Literature DB >> 21190788

Spatial wildlife-vehicle collision models: a review of current work and its application to transportation mitigation projects.

Kari E Gunson1, Giorgos Mountrakis, Lindi J Quackenbush.   

Abstract

In addition to posing a serious risk to motorist safety, vehicle collisions with wildlife are a significant threat for many species. Previous spatial modeling has concluded that wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVCs) exhibit clustering on roads, which is attributed to specific landscape and road-related factors. We reviewed twenty-four published manuscripts that used generalized linear models to statistically determine the influence that numerous explanatory predictors have on the location of WVCs. Our motivation was to summarize empirical WVC findings to facilitate application of this knowledge to planning, and design of mitigation strategies on roads. In addition, commonalities between studies were discussed and recommendations for future model design were made. We summarized the type and measurement of each significant predictor and whether they potentially increased or decreased the occurrence of collisions with ungulates, carnivores, small-medium vertebrates, birds, and amphibians and reptiles. WVCs commonly occurred when roads bisect favorable cover, foraging, or breeding habitat for specific species or groups of species. WVCs were generally highest on road sections with high traffic volumes, or low motorist visibility, and when roads cut through drainage movement corridors, or level terrain. Ungulates, birds, small-medium vertebrates, and carnivore collision locations were associated with road-side vegetation and other features such as salt pools. In several cases, results were spurious due to confounding and interacting predictors within the same model. For example, WVCs were less likely to occur when a road bisected steep slopes; however, steep slopes may be located along specific road-types and habitat that also influence the occurrence of WVCs. In conclusion, this review showed that much of the current literature has gleaned the obvious, broad-scale relationships between WVCs and predictors from available data sets, and localized studies can provide unique and novel results. Future research requires specific modeling for each target species on a road-by-road basis, and measuring the predictive power of model results within similar landscapes. In addition, research that builds on the current literature by investigating rare anomalies and interacting variables will assist in providing sound comprehensive guidelines for wildlife mitigation planning on roads.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21190788     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  24 in total

1.  Potential impacts of highway median barriers on wildlife: state of the practice and gap analysis.

Authors:  Anthony P Clevenger; Angela V Kociolek
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Hot Spots and Hot Times: Wildlife Road Mortality in a Regional Conservation Corridor.

Authors:  Evelyn Garrah; Ryan K Danby; Ewen Eberhardt; Glenn M Cunnington; Scott Mitchell
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Patterns and Composition of Road-Killed Wildlife in Northwest Argentina.

Authors:  Griet An Erica Cuyckens; Lucía Sol Mochi; María Vallejos; Pablo Gastón Perovic; Fernando Biganzoli
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Incorporating Road Crossing Data into Vehicle Collision Risk Models for Moose (Alces americanus) in Massachusetts, USA.

Authors:  Katherine A Zeller; David W Wattles; Stephen DeStefano
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Wolves make roadways safer, generating large economic returns to predator conservation.

Authors:  Jennifer L Raynor; Corbett A Grainger; Dominic P Parker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Individual spatial responses towards roads: implications for mortality risk.

Authors:  Clara Grilo; Joana Sousa; Fernando Ascensão; Hugo Matos; Inês Leitão; Paula Pinheiro; Monica Costa; João Bernardo; Dyana Reto; Rui Lourenço; Margarida Santos-Reis; Eloy Revilla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ungulate vehicle collisions in a peri-urban environment: consequences of transportation infrastructures planned assuming the absence of ungulates.

Authors:  Iñigo Zuberogoitia; Javier del Real; Juan José Torres; Luis Rodríguez; María Alonso; Jabi Zabala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A few large roads or many small ones? How to accommodate growth in vehicle numbers to minimise impacts on wildlife.

Authors:  Jonathan R Rhodes; Daniel Lunney; John Callaghan; Clive A McAlpine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Relative effects of road risk, habitat suitability, and connectivity on wildlife roadkills: the case of tawny owls (Strix aluco).

Authors:  Sara M Santos; Rui Lourenço; António Mira; Pedro Beja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Inter-individual variability of stone marten behavioral responses to a highway.

Authors:  Fernando Ascensão; Clara Grilo; Scott LaPoint; Jeff Tracey; Anthony P Clevenger; Margarida Santos-Reis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.