BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to study the long-term outcome of adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of morbid obesity. In Europe, the preference for gastric band has declined in favor of Roux-Y-gastric bypass. METHODS: This is a follow-up of a prospective study on a large cohort of patients after laparoscopic gastric banding (LAGB) for morbid obesity. RESULTS: Complete data were collected on 656 patients (88%) from a cohort of 745 patients. After a median follow-up of 95 months (range 60-155), the mean BMI dropped from 41.0 ± 7.3 to 33.2 ± 7.1 kg/m², with a 46.2 ± 36.5% excess weight loss (EWL). A more than 50% EWL was achieved in 44% of patients. The band was still in place in 77.1% of patients; conversion to gastric bypass after band removal was carried out in 98 (14.9%) patients, while a simple removal was done in only 52 (7.9%) patients. Band removal was more likely in women and patients with a higher BMI. CONCLUSIONS: After LAGB, band removal was necessary for complications or insufficient weight loss in 24% of patients. Nearly half of the patients achieved a more than 50% EWL, but in 88%, a more than 10% EWL was observed. LAGB can achieve an acceptable weight loss in some patients, but the failure in one out of four patients does not allow proposing it as a first-line option for the treatment of obesity.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to study the long-term outcome of adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of morbid obesity. In Europe, the preference for gastric band has declined in favor of Roux-Y-gastric bypass. METHODS: This is a follow-up of a prospective study on a large cohort of patients after laparoscopic gastric banding (LAGB) for morbid obesity. RESULTS: Complete data were collected on 656 patients (88%) from a cohort of 745 patients. After a median follow-up of 95 months (range 60-155), the mean BMI dropped from 41.0 ± 7.3 to 33.2 ± 7.1 kg/m², with a 46.2 ± 36.5% excess weight loss (EWL). A more than 50% EWL was achieved in 44% of patients. The band was still in place in 77.1% of patients; conversion to gastric bypass after band removal was carried out in 98 (14.9%) patients, while a simple removal was done in only 52 (7.9%) patients. Band removal was more likely in women and patients with a higher BMI. CONCLUSIONS: After LAGB, band removal was necessary for complications or insufficient weight loss in 24% of patients. Nearly half of the patients achieved a more than 50% EWL, but in 88%, a more than 10% EWL was observed. LAGB can achieve an acceptable weight loss in some patients, but the failure in one out of four patients does not allow proposing it as a first-line option for the treatment of obesity.
Authors: Wim Ceelen; Jean Walder; Anne Cardon; Katrien Van Renterghem; Uwe Hesse; Mohamed El Malt; Piet Pattyn Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Bettina K Wölnerhanssen; Thomas Peters; Beatrice Kern; Andy Schötzau; Christoph Ackermann; Markus von Flüe; Ralph Peterli Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2008-06-30 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Marc Bessler; Amna Daud; Mary F DiGiorgi; William B Inabnet; Beth Schrope; Lorraine Olivero-Rivera; Daniel Davis Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Kemal Dogan; Ralph P M Gadiot; Edo O Aarts; Bark Betzel; Cees J H M van Laarhoven; Laser U Biter; Guido H H Mannaerts; Theo J Aufenacker; Ignace M C Janssen; Frits J Berends Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Nancy Puzziferri; Thomas B Roshek; Helen G Mayo; Ryan Gallagher; Steven H Belle; Edward H Livingston Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Allison M Barrett; Kim T Vu; Kulmeet K Sandhu; Edward H Phillips; Scott A Cunneen; Miguel A Burch Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 3.452