Literature DB >> 1422683

Management of impacted upper ureteric calculi: results of lithotripsy and percutaneous litholapaxy.

A Srivastava1, R Ahlawat, A Kumar, R Kapoor, M Bhandari.   

Abstract

Despite the availability of lithotripsy and endourology, clear guidelines on the management of impacted upper ureteric calculi are lacking. In this study, 51 upper ureteric calculi treated with in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) were classified according to the degree of impaction as indicated by proximal back pressure changes. Patients with mild proximal hydronephrosis (or none at all) had a success rate of 93% but only 35% of those in the impacted group (moderate to severe hydronephrosis) had a successful outcome. A percutaneous antegrade approach to 29 impacted upper ureteric calculi resulted in total clearance in 23 cases; 4 other patients were rendered stone-free following additional procedures, an overall success rate of 93%. The only complication was a ureteric stricture in 1 patient. We recommend the percutaneous approach in the management of impacted upper ureteric calculi.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1422683     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1992.tb15726.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  9 in total

1.  Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Mingqing Wang; Qiduo Shi; Xuguang Wang; Kun Yang; Rui Yang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-18

2.  An alternative treatment for high-burden ureteral stones: percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu; Mehmet Resit Goren; Tufan Cicek; Bulent Ozturk; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-12-31

3.  Abdominal fat distribution on computed tomography predicts ureteric calculus fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Hsu-Cheng Juan; Hung-Yu Lin; Yii-Her Chou; Yi-Hsin Yang; Paul Ming-Chen Shih; Shu-Mien Chuang; Jung-Tsung Shen; Yung-Shun Juan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Comparative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for proximal and distal ureteric stones.

Authors:  Burak Turna; Kaan Akbay; Fatih Ekren; Oktay Nazli; Erdal Apaydin; Bülent Semerci; Gürhan Günaydin; Ibrahim Cüreklibatir
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Impact of Pretreatment Hydronephrosis on the Success Rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Ureteral Stone.

Authors:  Ki Don Chang; Joo Yong Lee; Sung Yoon Park; Dong Hyuk Kang; Hyung Ho Lee; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Experience with impacted upper ureteral stones; should we abandon using semirigid ureteroscopes and pneumatic lithoclast?

Authors:  Ehab Elganainy; Diaa A Hameed; Ma Elgammal; Alaa A Abd-Elsayed; M Shalaby
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2009-05-03

7.  Radiological noninvasive assessment of ureteral stone impaction into the ureteric wall: A critical evaluation with objective radiological parameters.

Authors:  Ozlem Elibol; Kadihan Yalcin Safak; Ayse Buz; Bilal Eryildirim; Kutluhan Erdem; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-07-31

8.  Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones.

Authors:  Hemant Goel; Sumit Gahlawat; Malay Kumar Bera; Dilip Kumar Pal; Onam Aggarwal
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 9.  Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Luke F Reynolds; Tad Kroczak; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-09-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.