Literature DB >> 20810605

Detection of early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

David V Gold1, Michael Goggins, David E Modrak, Guy Newsome, Mengling Liu, Chanjuan Shi, Ralph H Hruban, David M Goldenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an almost universally lethal disease, in large part, due to our inability to detect early-stage disease. Monoclonal antibody PAM4 is reactive with a unique biomarker expressed by >85% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas. In this report, we examined the ability of a PAM4-based immunoassay to detect early-stage disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PAM4-based immunoassay was used to quantitate antigen in the serum of healthy volunteers (n = 19), patients with known pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 68), and patients with a primary diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis (n = 29).
RESULTS: Sensitivity for detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 82%, with a false-positive rate of 5% for healthy controls. Patients with advanced disease had significantly higher antigen levels than those with early-stage disease (P < 0.01), with a diagnostic sensitivity of 91%, 86%, and 62% for stage 3/stage 4 advanced disease, stage 2, and stage 1, respectively. We also evaluated chronic pancreatitis sera, finding 38% positive for antigen; however, this was discordant with immunohistochemical findings that suggest the PAM4 antigen is not produced by inflamed pancreatic tissue. Furthermore, several of the serum-positive pancreatitis patients, for whom tissue specimens were available for pathologic interpretation, had evidence of neoplastic precursor lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the use of the PAM4 serum assay to detect early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma and that positive levels of PAM4 antigen are not derived from inflamed pancreatic tissues but rather may provide evidence of subclinical pancreatic neoplasia. EFFECT: The ability to detect pancreatic adenocarcinoma at an early stage could provide for early therapeutic intervention with potentially improved patient outcomes. ©2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20810605      PMCID: PMC2976815          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  31 in total

1.  Early diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic dysplasia in patients with a family history of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  T A Brentnall; M P Bronner; D R Byrd; R C Haggitt; M B Kimmey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-08-17       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  New MUC1 serum immunoassay differentiates pancreatic cancer from pancreatitis.

Authors:  David V Gold; David E Modrak; Zhiliang Ying; Thomas M Cardillo; Robert M Sharkey; David M Goldenberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Localization of pancreatic cancer with radiolabeled monoclonal antibody PAM4.

Authors:  D V Gold; T Cardillo; D M Goldenberg; R M Sharkey
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Germline BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with apparently sporadic pancreatic carcinomas.

Authors:  M Goggins; M Schutte; J Lu; C A Moskaluk; C L Weinstein; G M Petersen; C J Yeo; C E Jackson; H T Lynch; R H Hruban; S E Kern
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  The prevalence of BRCA2 mutations in familial pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Fergus J Couch; Michele R Johnson; Kari G Rabe; Kieran Brune; Mariza de Andrade; Michael Goggins; Heidi Rothenmund; Steven Gallinger; Alison Klein; Gloria M Petersen; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  PALB2 mutations in European familial pancreatic cancer families.

Authors:  E P Slater; P Langer; E Niemczyk; K Strauch; J Butler; N Habbe; J P Neoptolemos; W Greenhalf; D K Bartsch
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Evaluation of candidate genes MAP2K4, MADH4, ACVR1B, and BRCA2 in familial pancreatic cancer: deleterious BRCA2 mutations in 17%.

Authors:  Kathleen M Murphy; Kieran A Brune; Constance Griffin; Jennifer E Sollenberger; Gloria M Petersen; Ravi Bansal; Ralph H Hruban; Scott E Kern
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Pancreatitis and the risk of pancreatic cancer. International Pancreatitis Study Group.

Authors:  A B Lowenfels; P Maisonneuve; G Cavallini; R W Ammann; P G Lankisch; J R Andersen; E P Dimagno; A Andrén-Sandberg; L Domellöf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Serum fatty acid synthase as a marker of pancreatic neoplasia.

Authors:  Kim Walter; Seung-Mo Hong; Sinead Nyhan; Marcia Canto; Neal Fedarko; Alison Klein; Margaret Griffith; Noriyuki Omura; Susan Medghalchi; Frank Kuhajda; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  29 in total

1.  Sequential Validation of Blood-Based Protein Biomarker Candidates for Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Michela Capello; Leonidas E Bantis; Ghislaine Scelo; Yang Zhao; Peng Li; Dilsher S Dhillon; Nikul J Patel; Deepali L Kundnani; Hong Wang; James L Abbruzzese; Anirban Maitra; Margaret A Tempero; Randall Brand; Matthew A Firpo; Sean J Mulvihill; Matthew H Katz; Paul Brennan; Ziding Feng; Ayumu Taguchi; Samir M Hanash
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Human pancreatic cancer fusion 2 (HPC2) 1-B3: a novel monoclonal antibody to screen for pancreatic ductal dysplasia.

Authors:  Terry K Morgan; Karin Hardiman; Christopher L Corless; Sandra L White; Robert Bonnah; Henry Van de Vrugt; Brett C Sheppard; Markus Grompe; Ediz F Cosar; Philip R Streeter
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  From conventional chemotherapy to targeted therapy: use of monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) in gastrointestinal (GI) tumors.

Authors:  Federica Zoratto; L Rossi; E Giordani; M Strudel; A Papa; S Tomao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-26

Review 4.  Pancreatic cancer screening.

Authors:  Eun Ji Shin; Marcia Irene Canto
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.806

5.  Transmembrane mucins as novel therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Pamela E Constantinou; Brian P Danysh; Neeraja Dharmaraj; Daniel D Carson
Journal:  Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-11

Review 6.  Strategies for discovering novel pancreatic cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Alison Chan; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Ivan M Blasutig
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Comparing the benefits of screening for breast cancer and lung cancer using a novel natural history model.

Authors:  Ray S Lin; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Clinical implications of mismatched repair gene promoter methylation in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  M Li; Z W Zhao
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  Serum biomarkers for improved diagnostic of pancreatic cancer: a current overview.

Authors:  S Bünger; T Laubert; U J Roblick; J K Habermann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 10.  Pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Donghui Li; Keping Xie; Robert Wolff; James L Abbruzzese
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.