OBJECTIVE: To determine if the combination of lifestyle (caloric restriction and exercise) and metformin (MET) would be superior to lifestyle and placebo (PBO) in improving the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) phenotype. DESIGN: Double-blind randomized 6-month trial of MET versus PBO. SETTING: Two academic medical centers. PATIENT(S): One hundred fourteen subjects with PCOS were randomized to MET (N = 55) or PBO (N = 59). INTERVENTION(S): Subjects collected urine daily for ovulation monitoring, had monthly monitoring of hormones and weight and determination of body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, glucose tolerance, and were evaluated for quality of life at baseline and completion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ovulation rates and testosterone levels. RESULT(S): Dropout rates were high. There was no significant difference in ovulation rates. Testosterone levels were significantly lower compared with baseline in the MET group at 3 mos but not at 6 mos. There were no differences in weight loss between groups, but MET showed a significant decline at 6 months compared with baseline (-3.4 kg, 95% confidence interval -5.3 to -1.5 kg). We noted divergent effects of MET versus PBO on oral glucose tolerance test indices of insulin sensitivity (increased) and secretion (worsened). Total bone mineral density increased significantly in MET. There were no differences in quality of life measures between the groups. The MET group had increased diarrhea and headache, but fewer bladder infections and musculoskeletal complaints. CONCLUSION(S): The addition of metformin to lifestyle therapy produced little reproductive or glycemic benefit in women with PCOS, although our study had limited power owing to a high dropout rate. It is not possible at baseline to identify women likely to drop out.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine if the combination of lifestyle (caloric restriction and exercise) and metformin (MET) would be superior to lifestyle and placebo (PBO) in improving the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) phenotype. DESIGN: Double-blind randomized 6-month trial of MET versus PBO. SETTING: Two academic medical centers. PATIENT(S): One hundred fourteen subjects with PCOS were randomized to MET (N = 55) or PBO (N = 59). INTERVENTION(S): Subjects collected urine daily for ovulation monitoring, had monthly monitoring of hormones and weight and determination of body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, glucose tolerance, and were evaluated for quality of life at baseline and completion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ovulation rates and testosterone levels. RESULT(S): Dropout rates were high. There was no significant difference in ovulation rates. Testosterone levels were significantly lower compared with baseline in the MET group at 3 mos but not at 6 mos. There were no differences in weight loss between groups, but MET showed a significant decline at 6 months compared with baseline (-3.4 kg, 95% confidence interval -5.3 to -1.5 kg). We noted divergent effects of MET versus PBO on oral glucose tolerance test indices of insulin sensitivity (increased) and secretion (worsened). Total bone mineral density increased significantly in MET. There were no differences in quality of life measures between the groups. The MET group had increased diarrhea and headache, but fewer bladder infections and musculoskeletal complaints. CONCLUSION(S): The addition of metformin to lifestyle therapy produced little reproductive or glycemic benefit in women with PCOS, although our study had limited power owing to a high dropout rate. It is not possible at baseline to identify women likely to drop out.
Authors: Diane Thiboutot; Andrea Zaenglein; Jonathan Weiss; Guy Webster; Barry Calvarese; Diana Chen Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2008-09-20 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: S Palomba; F Giallauria; A Falbo; T Russo; R Oppedisano; A Tolino; A Colao; C Vigorito; F Zullo; F Orio Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2007-12-23 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Rebecca L Thomson; Jonathan D Buckley; Manny Noakes; Peter M Clifton; Robert J Norman; Grant D Brinkworth Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-06-26 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Heather I Katcher; Allen R Kunselman; Romana Dmitrovic; Laurence M Demers; Carol L Gnatuk; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Richard S Legro Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Lourdes Ibáñez; Abel López-Bermejo; Marta Díaz; Maria Victoria Marcos; Francis de Zegher Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Lisa J Moran; Renato Pasquali; Helena J Teede; Kathleen M Hoeger; Robert J Norman Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2008-12-04 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Gwinnett Ladson; William C Dodson; Stephanie D Sweet; Anthony E Archibong; Allen R Kunselman; Laurence M Demers; Peter A Lee; Nancy I Williams; Ponjola Coney; Richard S Legro Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Juan Pablo Domecq; Gabriela Prutsky; Rebecca J Mullan; Vishnu Sundaresh; Amy T Wang; Patricia J Erwin; Corrine Welt; David Ehrmann; Victor M Montori; Mohammad Hassan Murad Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Richard S Legro; William C Dodson; Carol L Gnatuk; Stephanie J Estes; Allen R Kunselman; Juliana W Meadows; James S Kesner; Edward F Krieg; Ann M Rogers; Randy S Haluck; Robert N Cooney Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 5.958