5.7. A maximum surgical blood ordering system (MSBOS) was introduced and a second 6-month audit carried out. The number of units cross-matched had fallen by 36% to 1746, with a CTR of 1.8. The change in activity had led to a saving conservatively estimated at 11,616.00 Pounds per annum. Local audit and the introduction of a MSBOS in a district general hospital is an exercise which can demonstrate inefficiencies in blood ordering practices and can lead to large financial savings without detracting from standards of patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9771226      PMCID: PMC2503086     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  4 in total

1.  Efficiency of blood use and prospects for autologous transfusion in general surgery.

Authors:  B Jaffray; P M King; M M Basheer; J Gillon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Efficiency of use of blood for surgery in south and mid Wales.

Authors:  J A Napier; A H Biffin; D Lay
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-09-21

3.  A strategy to reduce inappropriate red blood cell transfusion.

Authors:  K Brandis; B Richards; A Ghent; S Weinstein
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1994-06-06       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 4.  Transfusion decision-making in vascular surgery: blood ordering schedules and the transfusion trigger.

Authors:  R K Spence; J A Carson
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.000

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Implementation of Maximum Surgical Blood Ordering Schedule and an Improvement in Transfusion Practices of Surgeons subsequent to Intervention.

Authors:  Farheen Karim Mahar; Bushra Moiz; Mohammad Khurshid; Tabish Chawla
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Forecasting the Amount of Blood Ordered in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Ward with the Data Mining Approach.

Authors:  Tahmineh Aldaghi; Ghasemi H Morteza; Mehrdad Kargari
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  A study of pre-operative type and screen in breast surgery: improved efficiency and cost saving.

Authors:  R S Prichard; M O'Keefe; R McLaughlin; C Malone; K J Sweeney; M J Kerin
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Are we cross-matching too much blood for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?

Authors:  Emily Lowe; John Quarmby
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2017-01-13

5.  Maximum Surgical Blood Order Schedule for Elective Neurosurgery in a University Teaching Hospital in Northern Thailand.

Authors:  Ananchanok Saringcarinkul; Siriwan Chuasuwan
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

6.  The practice of blood cross-match request and transfusion in surgical patients at Debre Markos comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Debre Markos, Ethiopia, 2021/2022. A prospective study.

Authors:  Abebaw Misganaw; Getamesay Demelash Simegn; Samuel Debas Bayable; Agmuas Aschale; Amare Anilay Beyable; Yitayal Guadie Ashebir; Lamesgen Geta Abate
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.