Hyori Kim1, Jeonghwan Youk2, Yaewon Yang2, Tae-Yong Kim3,4, Ahrum Min1, Hye-Seon Ham1, Seongcheol Cho2, Kyung-Hun Lee1,2, Bhumsuk Keam1,2, Sae-Won Han1,2, Do-Youn Oh1,2, Han Suk Ryu5, Wonshik Han1,6, In Ae Park1,5, Tae-You Kim1,2, Dong-Young Noh1,6, Seock-Ah Im7,8. 1. Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-799, Korea. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehakro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. 3. Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-799, Korea. ktyongmd@gmail.com. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehakro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. ktyongmd@gmail.com. 5. Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehakro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. 6. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehakro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. 7. Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-799, Korea. moisa@snu.ac.kr. 8. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehakro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. moisa@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In stage II/III breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment. Although several biomarkers are used to predict prognosis in breast cancer, there is no reliable predictive biomarker for NAC success. Recently, the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and cMet signaling pathway demonstrated to be involved in breast cancer tumor progression, and its potential as a biomarker is under active investigation. In this study, we assessed the potential of serum HGF as a prognostic biomarker for NAC efficacy. METHODS: Venous blood samples were drawn from patients diagnosed with stage II/III breast cancer and treated with NAC in Seoul National University Hospital from August 2004 to November 2009. Serum HGF level was determined using an ELISA system. We reviewed the medical records of the patients and investigated the association of HGF level with patients' clinicopathologic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 121 female patients (median age = 45 years old) were included. Median level of HGF was 934 pg/ml (lower quartile: 772, upper quartile: 1145 pg/ml). Patients with higher HGF level than median value were significantly more likely to have clinically detectable regional node metastasis (p = 0.017, Fisher's exact test). Patients with complete and partial response according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th Edition criteria tended to have higher HGF level (p = 0.105 by t test). Patients with an HGF level higher than the upper quartile value had longer relapse-free survival than the other patients (106 vs. 85 months, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: High serum HGF levels in breast cancer patients are associated with clinically detectable regional node metastasis and, paradoxically, with longer relapse-free survival in stage II/III breast cancer.
PURPOSE: In stage II/III breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment. Although several biomarkers are used to predict prognosis in breast cancer, there is no reliable predictive biomarker for NAC success. Recently, the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and cMet signaling pathway demonstrated to be involved in breast cancer tumor progression, and its potential as a biomarker is under active investigation. In this study, we assessed the potential of serum HGF as a prognostic biomarker for NAC efficacy. METHODS: Venous blood samples were drawn from patients diagnosed with stage II/III breast cancer and treated with NAC in Seoul National University Hospital from August 2004 to November 2009. Serum HGF level was determined using an ELISA system. We reviewed the medical records of the patients and investigated the association of HGF level with patients' clinicopathologic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 121 female patients (median age = 45 years old) were included. Median level of HGF was 934 pg/ml (lower quartile: 772, upper quartile: 1145 pg/ml). Patients with higher HGF level than median value were significantly more likely to have clinically detectable regional node metastasis (p = 0.017, Fisher's exact test). Patients with complete and partial response according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th Edition criteria tended to have higher HGF level (p = 0.105 by t test). Patients with an HGF level higher than the upper quartile value had longer relapse-free survival than the other patients (106 vs. 85 months, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: High serum HGF levels in breast cancerpatients are associated with clinically detectable regional node metastasis and, paradoxically, with longer relapse-free survival in stage II/III breast cancer.
Authors: W David Tolbert; Jennifer Daugherty-Holtrop; Ermanno Gherardi; George Vande Woude; H Eric Xu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-07-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kanwal P Raghav; Wenting Wang; Shuying Liu; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Xiaolong Meng; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Gordon B Mills; Funda Meric-Bernstam; George R Blumenschein; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-12-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alexa B Turke; Kreshnik Zejnullahu; Yi-Long Wu; Youngchul Song; Dora Dias-Santagata; Eugene Lifshits; Luca Toschi; Andrew Rogers; Tony Mok; Lecia Sequist; Neal I Lindeman; Carly Murphy; Sara Akhavanfard; Beow Y Yeap; Yun Xiao; Marzia Capelletti; A John Iafrate; Charles Lee; James G Christensen; Jeffrey A Engelman; Pasi A Jänne Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: B A Gusterson; R D Gelber; A Goldhirsch; K N Price; J Säve-Söderborgh; R Anbazhagan; J Styles; C M Rudenstam; R Golouh; R Reed Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1992-07 Impact factor: 44.544