Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans secretome containing a newly described lipoprotein Licanantase enhances chalcopyrite bioleaching rate.

The nature of the mineral-bacteria interphase where electron and mass transfer processes occur is a key element of the bioleaching processes of sulfide minerals. This interphase is composed of proteins, metabolites, and other compounds embedded in extracellular polymeric substances mainly consisting of sugars and lipids (Gehrke et al., Appl Environ Microbiol 64(7):2743-2747, 1998). On this respect, despite Acidithiobacilli-a ubiquitous bacterial genera in bioleaching processes (Rawlings, Microb Cell Fact 4(1):13, 2005)-has long been recognized as secreting bacteria (Jones and Starkey, J Bacteriol 82:788-789, 1961; Schaeffer and Umbreit, J Bacteriol 85:492-493, 1963), few studies have been carried out in order to clarify the nature and the role of the secreted protein component: the secretome. This work characterizes for the first time the sulfur (meta)secretome of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans strain DSM 17318 in pure and mixed cultures with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans DSM 16786, identifying the major component of these secreted fractions as a single lipoprotein named here as Licanantase. Bioleaching assays with the addition of Licanantase-enriched concentrated secretome fractions show that this newly found lipoprotein as an active protein additive exerts an increasing effect on chalcopyrite bioleaching rate.

Introduction

The use of microorganisms for metal recovery from ores constitutes an industrial process of major interest. In this context, bacterial leaching with the corresponding release of metal ions from insoluble metal sulfides such as copper bioleaching from the refractory chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) through biooxidative processes represents an area of active research.

Due to the extreme environmental conditions in bioleaching processes, the predominant bacterial species are extremophiles (particularly acidophilic) able to oxidize iron and sulfur, where proteobacteria belonging to the genera Acidithiobacillus, Acidiphilium, and Leptospirillum are present. Particular attention has been given to the species Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans since it is the most studied bacterial species among the microorganisms found in industrial bioleaching heaps and dumps together with Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans (Rawlings 2005).

Concerning the role of bacteria in the bioleaching process, contact and non-contact mechanisms have been proposed (Rohwerder et al. 2003). The non-contact mechanism involves planktonic bacteria recycling strong oxidants such as ferric ions. On the other hand, the contact mechanism considers that most cells attach to the sulfide mineral surface forming specialized biofilms and that the bioleaching process occurs at the mineral–bacteria interphase. In such case, A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans may act directly catalyzing a straight electron transfer from the metal sulfide to the formation of biomass, or indirectly by means of their ability to oxidize, for example, inorganic sulfur compounds such as elemental sulfur using oxygen as electron acceptor, assisting the solubilization of metal sulfides present in the mineral surface through the elimination of passivation layers that act as diffusion barriers for the oxidative process (Rohwerder et al. 2003). The contact mechanism involves the formation of biofilms where extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) play an essential role in bioleaching bacterial attachment to the mineral surface together with a series of substances that are produced including acid excretion, slime formation, and surfactant and protein secretion among other bacterial products (Sand and Gehrke 2006).

An important role of bioleaching bacteria is to generate an appropriate micro-environment at the mineral–bacteria interphase that allows the occurrence of electron and mass transfer phenomena involved in the bioleaching processes. From this perspective, the production of secreted substances and particularly of EPS has been directly linked to the electrochemical nature of mineral degradation by surface potential measurements, indicating the importance of EPS for metal sulfide dissolution (Gehrke et al. 1998). Moreover, for many years, it has been recognized that Acidithiobacilli and particularly A. thiooxidans are able to secrete organic compounds, some initially identified as amino acids and polypeptides (Jones and Starkey 1961) and others as metabolites such as phosphotidylinositol which apparently enhances elemental sulfur oxidation acting as a wetting agent (Schaeffer and Umbreit 1963). However, neither the characterization of the secreted protein fraction nor the determination of its potential role as bioleaching enhancers has been reported. Recently, the fraction of extracellular proteins of A. ferrooxidans grown in sulfur and ferrous sulfate was characterized by standard proteomic techniques (2D SDS-PAGE and MALDI-ToF/ToF), indicating the presence of a complex mixture of extracellular proteins in sulfur-grown cultures potentially associated to sulfur solubilization (Zhang et al. 2008) and therefore possibly related to the bioleaching processes of sulfide minerals.

In this study, based on recent proteomic studies performed at BioSigma S.A. of the secreted protein fraction (secretome) of A. thiooxidans DSM 17318 pure cultures and mixtures with A. ferrooxidans DSM 16786 grown in elemental sulfur, we report here the identification of the major secreted protein component being a lipoprotein named here as Licanantase that is able to increase the bioleaching rate of chalcopyrite.

Materials and methods

Strains and culture conditions

A. ferrooxidans DSM 16786 and A. thiooxidans DSM 17318 (all strains patented by BioSigma S.A. in their use for bioleaching purposes, patent registration no. CL 44546 and patent application no. CL 2101-2005) were pre-grown at 30°C with shaking (200 rpm) in basal 9K medium (990 mg/L (NH4)2SO4, 145 mg/L NaH2PO4·H2O, 52 mg/L KH2PO4, 100 mg/L MgSO4·7H2O, and 21 mg/L CaCl2), adjusted to pH 1.6 and supplemented with sulfur 1% w/v. Bacteria were inoculated at 1% v/v with the same conditions as the grown pre-cultures and harvested at the late exponential phase (7–8 days).

Bacterial enumeration

Cell number was determined by chamber counting using a microscope (Thoma Chamber, depth 0.010 mm). Strain proportion was determined by specific Q-PCR determination of purified genomic DNA extracted by the phenol/chloroform/isopropyl alcohol method with primers directed against a conserved 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene region for total bacteria (forward 5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′, reverse 5′-CCGTCAATTCCTTTGAGTTT-3′), rusticyanin gene rusB for A. ferrooxidans DSM 16786 (forward 5′-GGACACCACCTGGAAAAC-3′, reverse 5′-TCCCTTGTTGGTGTTGATG-3′), and 16S rDNA gene for A. thiooxidans DSM 17318 (forward 5′-TAATATCGCCTGCTGTTGAC-3′, reverse 5′-TTTCACGACAGACCTAATG-3′), all patented by Biosigma S.A. for their commercial use for the identification and quantification of biomining microorganisms (patent registration no. CL 46739 and patent application no. CL 0660-2007).

Concentration of secreted complex protein mixtures (secretome) and subfraction enriched in Licanantase

One to 5 L of late exponential culture was centrifuged twice at 5,000×g for 15 min at 4°C in order to separate solids. The culture supernatant was filtered with 0.2-μm nitrocellulose-disposable filters to remove any remaining solid and/or cell debris, followed by ultrafiltration in a membrane of 3 kDa (Amicon® Ultra-15, 3 MWCO, Millipore) by centrifugation steps at 6,000×g for 30 min at 4°C, reducing the volume down to 0.2–1 L (5× concentration) for bioleaching assays or to 1–5 mL (1,000× concentration) for proteomic analysis. In order to obtain different secretome subfractions, the filtrate was passed through an ultrafiltration membrane of 30 kDa (Amicon® Ultra-15, 30 MWCO, Millipore), obtaining a retained subfraction of >30 kDa impoverished on Licanantase and an ultrafiltrated subfraction of <30 kDa enriched in Licanantase.

2-Keto-3-deoxyoctonate assay

Determination of the integrity of the outer membrane during the concentration of the secretome was performed by determination of lypopolysaccharide conducted by assay for 2-keto-3-deoxyoctonate (KDO) as previously described (Lee and Tsai 1999).

First dimension: isoelectrofocusing

Analytical determinations were carried out with 50 μg of protein mixture determined by Bradford (Bio-Rad protein assay, Bio-Rad), diluted up to 125 μL with protein resuspension buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% w/v CHAPS, 20 mM Trizma base), in the presence of ampholytes and under reducing conditions on ReadyStrip IPG strips, 7 cm, pH 3–10 (Bio-Rad). Passive rehydration was carried out for 2 h at 20°C on a focusing tray. Samples were covered with silicon oil to avoid dehydration. Active rehydration was performed at 50 V for 12 h. Isoelectric focusing was done at a final voltage of 10,000 V on Protean® IEF cell (Bio-Rad) until reaching 10 kVh. Focused samples were stored at –80°C until the second dimension step. Isoelectrofocusing was done at least in duplicate for each sample.

Second dimension: SDS-PAGE

Focused ReadyStrip IPG strips were equilibrated first in equilibration buffer containing 6 M urea, 0.375 M Trizma base, pH 8.6, 30% v/v glycerin, 2% w/v SDS, and 2% w/v dithiothreitol (DTT) and later in the same buffer replacing DTT with 2.5% w/v iodoacetamide. After equilibration, second dimension separation was performed on 15% SDS-polyacrylamide 13 × 9-cm gels with the focused sample embedded in 0.5% IEF agarose in a CriterionTM Cell (Bio-Rad) at 150 V for 1.5 h. The gels were directly stained with ProteoBlue Safe (Coomassie™ Brilliant Blue G-250, National Diagnostics) overnight and finally de-stained with distilled water. Images of the 2-DE gels were scanned and processed using Z3 v3.0.7 image analysis software (Compugen) for protein differential expression analysis. SDS-PAGE was done at least in duplicate for each sample.

Protein identification

Protein spots from 2D SDS-PAGE were manually cut and processed using In-Gel tryptic digestion kit (Pierce). Tryptic peptides were sent to the Yale Center for Functional Proteomics and Genomics (University of Yale) for LC/MS and MS/MS analysis with an Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). The generated data were analyzed with Xcalibur software (Thermo Scientific) producing a peptide mass list and identified with SEQUEST and X!tandem search engines against the NCBInr database. Protein identification reported here comes from at least two independent LC–MS/MS analyses.

Bioleaching assays

Bioleaching assays were done in shake flasks at least in duplicate. Each flask contained 100 mL of minimal 9K media (pH 1.6) as described above and supplemented with 1.5 g/L of Fe(III) and 2.5 g/L of Fe(II) with 1% w/v chalcopyrite concentrate (85.5% chalcopyrite representing more than 99% of total Cu in the assay). Culture media was inoculated with A. thiooxidans and A. ferrooxidans equally (1.00E+007 cell/mL each) and (meta)secretome was added at a final total protein concentration of 10 mg/L. A non-inoculated control, a control inoculated but without secretome addition, and an inoculated heat-inactivated secretome with the total secreted protein fraction of A. thiooxidans denatured by boiling it for 5 min at 95°C were included. Shake flasks were incubated for 21 days at 30°C with agitation, and weekly measurements of cell counts (as described above), Fe(II) by the o-phenantroline method (Kolthoff and Sandell 1963), and total iron and Cu(II) by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAnalyst 400, Perkin Elmer) were performed.

Results

Culture harvesting at the late exponential phase showed similar total number of cells between pure and mixed cultures and a major proportion of A. thiooxidans in the mixed culture as shown in Table 1. This result indicates that A. thiooxidans has better fitness under the culture conditions used since it overcomes A. ferrooxidans growth by three orders of magnitude. Similar results have been reported previously in natural populations of sulfur-oxidizing acidophilic bacteria (Knickerbocker et al. 2000), indicating that A. thiooxidans has a competitive advantage over A. ferrooxidans under current culture conditions.

Table 1

Species composition at late exponential phase of pure and mixed cultures used in this study

Culture	Q-PCR determinations
	Total bacteria/mL	A. ferrooxidans/mL	A. thiooxidans/mL
A. thiooxidans	2.30 × 108	n.d.	6.67 × 108
A. ferrooxidans	2.70 × 108	2.56 × 108	n.d.
A. thiooxidans + A. ferrooxidans	4.31 × 108	1.83 × 105	5.46 × 108

n.d. not detected

The amount of total protein secreted in both cultures was determined in the range of 2 mg/L for cultures with A. thiooxidans. This can be considered a low amount compared to previous reports on Bacillus sp. (200 mg/L) (Chu et al. 2000) but closer to the reported protein secretion of the biomining microorganism Paenibacillus polymyxa (20 mg/L) (Patra and Natarajan 2006). No protein secretion was detected in the pure culture of A. ferrooxidans using the protocols described here, indicating that no cell lysis or protein leakage could be associated to the observed proteins due to the treatment used. Moreover, KDO assay showed outer membrane integrity during secretome concentration (data not shown). This result is in contrast to the one published by Zhang et al. (2008) where a complex mixture is reported. However, it is important to highlight that the procedures for extracellular protein isolation differ significantly since these authors partially purify the washing solution coming out of an acid incubation at 60°C of the cell pellet obtained after centrifugation, while our protocol is restricted only to the sterile-filtered supernatant.

The characterization of the sulfur secretome of A. thiooxidans DSM 17318 on 2D SDS-PAGE showed protein spots in a wide spectrum of molecular weight and pI, with a high concentration of protein in the low molecular weight and basic range as observed in Fig. 1 (lower right section), indicating that a large amount of the secreted protein is charged under current acidic culture conditions.

Fig. 1

Bidimensional SDS-PAGE of the sulfur batch culture secretome of A. thiooxidans. Identified proteins are highlighted with arrows and numerated according to: 1 Licanantase lipoprotein; 3 hypothetical protein Lferr_1276; 4 glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; 5 protein TolA; 6 pentapeptide repeat-containing protein, IcmE; 7 hypothetical protein Lferr_1859; 8 3-isopropylmalate dehydratase, large subunit; 9, 10 phosphate-selective porin O and P

Characterization of A. thiooxidans DSM 17318 sulfur secretome

Analysis by LC–MS/MS of the secreted proteins allowed the identification of ten protein spots with statistical significance (Table 2). First, the sulfur secretome of pure A. thiooxidans showed the presence of a predominant protein (Fig. 1, protein spot 1) identified as a putative lipoprotein. Reverse genetics done over A. thiooxidans DSM 17318 draft genome sequence starting with ab initio sequenced peptides led us to the nucleotide sequence of the gene codifying for a protein with 96% amino acidic sequence identity to A. ferrooxidans ATCC 53993 putative lipoprotein (NCBInr access no. YP_002220838.1|), a new protein called here as Licanantase. Estimation based on a combination of the area and contrast of each protein spot automatically detected on 2D SDS-PAGE renders that over 32% of the total protein secreted by A. thiooxidans DSM 17318 corresponds to Licanantase.

Table 2

Ab initio LC–MS/MS identification of selected proteins present in the secretome of pure A. thiooxidans and the metasecretome of mixed A. thiooxidans/A. ferrooxidans sulfur cultures

Spot no.	Protein ID (NCBInr protein BLAST)	pI	MW [kDa]	Peptides	ID prob. (%)	Comments/observations
A. thiooxidans DSM 17318 secretome protein identification
1	YP_002220838.1| lipoprotein, putative [Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 53993]	9.4	10.2	(K)AEEANEKVER(M)	100	Lipoprotein named Licanantase in this study
				(K)ANAAQSTATDALSK(A)		(SignalP 3.0 Server) SignalP Prediction: signal peptide probability—0.996
				(K)ANAAQSTADQAmSTANSANQK(A)
						Signal anchor probability—0.001.
3	YP_002219721.1| hypothetical protein Lferr_1276 [Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 53993]	9.1	33.4	(R)TAQEYR(S)	100	Non-classically secreted protein (Secretome 2.0 Server)
				(R)EDNDPRAKDR(E)
4	YP_002514952.1| glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (phosphorylating) [Thioalkalivibrio sp. HL-EbGR7]	6.2	35.7	(K)TVDGPSAKDWR(G)	100	(TatP 1.0 Server) potential Tat signal peptide
						Most likely cleavage site between pos. 22 and 23: AIA-KE
				(K)YAGEKIVSAASCTTNCLAPIAK(V)
						Non-classically secreted protein (Secretome 2.0 Server)
5	YP_002218536.1| protein TolA [Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 53993]	10.1	32.9	(K)QLAAQAAQAAAAAR(A)	100	Non-classically secreted protein (Secretome 2.0 Server)
				(K)AAQEKATARKAAQEK(A)
6	YP_002302972.1| pentapeptide repeat-containing protein, IcmE [Coxiella burnetii CbuG_Q212]	9.2	106.4	(R)FDTPPTVR(V)	100	A. thiooxidans DSM 17318 draft genome showed a truncated icmE gene that, based on proteomic analysis, is able to generate a protein of 45.7 kDa
						(TatP 1.0 Server) potential Tat signal peptide
						Most likely cleavage site between pos. 40 and 41: AGL-QS
						Non-classically secreted protein (Secretome 2.0 Server)
7	YP_002220287.1| hypothetical protein Lferr_1859 [Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 53993]	4.5	25.5	(K)EQVSLTLMRTLALEGIKLR(E)	100	No signal peptide
				(R)SEPTFGEK(S)
				(R)MRQGLMQFTSSR(S)		Anomalous protein molecular mass
				(K)PAPINPEPAEKPIR(F)
8	YP_002219232.1| 3-isopropylmalate dehydratase, large subunit [Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 53993]	5.7	50.1	(K)AQAEAEGLDR(I)	100	No signal peptide
				(K)DMVLAIIGK(M)
				(K)AASVKVAMVVPGSGLVK(A)
9	YP_002220770.1| phosphate-selective porin O and P [Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 53993]	4.9	42.2	(K)WDGAYTSK(G)	100	Omp40-like protein
				(K)FRVPVGMER(T)
				(R)SMNQTLGADR(S)		Non-classically secreted protein (Secretome 2.0 Server)
				(R)QVDSWNVGAR(G)
				(K)YLFAGMVGYK(L)
				(K)GTAVPGVTYNFQYK(W)		42.3% amino acid identity to Omp40 (YP_002427116) from A. ferrooxidans ATCC 23270
				(R)TQFSGNDLWFIQR(S)
				(R)VQLNYVIPTGASGFR(H)
				(R)TQFSGNDLWFIQR(S)
				(K)GTAVPGVTYNFQYK(W)
				(K)GIGSHTGNSGIQDAEINFAFIPEVQLK(V)
10	YP_002220770.1| phosphate-selective porin O and P [Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 53993]	4.9	42.2	(K)WDGAYTSK(G)	96	Omp40-like protein
				(K)GTAVPGVTYNFQYK(W)
				(R)TQFSGNDLWFIQR(S)		Non-classically secreted protein (Secretome 2.0 Server)
				(R)VQLNYVIPTGASGFR(H)
						42.3% amino acid identity to Omp40 (YP_002427116) from A. ferrooxidans ATCC 23270
				(K)YLFAGmVGYK(L)
A. thiooxidans DSM 17318/A. ferroxidans DSM 16786 metasecretome protein identification
2	YP_002220838.1| lipoprotein, putative [Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 53993]	9.4	10.2	(K)ANAAQSTATDALSK(A)	100	Lipoprotein named Licanantase in this study
						(SignalP 3.0 Server) SignalP Prediction: signal peptide probability—0.996
						Signal anchor probability—0.001
11	YP_002220838.1| lipoprotein, putative [Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 53993]	9.4	10.2	(K)ANAAQSTATDALSK(A)	100	Lipoprotein named Licanantase in this study
						(SignalP 3.0 Server) SignalP Prediction: signal peptide probability—0.996
						Signal anchor probability—0.001
12	YP_002220838.1| lipoprotein, putative [Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 53993]	9.4	10.2	(K)ANAAQSTATDALSK(A)	100	Lipoprotein named Licanantase in this study
						(SignalP 3.0 Server) SignalP Prediction: signal peptide probability—0.996
						Signal anchor probability—0.001
13	YP_002220770.1| phosphate-selective porin O and P [Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 53993]	4.9	42.2	(K)WDGAYTSK(G)	55	Omp40-like protein
						Non-classically secreted protein (Secretome 2.0 Server)
						42.3% amino acid identity to Omp40 (YP_002427116) from A. ferrooxidans ATCC 23270
14	YP_608509.1| hypothetical protein PSEEN2944 [Pseudomonas entomophila L48]	4.8	46.2	(R)LSLSTSFADR(I)	100	(SignalP 3.0 Server) SignalP Prediction: signal peptide probability—0.998
						Signal anchor probability—0.001
15	YP_002219159.1| cytochrome c biogenesis protein transmembrane region [Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 53993]	9.3	65.0	(R)VNVTASDAASR(H)	100	(SignalP 3.0 Server) SignalP Prediction: signal peptide probability—0.971
				(R)mDVETYDNPR(V)		Signal anchor probability—0.027

The remaining secreted proteins were selected based on protein abundance and their identifications are listed on Table 2. In general, most proteins showed a signal peptide supporting the possibility of being secreted. However, several identifications gave no signal peptides on their amino acid sequence. A particularly interesting case was the protein spot 9 (Fig. 1) identified as a porin protein with 42.3% amino acid identity to Omp40 from A. ferrooxidans ATCC 23270. The Omp40 protein has been identified previously in A. ferrooxidans as the major outer membrane protein and associated to phosphate limiting and pH variation response (Seeger and Jerez 1993; Amaro et al. 1991) and specifically related to bacterial adherence to the hydrophobic surface of sulfur particles as previously reported (Arredondo et al. 1994). Moreover, Omp40 has been recently associated to a new iron-oxidizing supercomplex from A. ferrooxidans, being proposed to perform an important function in the bacterial interaction with the substrate, particularly associated to electron transfer pathways (Castelle et al. 2008). However, topology prediction of transmembrane secondary structures in proteins (TMHMM Server v2.0 at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) based on the amino acid sequence coming from the corresponding coding gene from A. thiooxidans DSM 17318 (data not shown) showed no transmembrane helices as described for Omp40 from A. ferrooxidans (Guiliani and Jerez 2000), supporting the hypothesis of secretion of this “Omp40-like” protein. Moreover, analysis with the bioinformatics tool to predict non-classical protein secretion (Secretome Server v2.0 at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SecretomeP/) gave a score of 0.88 exceeding the normal threshold of 0.5 and consequently indicating a high probability of being a non-classically secreted protein (Bendtsen et al. 2005). The remaining proteins identified included TolA, a periplasmic protein that couples inner and outer membrane transport complexes, and unexpectedly, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and 3-isopropylmalate dehydratase large subunit, related to carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism, respectively. Finally, two hypothetical and a pentapeptide repeat-containing protein IcmE uncharacterized proteins with no conserved domains and therefore no possible function assignment were found to be present in the secretome of A. thiooxidans.

Presence of Licanantase in the sulfur metasecretome of A. thiooxidans/A. ferrooxidans mixed culture

Following the analysis of secreted proteins, a sulfur mixed culture of A. thiooxidans DSM 17318 and A. ferrooxidans DSM 16786 was grown and harvested at the late exponential phase. It was found that A. thiooxidans predominates by three orders of magnitude in the mixed culture, and the secreted protein pattern was similar to the one observed in the pure culture of this sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, with a major protein spot located on the low molecular weight range and basic pI zone. However, some differences were observed. The metasecretome of the mixture showed up-regulation of high molecular weight protein spots and, interestingly, de novo synthesis of several protein spots as shown in Fig. 2. Identification of protein spot 2 (Fig. 2) gave Licanantase with a 100% detection probability. Licanantase accounted for more than 19% of the total protein of the metasecretome, not considering two extra protein spots identified as Licanantase that presented a particular isoelectric point in the bidimensional SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2, spots 11 and 12), indicating the presence of different Licanantase isoforms in the metasecretome possibly due to posttranslational modifications. Also, it cannot be discarded that A. ferrooxidans DSM 16786 secretes a similar lipoprotein since the genome of strain ATCC 53993 possesses a codifying sequence for a protein with 96% amino acidic sequence identity. Furthermore, the presence of a putative lipoprotein of the same molecular weight (10.2 kDa) among the extracellular proteins of A. ferrooxidans ATCC 23270 grown in sulfur (Zhang et al. 2008) has been reported.

Fig. 2

Bidimensional SDS-PAGE of the sulfur batch culture metasecretome of A. thiooxidans/A. ferrooxidans mixed culture. Identified proteins are highlighted with arrows and numerated according to: 2, 11, and 12 Licanantase lipoprotein; 13 phosphate-selective porin O and P; 14 hypothetical protein PSEEN2944; 15 cytochrome c biogenesis protein transmembrane region

Further identification of selected highly expressed proteins of the metasecretome ratified the presence of the Omp40-like protein observed in the pure culture and an uncharacterized protein identified on public databases as the hypothetical protein PSEEN2944 from Pseudomonas entomophila L48 that presented 14% amino acidic identity with the hypothetical protein Lferr_0772 from A. ferrooxidans ATCC 53993 (YP_002219229.1|) with no function or conserved domain assigned, but with a predicted signal sequence suggesting that it is a secreted protein. Finally, an eightfold up-regulation of a cytochrome c biogenesis protein was found. This protein assists cytochrome c maturation (Mavridou et al. 2009) and also is reported to facilitate the disulfide bond formation in the folding pathway of many periplasmic and outer membrane proteins by means of electron transport from the cytoplasmic thioredoxin across the inner membrane to specific periplasmic proteins (Rozhkova and Glockshuber 2008). Interestingly, the protein identification matched against A. thiooxidans and A. ferrooxidans coding sequences (89% amino acid identity among sequences), so it is possible that a combination and/or an enhanced protein synthesis is obtained by bacterial interaction in the mixed culture (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Amino acid sequence alignment of the putative lipoprotein from A. ferrooxidans ATCC 53993 (YP_002220838.1|) and the lipoprotein Licanantase from A. thiooxidans DSM 17318. Amino acid sequence identity of 96%

Effect of Licanantase on chalcopyrite bioleaching rate

In order to establish the potential role of the (meta)secretome under bioleaching process conditions, several bioleaching assays were carried out with five times (5×) concentrated secreted proteins as additives. As shown on Fig. 4 (left panel), both the sulfur secretome of A. thiooxidans and the sulfur metasecretome of A. thiooxidans plus A. ferrooxidans enhance significantly the copper recovery compared to the controls (between 6% and 9% more copper in solution than the controls inoculated without additive and non-inoculated with additive, respectively), pointing out that the (meta)secretome enhances the bioleaching rate of chalcopyrite in a bacterial-mediated manner. The effect was observed from the beginning of the experience and was similar for both the pure and mixed sulfur culture total secreted proteins, and interestingly, it was not related to growth enhancement as shown in Fig. 4 (right panel).

Fig. 4

Chalcopyrite bioleaching assays. Black triangle, 5× total sulfur secretome of A. thiooxidans; empty circle, 5× total sulfur metasecretome of A. thiooxidans/A. ferrooxidans; empty square, control with no addition of secretome; black diamond, control without inoculum. Left, percent Cu recovery; right, bacterial growth determinations

Based on the common protein features observed and identified in A. thiooxidans secretome and the mixed culture metasecretome summarized in Table 2, it can be said that only the proteins identified as Licanantase and Omp40-like were shared and attributable here as common protein elements to exert the observed chalcopyrite bioleaching rate enhancing effect. Therefore to distinguish between these two proteins, a subfractionation of the sulfur secretome of A. thiooxidans using a 30-kDa cut-off value was performed by ultrafiltration in order to obtain two enriched subfractions (>30 kDa enriched in Omp40-like protein and <30 kDa enriched in Licananatse). Clearly both subfractions contained protein mixtures, but this was particularly true in the case of the higher molecular weight fraction since several protein identifications were above the cut-off molecular weight value. Surprisingly, only the subfraction enriched in Licanantase showed a comparable chalcopyrite bioleaching rate enhancing effect compared to the one observed for the total secretome bioleaching under the same assay conditions (Fig. 5, left panel). The sulfur secretome molecular weight fraction higher than 30 kDa as well as the control with heat-inactivated total secretome of A. thiooxidans (boiled for 5 min at 95°C) showed no effect over the inoculated control without protein additive. Once more, no variations on bacterial counts discard any effect on growth enhancement.

Fig. 5

Chalcopyrite bioleaching assays. Filled triangle, 5× >30 kDa subfraction of the total sulfur secretome of A. thiooxidans; empty circle, 5× <30 kDa subfraction of the total sulfur secretome of A. thiooxidans; empty diamond, control with the addition of A. thiooxidans heat-inactivated total secretome; empty square, control with no addition of secretome subfractions; filled diamond, control without inoculum. Left, percent Cu recovery; right, bacterial growth determinations

Discussion

The present study reports for the first time the characteristics of the elemental sulfur secretome of the bioleaching bacterium A. thiooxidans, which shows the presence of protein-mediated processes in bioleaching bacteria and identifies the major secreted fraction as a lipoprotein named here as Licanantase. Moreover, the variations in the protein patterns from pure A. thiooxidans as well as those from mixed A. thiooxidans plus A. ferrooxidans cultures grown in sulfur where A. thiooxidans is the dominant species show a variation in the protein secretion probably due to the interaction between strains. Protein identification relates the secretion of proteins linked to adhesion and electron transport, which are key aspects in bacterial colonization and oxidation of insoluble substrates. A major question arises from the nature of the proteins identified on the mechanisms of protein secretion. As mentioned in the “Introduction”, A. thiooxidans has long been recognized as a secreting strain (Jones and Starkey 1961; Schaeffer and Umbreit 1963), and an outer membrane vesicle “blebbing” has been demonstrated under elemental sulfur growth (Knickerbocker et al. 2000). Outer membrane vesicles are constitutively secreted in Gram-negative bacteria acting as mediators of bacterial endurance (Lee et al. 2008) and are a plausible mechanism of outer membrane and periplasmic protein secretion.

The mechanism by which the observed fivefold enhancement of Licanantase and other (meta)secreted proteins on the bioleaching rate of chalcopyrite is not yet understood and will be continuously the focus of our research group. The newly described lipoprotein Licanantase is the major protein component of the active protein additive that exerts this effect on bioleaching. Certainly, further Licanantase purification and characterization is required in order to establish its role in bioleaching, a task that is currently being developed at our laboratory.

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(XLS 62 kb)

(XLS 186 kb)