Literature DB >> 27671282

Optimal area of lateral mass mini-screws implanted in plated cervical laminoplasty: a radiography anatomy study.

Hua Chen1, Huibo Li1, Yuxiao Deng1, Xin Rong1, Quan Gong1, Tao Li1, Yueming Song1, Hao Liu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lateral mass mini-screws used in plated cervical laminoplasty might penetrate into facet joints. The objective is to observe this complication incidence and to identify the optimal areas for 5- and 7-mm-long mini-screws to implant on lateral mass.
METHODS: 47 patients who underwent plated cervical laminoplasty were included. The optimal area for mini-screws implanting was set according to pre-operative 3D CT reconstruction data. Then, each posterior-lateral mass surface was divided into three regions: 7-mm region, 5-mm region, and dangerous area. The mini-screw implanted region was recorded. Post-operative CT images were used to identify whether the mini-screws penetrated into facet joints.
RESULTS: 235 mini-plates and 470 lateral mass mini-screws were used in the study. 117 (24.9%) mini-screws penetrated 88 (37.4%) facet joints. The 5-mm-long mini-screw optimal area occupied the upper 72, 65, 65, 64, and 65 % area of the posterior-lateral mass surface for C3-7, while the 7-mm-long mini-screw optimal area encompassed the upper 54, 39, 40, 33, and 32 %. Only 7-mm-long mini-screws were used to fix the plate to the lateral mass. 4 of 240 mini-screws in 7-mm region, 67 of the 179 mini-screws in 5-mm region, and 46 of the 51 mini-screws in dangerous region penetrated into the facet joint. The differences in the rate of facet joint penetration related to region were statistically significant (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The facet joint destruction by mini-screws was not a rare complication in plated cervical laminoplasty. The optimal areas we proposed may help guide the mini-screw implantation positions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D CT; Facet joint destruction; Lateral mass mini-screws; Optimal area; Plated cervical laminoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27671282     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4785-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  27 in total

Review 1.  Cervical laminoplasty: use of a novel titanium plate to maintain canal expansion--surgical technique.

Authors:  Andrew E Park; John G Heller
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-08

2.  Plate-only open door laminoplasty maintains stable spinal canal expansion with high rates of hinge union and no plate failures.

Authors:  John M Rhee; Bradley Register; Takahiko Hamasaki; Betty Franklin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Cervical pedicle screw insertion using a gutter entry point at the transitional area between the lateral mass and lamina.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Tofuku; Hiroaki Koga; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Unilateral laminoplasty with lateral mass screw fixation for less invasive decompression of the cervical spine: a biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  Gregor Schmeiser; C Schilling; T M Grupp; L Papavero; K Püschel; R Kothe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Expansive open-door laminoplasty with titanium miniplate versus sutures.

Authors:  Guangdong Chen; Zongping Luo; Badri Nalajala; Tao Liu; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 6.  Laminoplasty: a review of its role in compressive cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  James J Hale; Konrad I Gruson; Jeffrey M Spivak
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Morphometric subaxial lateral mass evaluation allows for preoperative optimal screw trajectory planning.

Authors:  K Hockel; G Maier; J Rathgeb; M Merkle; F Roser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Expansive open-door laminoplasty secured with titanium miniplates is a good surgical method for multiple-level cervical stenosis.

Authors:  Kuang-Ting Yeh; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Ing-Ho Chen; Cheng-Huan Peng; Kuan-Lin Liu; Ru-Ping Lee; Wen-Tien Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Reevaluation of the Pavlov ratio in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Kyung-Soo Suk; Ki-Tack Kim; Jung-Hee Lee; Sang-Hun Lee; Jin-Soo Kim; Jin-Young Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-02-06

Review 10.  Neck Pain Following Cervical Laminoplasty: Does Preservation of the C2 Muscle Attachments and/or C7 Matter?

Authors:  K Daniel Riew; Annie L Raich; Joseph R Dettori; John G Heller
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2013-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  [Effect of modified lateral mass screws implantation strategy on axial symptoms in cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty].

Authors:  Hua Chen; Hao Liu; Yuxiao Deng; Quan Gong; Beiyu Wang; Chen Ding
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-04-15

2.  Anatomical considerations for appropriate mini-plate positioning in open-door laminoplasty to avoid plate impingement and screw facet violation.

Authors:  Jae Jun Yang; Sehan Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  In vitro biomechanical evaluation of a monocoque plate-spacer construct for cervical open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Yukoh Ohara; Takeshi Hara; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Satoshi Tani; Nozomu Inoue; Junichi Mizuno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.