Literature DB >> 25110482

Hinge Fracture during Cervical Open-door Laminoplasty: Does it Affect Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes?

Sung Hoon Cho1, Jung Hwan Lee1, Chung Kee Chough1, Won Il Joo1, Hae Kwan Park1, Kyung Jin Lee1, Hyoung Kyun Rha1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the status of the hinge gutter affected clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical open door laminoplasty.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients who had undergone cervical open door laminoplasty. 23 CT scans were performed at 2 days post-operation. The number of CT scans at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months were 16, 12, 21 and 11, respectively. We collected perioperative and follow-up data, including clinical and radiographic results.
RESULTS: There were 7 patients without a hinge fracture and 16 patients with one or more hinge fractures at 2 days postoperation. There were 90 hinges, and the rate of ideal greenstick deformation of the hinge was 63% on 2-day-postoperative CT scans. Postoperative VAS scores of neck pain (p=0.012) in patients without a hinge fracture were higher than in patients with hinge fractures. The hinge healing rates were 37% at 3 months, 57.4% at 6 months, 86.4% at 12 months, and 85.4% at 24 months. Among the patients, 14 patients had healed hinges, and 7 patients had one or more hinge(s) that was/were not healed at 12 months post-operation. However, in clinical and radiographic outcomes, there was no difference between these patients.
CONCLUSION: Cervical open door laminoplasty was safe and provided stable reconstruction of laminar expansion. In radiographs, the difference between hinges that had healed and hinges that had not healed was statistically negligible. Hinge fractures might not influence the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical open door laminoplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical vertebrae; Fracture; Laminoplasty; Treatment outcome

Year:  2014        PMID: 25110482      PMCID: PMC4124930          DOI: 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.2.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Spine        ISSN: 1738-2262


  11 in total

1.  Plate-only open door laminoplasty maintains stable spinal canal expansion with high rates of hinge union and no plate failures.

Authors:  John M Rhee; Bradley Register; Takahiko Hamasaki; Betty Franklin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Influence of hinge position on the effectiveness of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Yingpeng Xia; Yingyi Xia; Qingfeng Shen; Huinan Li; Tiantong Xu
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-12

3.  Hydroxyapatite laminar spacers and titanium miniplates in cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Takeo Goto; Kenji Ohata; Toshihiro Takami; Misao Nishikawa; Naohiro Tsuyuguchi; Michiharu Morino; Yasuhiro Matusaka; Akimasa Nishio; Yuichi Inoue; Mitsuhiro Hara
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  A Seichi; K Takeshita; I Ohishi; H Kawaguchi; T Akune; Y Anamizu; T Kitagawa; K Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; K Satomi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  K Satomi; Y Nishu; T Kohno; K Hirabayashi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Expansive laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic spacers: comparison with autogenous bone spacers.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Tanaka; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Yoshinori Fujimoto; Hirofumi Sasaki; Naosuke Kamei; Takahiko Hamasaki; Kiyotaka Yamada; Risako Yamamoto; Toshio Nakamae; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2008-12

8.  Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; J Miyakawa; K Satomi; T Maruyama; K Wakano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity.

Authors:  H Vernon; S Mior
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Postlaminoplasty cervical range of motion: early results.

Authors:  Suk-Hyung Kang; Seung-Chul Rhim; Sung-Woo Roh; Sang-Ryong Jeon; Hyun-Chul Baek
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Influence of fixed titanium plate position on the effectiveness of open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Fa-Jing Liu; Xiao-Kun Ding; Yi Chai; Su-Hong Qi; Peng-Fei Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.677

2.  Risk Factors for Hinge Fracture Associated with Surgery Following Cervical Open-Door Laminoplasty.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Lee; Chung Kee Chough
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-10-31

Review 3.  Surgical decision-making for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament versus other types of degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior versus posterior approaches.

Authors:  Suzanna Sum Sum Kwok; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.