Heiko Neuss1, Martin Schomaker, Wieland Raue, Gerold Koplin, Oliver Haase. 1. Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty of the Humboldt University Berlin, Charité, Campus Mitte Schumannstrasse 20/21, Berlin, Germany. heiko.neuss@charite.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To optimize postoperative pain therapy after a radical inguinal/iliacal lymph node dissection (RILND), we investigated the influence of a continuous application of a local anaesthetic via a subfascial wound catheter in the abdominal wall in addition to a standardized systemic analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2007 and December 2009, 50 patients with stage III/IV of melanoma disease received, in an observational study, a systemic analgesic therapy. Of these patients, 30 were additionally treated with a subfascial catheter. Main outcome criterion was the pain under mobilisation at the first postoperative morning registered via a visual analogue score. Minor criteria were the analgesic requirement, the specific (surgical) complications and the day of discharge. RESULTS: Patients treated with the subfascial catheter had significant less pain at the first postoperative morning in rest (p = 0.02) and after mobilisation (p = 0.03) without increased morbidity (p = 0.45). Less patients of the treatment group needed a supplementary analgesic medication (p = 0.01) and were able to leave hospital earlier than patients of the control group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A subfascially placed pain catheter enhances postoperative pain therapy after RILND.
BACKGROUND: To optimize postoperative pain therapy after a radical inguinal/iliacal lymph node dissection (RILND), we investigated the influence of a continuous application of a local anaesthetic via a subfascial wound catheter in the abdominal wall in addition to a standardized systemic analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2007 and December 2009, 50 patients with stage III/IV of melanoma disease received, in an observational study, a systemic analgesic therapy. Of these patients, 30 were additionally treated with a subfascial catheter. Main outcome criterion was the pain under mobilisation at the first postoperative morning registered via a visual analogue score. Minor criteria were the analgesic requirement, the specific (surgical) complications and the day of discharge. RESULTS:Patients treated with the subfascial catheter had significant less pain at the first postoperative morning in rest (p = 0.02) and after mobilisation (p = 0.03) without increased morbidity (p = 0.45). Less patients of the treatment group needed a supplementary analgesic medication (p = 0.01) and were able to leave hospital earlier than patients of the control group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A subfascially placed pain catheter enhances postoperative pain therapy after RILND.
Authors: Christiane Voit; Martina Kron; Gregor Schäfer; Alfred Schoengen; Heike Audring; Ansgar Lukowsky; Markus Schwürzer-Voit; Wolfram Sterry; Helmut Winter; Jürgen Rademaker Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: David M Kushner; Regina LaGalbo; Joseph P Connor; Rick Chappell; Sarah L Stewart; Ellen M Hartenbach Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 7.661