Literature DB >> 21193906

An alternative treatment for high-burden ureteral stones: percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy.

Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu1, Mehmet Resit Goren, Tufan Cicek, Bulent Ozturk, Hakan Ozkardes.   

Abstract

The treatment of large proximal ureteral stones continues to be controversial. We evaluated the antegrade percutaneous approaches for the proximal ureteral stones in our clinic. In this study, 73 percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy (PAU) operations applied to proximal ureteral stones between February 2005 and December 2009 were included. The stones were located between ureteropelvic junction and 4th lumbar vertebra. PAUs were applied through appropriate calyx with the patients in prone position. During operations, amplatz dilatators were used for dilatation, and pneumatic lithotripter was used for stone fragmentation. Patients were evaluated according to their success rate, complications, hospitalization period, and preference of drainage tube etc. Patients' mean age was 52.21 years, the mean stone diameter was 19.47 mm (range 15-25), the mean stone burden was 283.76 ± 49.12 mm(2) (mean ± SD) (range 188.5-392.7) and the mean hospitalization time 1.69 days. Single access done in 68 patients and two accesses were needed in 5 patients. Sixty-eight patients (93.1%) became stone-free. Nephrostomy tubes were placed in 12 patients after operation, while tubeless approach was preferred in 61 patients. Complications were seen in five patients. There were not any complications reported during the follow-up period. PAU is an effective and safe treatment modality if appropriate calyx access was performed. The possibility of renal stone treatment in the same session is an important advantage of this modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21193906     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-010-0351-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  14 in total

Review 1.  Treatment selection and outcomes: ureteral calculi.

Authors:  J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 2.  Minimally invasive approaches to upper urinary tract urolithiasis.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Wignall; Benjamin K Canales; John D Denstedt; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.

Authors:  Yung-Shun Juan; Jung-Tsung Shen; Ching-Chia Li; Chii-Jye Wang; Shu-Mien Chuang; Chun-Hsiung Huang; Wen-Jeng Wu
Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.744

4.  Percutaneous ureterolitholapaxy: the best bet to clear large bulk impacted upper ureteral calculi.

Authors:  V Kumar; R Ahlawat; G K Banjeree; R P Bhaduria; A Elhence; M Bhandari
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.436

5.  Percutaneous ureterolithotomy: direct method for removal of impacted ureteral stones.

Authors:  C S Tóth; A Varga; T Flaskó; B Tállai; M A Salah; I Kocsis
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones?

Authors:  Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Mert Ali Karadag; Ahmet Hamdi Tefekli; Fatih Altunrende; Adem Tok; Yalcin Berberoglu
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.369

7.  Management of impacted upper ureteric calculi: results of lithotripsy and percutaneous litholapaxy.

Authors:  A Srivastava; R Ahlawat; A Kumar; R Kapoor; M Bhandari
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1992-09

Review 8.  Shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi: an old discussion revisited.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai; George E Haleblian; Glenn M Preminger; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Proximal ureteral calculi: shock wave or ureterolithotripsy?

Authors:  Renato N Pedro; Nelson Rodrigues Netto
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Effectiveness of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu; Bulent Ozturk; Murat Gonen; Tufan Cicek; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.370

View more
  1 in total

1.  Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Jiachao Guo; Henglong Hu; Yuchao Lu; Jiaqiao Zhang; Baolong Qin; Yufeng Wang; Zongbiao Zhang; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.