Literature DB >> 26577828

Prognostic implication of serum hepatocyte growth factor in stage II/III breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Hyori Kim1, Jeonghwan Youk2, Yaewon Yang2, Tae-Yong Kim3,4, Ahrum Min1, Hye-Seon Ham1, Seongcheol Cho2, Kyung-Hun Lee1,2, Bhumsuk Keam1,2, Sae-Won Han1,2, Do-Youn Oh1,2, Han Suk Ryu5, Wonshik Han1,6, In Ae Park1,5, Tae-You Kim1,2, Dong-Young Noh1,6, Seock-Ah Im7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In stage II/III breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment. Although several biomarkers are used to predict prognosis in breast cancer, there is no reliable predictive biomarker for NAC success. Recently, the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and cMet signaling pathway demonstrated to be involved in breast cancer tumor progression, and its potential as a biomarker is under active investigation. In this study, we assessed the potential of serum HGF as a prognostic biomarker for NAC efficacy.
METHODS: Venous blood samples were drawn from patients diagnosed with stage II/III breast cancer and treated with NAC in Seoul National University Hospital from August 2004 to November 2009. Serum HGF level was determined using an ELISA system. We reviewed the medical records of the patients and investigated the association of HGF level with patients' clinicopathologic characteristics.
RESULTS: A total of 121 female patients (median age = 45 years old) were included. Median level of HGF was 934 pg/ml (lower quartile: 772, upper quartile: 1145 pg/ml). Patients with higher HGF level than median value were significantly more likely to have clinically detectable regional node metastasis (p = 0.017, Fisher's exact test). Patients with complete and partial response according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th Edition criteria tended to have higher HGF level (p = 0.105 by t test). Patients with an HGF level higher than the upper quartile value had longer relapse-free survival than the other patients (106 vs. 85 months, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: High serum HGF levels in breast cancer patients are associated with clinically detectable regional node metastasis and, paradoxically, with longer relapse-free survival in stage II/III breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF); Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC); Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26577828     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-2072-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  38 in total

Review 1.  Hepatocyte growth factor: from diagnosis to clinical applications.

Authors:  Hiroshi Funakoshi; Toshikazu Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.786

2.  Structural basis for agonism and antagonism of hepatocyte growth factor.

Authors:  W David Tolbert; Jennifer Daugherty-Holtrop; Ermanno Gherardi; George Vande Woude; H Eric Xu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  cMET and phospho-cMET protein levels in breast cancers and survival outcomes.

Authors:  Kanwal P Raghav; Wenting Wang; Shuying Liu; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Xiaolong Meng; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Gordon B Mills; Funda Meric-Bernstam; George R Blumenschein; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Prediction of response to antiestrogen therapy in advanced breast cancer patients by pretreatment circulating levels of extracellular domain of the HER-2/c-neu protein.

Authors:  H Yamauchi; A O'Neill; R Gelman; W Carney; D Y Tenney; S Hösch; D F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Effect of c-erbB(2) and estrogen receptor status on survival of women with primary breast cancer treated with adjuvant cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil.

Authors:  D W Miles; W H Harris; C E Gillett; P Smith; D M Barnes
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1999-08-20       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Preexistence and clonal selection of MET amplification in EGFR mutant NSCLC.

Authors:  Alexa B Turke; Kreshnik Zejnullahu; Yi-Long Wu; Youngchul Song; Dora Dias-Santagata; Eugene Lifshits; Luca Toschi; Andrew Rogers; Tony Mok; Lecia Sequist; Neal I Lindeman; Carly Murphy; Sara Akhavanfard; Beow Y Yeap; Yun Xiao; Marzia Capelletti; A John Iafrate; Charles Lee; James G Christensen; Jeffrey A Engelman; Pasi A Jänne
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Clinical usefulness of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Bhumsuk Keam; Seock-Ah Im; Yoojoo Lim; Sae-Won Han; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Do-Youn Oh; Nariya Cho; Se-Hoon Lee; Wonshik Han; Woo Kyung Moon; Dong-Wan Kim; Tae-You Kim; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  B A Gusterson; R D Gelber; A Goldhirsch; K N Price; J Säve-Söderborgh; R Anbazhagan; J Styles; C M Rudenstam; R Golouh; R Reed
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2012.

Authors:  Kyu-Won Jung; Young-Joo Won; Hyun-Joo Kong; Chang-Mo Oh; Hyunsoon Cho; Duk Hyoung Lee; Kang Hyun Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.679

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Hepatocyte growth factor/MET in cancer progression and biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Kunio Matsumoto; Masataka Umitsu; Dinuka M De Silva; Arpita Roy; Donald P Bottaro
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 6.716

2.  Clinical impact of high serum hepatocyte growth factor in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Takahiro Tsuji; Yuichi Sakamori; Hiroaki Ozasa; Yoshitaka Yagi; Hitomi Ajimizu; Yuto Yasuda; Tomoko Funazo; Takashi Nomizo; Hironori Yoshida; Hiroki Nagai; Ken Maeno; Tetsuya Oguri; Toyohiro Hirai; Young Hak Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-16

Review 3.  Predictors of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Weilin Xu; Xiu Chen; Fei Deng; Jian Zhang; Wei Zhang; Jinhai Tang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Circulating proteins as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yannick Bidet; Nina Radosevic-Robin; Xavier Durando; Hugo Veyssière; Frederique Penault-Llorca
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 5.000

Review 5.  HGF/c-MET pathway in cancer: from molecular characterization to clinical evidence.

Authors:  Jianjiang Fu; Xiaorui Su; Zhihua Li; Ling Deng; Xiawei Liu; Xuancheng Feng; Juan Peng
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Expression of HGF, pMet, and pAkt is related to benefit of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a long-term follow-up of the SweBCG91-RT randomised trial.

Authors:  Martin Sjöström; Cynthia Veenstra; Erik Holmberg; Per Karlsson; Fredrika Killander; Per Malmström; Emma Niméus; Mårten Fernö; Olle Stål
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 7.449

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.