| Literature DB >> 26278538 |
Patricio Martinez1, Mario Vera2, Roberto A Bobadilla-Fazzini3.
Abstract
Bioleaching corresponds to the microbial-catalyzed process of conversion of insoluble metals into soluble forms. As an applied biotechnology globally used, it represents an extremely interesting field of research where omics techniques can be applied in terms of knowledge development, but moreover in terms of process design, control, and optimization. In this mini-review, the current state of genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics of bioleaching and the major impacts of these analytical methods at industrial scale are highlighted. In summary, genomics has been essential in the determination of the biodiversity of leaching processes and for development of conceptual and functional metabolic models. Proteomic impacts are mostly related to microbe-mineral interaction analysis, including copper resistance and biofilm formation. Early steps of metabolomics in the field of bioleaching have shown a significant potential for the use of metabolites as industrial biomarkers. Development directions are given in order to enhance the future impacts of the omics in biohydrometallurgy.Entities:
Keywords: Bioleaching; Genomics; Metabolomics; Proteomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26278538 PMCID: PMC4768214 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-6903-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ISSN: 0175-7598 Impact factor: 4.813
List of publicly available genomes of microorganisms involved in bioleaching according to the NCBI database
| Organism/name | Kingdom | Group | Subgroup | Size (Mb) | Chr | Plasmids | GC (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1.56491 | 1 | 1 | 46.0 | Urbieta et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 1.5848 | 1 | – | 39.9 | You et al. ( |
|
|
|
|
| 2.99225 | 1 | 3 | 35.8 | Mardanov et al. (2010) |
|
|
|
|
| 1.5459 | 1 | – | 36.0 | Lucas et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.22596 | 1 | – | 36.7 | Liu et al. (2011) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.69476 | 1 | – | 32.8 | Auernik et al. ( |
|
|
|
|
| 1.93521 | 1 | – | 36.5 | Lucas et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.19152 | 1 | – | 46.2 | Chen et al. (2005) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.73627 | 1 | 12 | 35.1 | Mao et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.60883 | 1 | 12 | 35.1 | Mao et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.6924 | 1 | 12 | 35.0 | Mao et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.58665 | 1 | 12 | 35.0 | Guo et al. ( |
|
|
|
|
| 2.70206 | 1 | 12 | 35.4 | Reno et al. (2009) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.85441 | 1 | 12 | 35.3 | Jaubert et al. (2013) |
|
|
|
|
| 1.49645 | 1 | – | 54.2 | Reno et al. (2009) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.13765 | 1 | 1 | 34.1 | Cadillo-Quiroz et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 1.84035 | 1 | – | 42.0 | Cadillo-Quiroz et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.52299 | 1 | 12 | 35.3 | Reno et al. (2009) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.6552 | 1 | 12 | 35.1 | Reno et al. (2009) |
|
|
|
|
| 1.54685 | 1 | – | 30.0 | Cadillo-Quiroz et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.81745 | – | – | 47.7 | Cadillo-Quiroz et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.22596 | 1 | – | 36.7 | Cadillo-Quiroz et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.22596 | 1 | – | 36.7 | Guo et al. ( |
|
|
|
|
| 2.64525 | 1 | 12 | 35.0 | Reno et al. (2009) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.60113 | 1 | 12 | 35.1 | Reno et al. (2009) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.66478 | 1 | 12 | 35.0 | Lucas et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.58984 | 1 | 12 | 35.0 | McCarthy et al. (2015) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.63756 | 1 | 12 | 35.1 | She et al. (2001) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.66897 | 1 | 3 | 35.8 | McCarthy et al. (2015) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.22596 | 1 | – | 36.3 | McCarthy et al. (2015) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.46518 | 1 | 12 | 35.1 | Kawarabayasi et al. (2001) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.45402 | – | – | 35.6 | Bulaev (2015) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.72726 | 1 | 3 | 35.9 | Allen et al. ( |
|
|
|
|
| 2.72731 | 1 | 3 | 35.9 | Fütterer et al. ( |
|
|
|
|
| 2.72734 | 1 | 3 | 35.9 | Ruepp et al. (2000) |
|
|
|
|
| 1.74736 | – | – | 34.0 | Kawashima et al. (2000) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.96308 | 1 | 8 | 67.1 | Clum et al. (2009) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.94328 | – | – | 61.7 | Poehlein et al. (2015) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.84675 | 1 | – | 41.8 | Kyrpides et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.9824 | 1 | 2 | 58.8 | Lucas et al. (2008) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.88504 | – | – | 58.9 | Mavromatis et al. (2010) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.15816 | 1 | – | 68.3 | Chen et al. (2011) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.98705 | 1 | 4 | 61.4 | Shemesh et al. (2013) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.20569 | 1 | 3 | 61.9 | Kyrpides et al. (2013) |
|
|
|
|
| 4.21474 | – | – | 67.0 | Kyrpides et al. (2013) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.17493 | – | – | 58.6 | Wang et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.12405 | – | – | 61.5 | King et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.55121 | 1 | – | 56.8 | Kyrpides et al. (2013) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.40616 | 1 | – | 54.6 | Belduz et al. (2015) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.2376 | 1 | 4 | 60.9 | Rozanov et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.20755 | – | – | 56.6 | Rajan et al. (2013) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.01987 | – | – | 53.2 | Matsutani et al. (2013) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.96716 | – | – | 53.8 | Wang et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.59664 | – | – | 41.4 | Caspers et al. (2013) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.67159 | – | – | 41.9 | Saw et al. (2008) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.85866 | – | – | 41.4 | Belduz et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.55783 | 1 | – | 56.8 | Lee et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.86201 | 1 | – | 49.3 | Filippidou et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.55954 | – | – | 50.0 | Patel (2015) |
|
|
|
|
| 4.06355 | – | – | 52.2 | Goh et al. ( |
|
|
|
|
| 3.27232 | – | – | 58.2 | Bryanskaya et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.31051 | – | – | 57.2 | Kahar et al. (2013) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.39856 | – | – | 53.7 | King et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.65842 | – | – | 41.8 | Poli et al. (2015) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.63066 | – | – | 42.7 | Anderson et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.77262 | – | – | 41.7 | Li et al. (2011) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.33355 | 1 | – | 48.3 | Guo et al. (2013) |
|
|
|
|
| 1.52216 | – | – | 59.0 | Travisany et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.08865 | – | – | 55.3 | Cárdenas et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 4.09165 | – | – | 62.3 | Mi et al. (2011) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.8835 | – | – | 41.7 | Guo et al. ( |
|
|
|
|
| 2.8087 | – | – | 41.7 | Fujimura et al. (2012) |
|
|
|
|
| 6.97598 | – | – | 46.8 | Goltsman et al. (2013) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.83235 | – | – | 41.8 | Liu and Yang (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.83839 | – | – | 41.4 | Kyrpides et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.83868 | – | – | 42.3 | Copeland et al. (2007) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.75833 | – | – | 41.4 | Hosoyama et al. (2010) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.364 | – | – | 43.0 | Poehlein et al. 2014 |
|
|
|
|
| 2.73691 | – | – | 42.0 | San Martin-Uriz et al. (2011) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.33059 | – | – | 54.5 | Moya-Beltrán et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.40588 | – | – | 54.1 | Valdes et al. (2009) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.98963 | – | – | 68.5 | You et al. ( |
|
|
|
|
| 3.92946 | – | – | 66.4 | Talla et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 4.18836 | – | – | 66.9 | Liljeqvist et al. (2011) |
|
|
|
|
| 4.17541 | 1 | 8 | 63.6 | Valdés et al. (2008) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.70219 | – | – | 54.3 | Lucas et al. (2008) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.43367 | – | – | 56.4 | Bagatharia et al. (2010) |
|
|
|
|
| 4.18422 | – | – | 57.6 | Travisany et al. ( |
|
|
|
|
| 3.82016 | – | – | 53.1 | Yin et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.9379 | – | – | 52.8 | Valdes et al. (2011) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.32321 | – | – | 64.5 | Ossandon et al. (2014) |
|
|
|
|
| 4.01987 | – | – | 47.7 | Reference |
Fig. 1Increment in the number of publicly available complete genomes of microorganisms involved in bioleaching according to the NCBI database from year 2000–2015 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/browse/)