STUDY DESIGN: An experimental study using a sheep cervical spine interbody fusion model. OBJECTIVE: To compare allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells combined with hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP) with HA/TCP alone or iliac crest autograft (AG) for cervical interbody fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: We investigated the effect of mesenchymal precursor cells on cervical fusion because of the shortcomings of using iliac crest (donor site morbidity), bone substitute (poor osteoinductive properties), and bone morphogenic proteins (serious complications). METHODS: Thirty ewes were divided randomly into four groups of six having C3-C4 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a Fidji cage packed with, AG, HA/TCP, HA/TCP containing 5 million MPCs, and HA/TCP containing 10 million MPCs. MPCs were derived from a single batch of immuno-selected and culture-expanded MPCs isolated from bone marrow of out-bred sheep. The fifth group were nonoperated controls. Safety, fusion parameters, and biomechanics were assessed. RESULTS: No cell-related adverse events were observed. No significant differences were found between the five or 10 million MPC groups. Evaluation of fusion by CT scan at 3 months showed that 9 of 12 (75%) MPC-treated animals had continuous bony bridging compared with only 1 of 6 AG and 2 of 6 HA/TCP (P = 0.019 and P = 0.044, respectively). By quantitative CT, density of new bone in MPC-treated animals was 121% higher than in HA/TCP (P = 0.017) and 128% higher than in AG (P < 0.0001). Functional radiology at 3 months revealed that MPC-treated animals had significantly reduced macromotion at C3/4 compared with AG and HA/TCP groups combined (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Implantation of allogeneic MPCs when combined with HA/TCP and an interbody spacer facilitates new bone formation after discectomy without any cell-related complications. The earlier and dense new bone formation observed with MPCs relative to autograft and HA/TCP alone suggest that this approach may offer therapeutic benefit.
STUDY DESIGN: An experimental study using a sheep cervical spine interbody fusion model. OBJECTIVE: To compare allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells combined with hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP) with HA/TCP alone or iliac crest autograft (AG) for cervical interbody fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: We investigated the effect of mesenchymal precursor cells on cervical fusion because of the shortcomings of using iliac crest (donor site morbidity), bone substitute (poor osteoinductive properties), and bone morphogenic proteins (serious complications). METHODS: Thirty ewes were divided randomly into four groups of six having C3-C4 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a Fidji cage packed with, AG, HA/TCP, HA/TCP containing 5 million MPCs, and HA/TCP containing 10 million MPCs. MPCs were derived from a single batch of immuno-selected and culture-expanded MPCs isolated from bone marrow of out-bred sheep. The fifth group were nonoperated controls. Safety, fusion parameters, and biomechanics were assessed. RESULTS: No cell-related adverse events were observed. No significant differences were found between the five or 10 million MPC groups. Evaluation of fusion by CT scan at 3 months showed that 9 of 12 (75%) MPC-treated animals had continuous bony bridging compared with only 1 of 6 AG and 2 of 6 HA/TCP (P = 0.019 and P = 0.044, respectively). By quantitative CT, density of new bone in MPC-treated animals was 121% higher than in HA/TCP (P = 0.017) and 128% higher than in AG (P < 0.0001). Functional radiology at 3 months revealed that MPC-treated animals had significantly reduced macromotion at C3/4 compared with AG and HA/TCP groups combined (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Implantation of allogeneic MPCs when combined with HA/TCP and an interbody spacer facilitates new bone formation after discectomy without any cell-related complications. The earlier and dense new bone formation observed with MPCs relative to autograft and HA/TCP alone suggest that this approach may offer therapeutic benefit.
Authors: Emily M Lindley; Cameron Barton; Thomas Blount; Evalina L Burger; Christopher M J Cain; Howard B Seim; A Simon Turner; Vikas V Patel Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Hong-Jung Chen; Chien-Hsi Chen; Ming-Yao Chang; Da-Ching Tsai; Ellen Z Baum; Robert Hariri; Uri Herzberg; Patrick C H Hsieh Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 6.940
Authors: David Oehme; Tony Goldschlager; Jeffrey Rosenfeld; Andrew Danks; Peter Ghosh; Anne Gibbon; Graham Jenkin Journal: ScientificWorldJournal Date: 2012-09-17
Authors: Laura M Dooley; Anwar Abdalmula; Elizabeth A Washington; Claire Kaufman; Elizabeth M Tudor; Peter Ghosh; Silviu Itescu; Wayne G Kimpton; Simon R Bailey Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 3.240