Literature DB >> 21193597

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib mesylate: apparent diffusion coefficient in the evaluation of therapy response in patients.

Lei Tang1, Xiao-Peng Zhang, Ying-Shi Sun, Lin Shen, Jian Li, Li-Ping Qi, Yong Cui.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the use of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as an early response indicator in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) treated with imatinib mesylate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed in 32 patients with GISTs before and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib mesylate. The measurable lesions were classified as having responded well or poorly according to size alterations at clinical evaluation following the first round of treatment (3 months). A linear mixed-effects model was applied to analyze changes in the ADCs of tumors during treatment and to compare the variation and slopes of the time-dependent ADC curves between the good- and poor-response groups.
RESULTS: There were 56 lesions in the good-response group and 35 in the poor-response group. An early (1 week after therapy) noticeable and statistically significant (P < .001) increase in the ADC was observed in the good-response group (median ADC increase, 44.8%) but not in the poor-response group (median ADC increase, 1.5%). The time-dependent ADC variation was significantly different between the good- and poor-response groups, with a sharper median ADC increase displayed in the former (week 1: 44.8% vs 1.5%; week 4: 80.4% vs 7.8%; week 12: 89.6% vs 16.7%; F = 25.78, P < .001). The largest difference in the weekly percentage increase in ADC between the good- and poor-response groups was observed at 1 week after therapy (week 0-1: 44.8% vs 1.5%; week 1-4: 7.0% vs 2.8%; week 4-12: 1.6% vs 0.7%). The pretherapy mean ADC (± standard deviation) of lesions in the good-response group (1.06 [×10(-3) mm(2)/sec] ± 0.27) was significantly lower than that in the poor-response group (1.24 [×10(-3) mm(2)/sec] ± 0.32) (F = 8.34, P = .005).
CONCLUSION: Comparatively low pretherapy ADC and marked ADC increase at 1 week after therapy is associated with good response to imatinib mesylate in patients with GISTs. © RSNA, 2010.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21193597     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  Rapid dramatic alterations to the tumor microstructure in pancreatic cancer following irreversible electroporation ablation.

Authors:  Zhuoli Zhang; Weiguo Li; Daniel Procissi; Patrick Tyler; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 2.  Diffusion MRI of cancer: From low to high b-values.

Authors:  Lei Tang; Xiaohong Joe Zhou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Imatinib mesylate in clinically suspected gastric stromal tumors.

Authors:  Zi-Yu Li; Lei Tang; Shuang-Xi Li; Fei Shan; Zhao-De Bu; Jia-Fu Ji
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Non-Gaussian diffusion imaging with a fractional order calculus model to predict response of gastrointestinal stromal tumor to second-line sunitinib therapy.

Authors:  Lei Tang; Yi Sui; Zheng Zhong; Frederick C Damen; Jian Li; Lin Shen; Yingshi Sun; Xiaohong Joe Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive radiological review.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Shinichi Ota; Michio Yamasaki; Bolorkhand Batsaikhan; Akira Furukawa; Yoshiyuki Watanabe
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Apparent diffusion coefficient modifications in assessing gastro-oesophageal cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment: comparison with tumour regression grade at histology.

Authors:  Francesco De Cobelli; Francesco Giganti; Elena Orsenigo; Michaela Cellina; Antonio Esposito; Giulia Agostini; Luca Albarello; Elena Mazza; Alessandro Ambrosi; Carlo Socci; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Implementation of dual-source RF excitation in 3 T MR-scanners allows for nearly identical ADC values compared to 1.5 T MR scanners in the abdomen.

Authors:  Raghuram K Rao; Philipp Riffel; Mathias Meyer; Paul J Kettnaker; Andreas Lemke; Stefan Haneder; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Diffusion-weighted MRI for imaging cell death after cytotoxic or apoptosis-inducing therapy.

Authors:  E Papaevangelou; G S Almeida; Y Jamin; S P Robinson; N M deSouza
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Utility of noncontrast MRI in the detection and risk grading of gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  Ziling Zhou; Jingyu Lu; John N Morelli; Daoyu Hu; Zhen Li; Peng Xiao; Xuemei Hu; Yaqi Shen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

10.  Consensus report on the radiological management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): recommendations of the German GIST Imaging Working Group.

Authors:  Janine Kalkmann; Martin Zeile; Gerald Antoch; Frank Berger; Stefan Diederich; Dietmar Dinter; Christian Fink; Rolf Janka; Jörg Stattaus
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.