Literature DB >> 21195662

Low-intensity, short-interval theta burst stimulation modulates excitatory but not inhibitory motor networks.

Sebastian H Doeltgen1, Michael C Ridding.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) administered at a low stimulus intensity can reduce the excitability of short interval intracortical inhibitory (SICI) networks without affecting the facilitatory intracortical motor networks involved in motor evoked potential (MEP) generation. We sought to determine whether low-intensity, facilitatory, short duration cTBS (300 stimuli over 20 s; cTBS(300)) could modulate SICI without influencing cortical circuits involved in MEP generation.
METHODS: MEPs and SICI were assessed at baseline and 5 min and 20 min following cTBS(300) applied at intensities of 60%, 65% or 70% of resting motor threshold (RMT). In addition, the effect of cTBS(300) applied at 60% RMT on low level SICI (20% test MEP suppression) was examined.
RESULTS: Low-intensity cTBS(300) facilitated MEP amplitude when applied at 70% RMT, and inhibited MEP amplitude when applied at 65% RMT. In contrast, none of the cTBS(300) protocols had significant effects on moderate or low levels of SICI.
CONCLUSIONS: The effects of cTBS(300) on MEP generating motor networks are highly sensitive to stimulation intensity. Low-intensity cTBS(300) does not have isolated, facilitatory effects on SICI networks. SIGNIFICANCE: These results further highlight the difficulties of selectively facilitating the inhibitory circuits within M1 that are responsible for SICI with currently available rTMS paradigms.
Copyright © 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21195662     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.12.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  20 in total

1.  Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation in man: making things as simple as possible?

Authors:  Walter Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Asif Jamil; Giorgi Batsikadze; Hsiao-I Kuo; Ludovica Labruna; Alkomiet Hasan; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Unravelling homeostatic interactions in inhibitory and excitatory networks in human motor cortex.

Authors:  Anke Karabanov; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Impact of different intensities of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the cortical properties during TMS-EEG and working memory performance.

Authors:  Sung Wook Chung; Nigel C Rogasch; Kate E Hoy; Caley M Sullivan; Robin F H Cash; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Modulation of cortical motor networks following primed θ burst transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Sebastian H Doeltgen; Michael C Ridding
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Homeostatic metaplasticity of corticospinal excitatory and intracortical inhibitory neural circuits in human motor cortex.

Authors:  Takenobu Murakami; Florian Müller-Dahlhaus; Ming-Kuei Lu; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) for addiction medicine: A consensus paper on the present state of the science and the road ahead.

Authors:  Hamed Ekhtiari; Hosna Tavakoli; Giovanni Addolorato; Chris Baeken; Antonello Bonci; Salvatore Campanella; Luis Castelo-Branco; Gaëlle Challet-Bouju; Vincent P Clark; Eric Claus; Pinhas N Dannon; Alessandra Del Felice; Tess den Uyl; Marco Diana; Massimo di Giannantonio; John R Fedota; Paul Fitzgerald; Luigi Gallimberti; Marie Grall-Bronnec; Sarah C Herremans; Martin J Herrmann; Asif Jamil; Eman Khedr; Christos Kouimtsidis; Karolina Kozak; Evgeny Krupitsky; Claus Lamm; William V Lechner; Graziella Madeo; Nastaran Malmir; Giovanni Martinotti; William M McDonald; Chiara Montemitro; Ester M Nakamura-Palacios; Mohammad Nasehi; Xavier Noël; Masoud Nosratabadi; Martin Paulus; Mauro Pettorruso; Basant Pradhan; Samir K Praharaj; Haley Rafferty; Gregory Sahlem; Betty Jo Salmeron; Anne Sauvaget; Renée S Schluter; Carmen Sergiou; Alireza Shahbabaie; Christine Sheffer; Primavera A Spagnolo; Vaughn R Steele; Ti-Fei Yuan; Josanne D M van Dongen; Vincent Van Waes; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Antonio Verdejo-García; Ilse Verveer; Justine W Welsh; Michael J Wesley; Katie Witkiewitz; Fatemeh Yavari; Mohammad-Reza Zarrindast; Laurie Zawertailo; Xiaochu Zhang; Yoon-Hee Cha; Tony P George; Flavio Frohlich; Anna E Goudriaan; Shirley Fecteau; Stacey B Daughters; Elliot A Stein; Felipe Fregni; Michael A Nitsche; Abraham Zangen; Marom Bikson; Colleen A Hanlon
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.

Authors:  G Batsikadze; V Moliadze; W Paulus; M-F Kuo; M A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Augmenting Plasticity Induction in Human Motor Cortex by Disinhibition Stimulation.

Authors:  Robin F H Cash; Takenobu Murakami; Robert Chen; Gary W Thickbroom; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Reproducibility of the effects of theta burst stimulation on motor cortical plasticity in healthy participants.

Authors:  Marine Vernet; Shahid Bashir; Woo-Kyoung Yoo; Lindsay Oberman; Ilan Mizrahi; Frederick Ifert-Miller; Charles J Beck; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.